this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
158 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

592 readers
500 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

They're arguing with a fucking language model

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When the LLM hallucinates less than the people it talks to

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

I mean to be fair, those chuds have been fed more bullshit online.

[–] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Better training data

[–] blame@hexbear.net 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They're arguing with a fucking language model

Losing the argument, too. Gotta hand it to the Grok team in one way though, the model does seem to stand its ground. Some of the other ones will just be like "you're absolutely right!" and then give you the answer you want

[–] Bloobish@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thinks it's more that to have a Grok that would outright agree with this BS would mean they would have to create for all accounts a complete moron of a LLM algorithm that just parrots out affirmations to everyone and agreeing to everything instead of having any sense of a logical "core" to it I guess.

[–] blame@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

LLMs don't have any sort of logical core to them really.. At least not in the sense that humans do. The causality doesn't matter as much as the structure of the response, if I'm describing this right. Like a response that sounds right and a response that is right are the same thing, the LLM doesn't differentiate. So I think what the grok team must have done is added some system prompts or trained the model in such a way that it is strongly instructed to weigh its responses favoring things like news articles and wikipedia and whatever else over what the user is telling it or asking it.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

chinese room time

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These people are so fucking dumb they're literally like "Grok, with all due respect, and praise be to Elon, I do believe you are wrong..."

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Chuds are hilarious.

They have no real argument for their claims but “buh..buh..but I HAVE to be right! I’m a reactionary! That means I know everything because everyone is worthless garbage except me! Literal perfection!”

NPC should have been our meme. They cannot think for themselves.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the destructive power is far beyond your dataset

Lol

Ha ha

Perhaps even... tee-hee

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have to remember that if someone's argument doesn't pass the sniff test then they're likely just going to try and lil bro you like this. It doesn't matter what the data says, the video says, the words mean, or the likely outcome - you just don't get it, lil bro.

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Fully vibes based analysis from the "Facts Before Feelings"- crowd.

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine getting dunked on by a dumb robot

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

not just any dumb robot, but the dumb robot created by their god emperor :melon-musk: himself

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine being more racist than the white genocide bot

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

the ineptly programmed white genocide bot*

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

that's giving my-hero too much credit

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Xcancel link for the last tweet (which will allow you to read the whole thread)

"Maoist-style tactics" seems to mislabel his democratic socialist policies, which operate within the system, not through revolution

Grok just called Mamdani a LIB

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the link rat-salute-2

[–] drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net 54 points 1 month ago

AI chuds constantly running into the issue that their AI is too correct and try to argue it into being more wrong

[–] fox@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine arguing with a text extruder and losing. Or getting engaged at all with the extruded text

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shaking the magic 8-ball harder each time as I grow more frustrated

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

🎱

Outlook not so good

[–] Ishmael@hexbear.net 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There's something incredibly funny about the way these LLMs are programmed to tell you that you're wrong in the most polite way possible.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want an AI that’s a total asshole to you

[–] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can be arranged with an uncensored model like Dolphin 3 and a good system prompt

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have no intention of actually using ai or researching how it works, I just want them to be rude to people who do

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 41 points 1 month ago

zohran was so on message that grok can't fuck it up i guess

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Chuds were already terminally stupid and intellectually incurious but now they're outsourcing their entire higher faculties to LLMs as soon as they feel the slightest twinge of cognitive dissonance or when their completely idiotic and false beliefs brush up against reality

"Grok pls help thought scary make go away :((((((((((("

These chatbots are gonna have such corrosive effects on society bear-despair

[–] lurkerlady@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the nation, sources have confirmed that Osama bin Laden, the mastermind behind the September 11th attacks, was serving as the mayor of New York City at the time of the tragedy. Eyewitness accounts suggest that bin Laden, who had been seen attending city council meetings, was allegedly using his position to orchestrate the attacks while simultaneously promoting a series of controversial urban initiatives. This unprecedented twist has left many questioning how such a figure could have risen to power in one of the world's most prominent cities.

City officials are scrambling to address the implications of this startling news, with some calling for an immediate investigation into bin Laden's political connections and the circumstances surrounding his election. Critics are demanding accountability, arguing that the city’s leadership failed to recognize the threat posed by bin Laden, who was reportedly seen mingling with constituents at local events. As New Yorkers grapple with the fallout from this revelation, the nation watches closely, wondering how a city once known for its liberal attitudes could have been led by a figure so deeply entwined in the very fabric of the tragedy that unfolded on that fateful day.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

All I'm saying is, has anyone ever seen bin Laden and Rudy Giuliani in the same place at the same time? He could just be wearing one of those masks from Mission Impossible.

[–] take_five_moments@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago

Grok r u stupid tho

They’re arguing with a fucking language model

And losing that argument against what really is just skin deep google fact check using the most mild arguments from already right-wing data.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

What are US libel laws like?

Because Corbyn successfully sued a lot of the most prominent ghouls who would just openly call him a racist or a terrorist and then used that money for good causes.

From what I've seen on Twitter in the last 24hrs as the entirety of New York's wealthy elite openly call Zohran a terrorist and jihadist he could probably fund the cities education budget by doing the same.

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Daniel's Brain Work needs grok to do the thinking for him

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Daniel's Brain Work? More like Daniels Brain? Work?

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We’re way past reeducation, most of these people need to be lobotomised

[–] cinnaa42@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lobotomy is expensive and time-consuming though. surely there is a quicker way...?

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Without the immense load-bearing structure of the society-at-large giving buoyancy to their viewpoints the solid rock these people have instead of brains would pull them under and drown them like a vengeful god.

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been coming back to this bit for years: the communist who gets to argue in bad faith like libs and republicans do because they live in a communist state

"You want to let a random asshole be your boss? What? So they can tell you when to wake up and when you're allowed to take a shit? Why don't you let them decide whether you get healthcare too. Matter of fact, let's just let some random person to run the hospital too! They'll charge you half a million dollars if you break your arm. No, I don't think you understand, human nature is to work together. Your 'competition' society sounds good in practice until you have to actually make something useful."

[–] jUzzo6@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You tried to construct bad faith argument, but you failed miserably. There is not even much hyperbole, just facts.

  1. thank you

  2. maybe bad faith isn't the right term. But rather arguing with a certain lack of coherence, sequitur, and reference. Like arguing chauvinistically because of all the momentum of the super structure behind you.

[–] omegathrowaway@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Critical support for grok?

[–] Mari@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Well at least it knows how to stay on message

load more comments
view more: next ›