this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
872 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck AI

2756 readers
1120 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skulkbane@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

I used to work in a software architecture team that used AI to write retrospectives, and upcoming projects, and everything needed to have a positive spin, that sounds good but mean nothing.

Extra funny when I find out people use AI to summarize it. So the comical cycle of bullet points to text and back again is real.

I had enough working at the company when my team was working on the new "fantastic" platform, cut corners to reach the deadline on something that will not be used by anyone... and its being built for the explicit purpose of making a better development and working environment.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 53 minutes ago

How about AI that runs as part of a SaaS app? Thts what I think about when I think commercial uses...

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

i use AI every day in my daily work, it writes my emails, performance reviews, project updates etc.

.....and yeah, that checks out!

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Using AI is telling people they shouldn't care about your IP because you clearly don't care about theirs when it passes through the AI lens.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

Stop making using AI sound based

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com -4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

So.... about his AI generated picture beside his name...

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 hours ago

Just because it's generic doesn't mean it's AI generated

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I've been using a cartoonish profile picture for my work emails, teams portrait and other communications for many years. There is almost no way to tell that kind of icon apart from AI generated icons at that size anyway.

And even if it was, that's not the point of the conversation. Fixating on that is such bad faith it betrays a defensiveness about AI generated content, so it's particularly important that someone like you get this message, let me reiterate clearly:

I have a role of responsibility, I hire people and use company budget to make decisions on other companies and products we'll be paying for. When making these decisions I don't look at the email signatures of people or the icons they use. I look at their presentation materials and if that shit is AI generated I know immediately it's just a couple people pretending to be an agency or company, or some company that doesn't quality-control their slides and presentation decks. It shows laziness. I would rather go with a company that has data and specs rather than lean on graphics anyway. So if those graphics are also lazy AF that's a hard pass. Not my first rodeo, I've learned to listen to experience.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was pointing out the irony, nothing more. Not every comment needs to be read too deeply into. Even my avatar picture is AI generated, it was from those blockchain AI generated reddit ones years ago.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone thought it was that funny or interesting of a comment, it reads the same kind of petty AI-bro comment that people make who are absolutely hooked on blindly defending AI in all capacities.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Sure it did... and judging from your previous rant, I'm sure it has nothing to do with you maybe reading much deeper into things that aren't really there.

[–] romanticremedy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I think this problem will get worse because many websites that's used for "your own research" will lose human traffic to watch ads and more bots just scraping their data, reducing motivation to keep the websites running. Most people just take the least resistant path so AI search will be the default soon I think

Yes, I hate this timeline

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Eventually they will pay AI companies to integrate advertisements into the llm's outputs.

Omg I can see it happening. Instead of annoying intrusive ads, this new type will be so natural as if your close friend is suggesting it.

More dystopian future. Yes we need it /s

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 22 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's so annoying because you're correct. I'm finding it harder and harder to use a search engine for things. Hell, the web in general is becoming unusable. It's all shit.

rant

here's my pesonal gripe. Imagine looking for a solution to a problem and find a reddit thread in your search engine of choice. Wording in the description seems to match your exact issue and it's one of the first results. You click on it and...

What i'd do to that smug fuck if I ever got my hands on him aside, me behind a VPN and deleted reddit account can't find the answer. But i can go to chatgpt without logging in to answer my fucking queries and it does it with more efficiency than looking at random sites for things, which most of the time are just sloppy shitty mirrors of Stack Overflow or Quora that BLATANTLY copy content from those websites and just use slightly better SEO...

Also, reddit did this in because of the API shit they pulled. AND THEN THEY SOLD FUCKING ACCESS TO GOOGLE. So me, a fucking person (as far as I know anyway), isn't privileged enough to view the fucking crumbs of information that google just fucking gobbles on a daily basis. Fuck that. This is a move that makes me feel less important than my fucking roomba.

I just feel so mad. I want the old web back. I just want my duckduckgo to work well.

Sorry for the rant.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I ordered some well rated concert ear protection from the maker's website. The order waited weeks to ship after a label was printed and likely forgotten. I went to find a place to call or contact a human there, all they had was a self-described AI chat robot that just talked down to me condescendingly. It simply would not believe my experience.

I eventually got the ear protection but I won't be buying from them again. Can't even staff some folks to check email. I eventually found their PR email address but even that was outsourced to a PR firm that never got back to me. Utter shit, AI.

[–] pattiserieplatogoethe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Never thought about ear protection for concerts, sounds cool. I'll have to look into other options though, if anyone has any recommendations, let me know

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

A number of companies make "tuned" ear plugs to allow some sound through with a desired frequency curve, but reduce SPL to safe levels. I've used Etymotic, which sound great but I personally like a little more reduction. Alpine which I thought had enough reduction but too much coloring, and I settled on Earpeace, for like $25 on-line. Silicone, re-usable and easy to clean and they come with three filters to swap in or out depending on your needs / tastes.

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 36 points 23 hours ago

I'm glad you mentioned the company directly as I also want to steer clear of companies like this.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That would've been such an easy disputed charge and get the plugs somewhere else. I'm not wasting a second on something like that, just telling my credit card company they didn't uphold their end of the deal, and that's that. I will lose hearing out of spite if this happened to me, because I'm an idiot.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 minutes ago

I’ll waste a few moments. It becomes a puzzle. Assuming you managed to make it through the maze, you retrospectively analyze where would 99% of the country have dropped out of the flow and given up?

Then it’s an email to the attorney general if necessary! (I mean that’s been rare but when something is egregious)

🤓

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

Absolutely. Cc dispute is an under-used method of recourse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] roude@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

Alright I don’t like the direction of AI same as the next person, but this is a pretty fucking wild stance. There are multiple valid applications of AI that I’ve implemented myself: LTV estimation, document summary / search / categorization, fraud detection, clustering and scoring, video and audio recommendations... "Using AI” is not the problem, "AI charlatan-ing" is. Or in this guy’s case, "wholesale anti-AI stanning". Shoehorning AI into everything is admittedly a waste, but to write off the entirety of a very broad category (AI) is just silly.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

I have ADHD and I have to ask A LOT of questions to get my brain around concepts sometimes, often cause I need to understand fringe cases before it "clicks", AI has been so fucking helpful to be able to just copy a line from a textbook and say "I'm not sure what they meen by this, can you clarify" or "it says this, but also this, aren't these two conflicting?" and having it explain has been a game changer for me. I still have to be sure to have my bullshit radar on, but thats solved by actually reading to understand and not just taking the answer as is. In fact, scrutinizing the answer against what I've learned and asking further questions has felt like its made me more engaged with the material.

Most issues with AI are issues with capitalism.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 44 points 21 hours ago (19 children)

I don't think AI is actually that good at summarizing. It doesn't understand the text and is prone to hallucinate. I wouldn't trust an AI summary for anything important.

Also search just seems like overkill. If I type in "population of london", i just want to be taken to a reputable site like wikipedia. I don't want a guessing machine to tell me.

Other use cases maybe. But there are so many poor uses of AI, it's hard to take any of it seriously.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think AI is actually that good at summarizing. It doesn’t understand the text and is prone to hallucinate. I wouldn’t trust an AI summary for anything important.

This right here. Whenever I've tried using an LLM to summarize, I spent more time fact-checking it (and finding the inevitable misunderstandings and outright hallucinations—they're always there for anything of substance!) than I'd spend writing my own damned summary.

There is, however, one use case I've found where LLMs work better than alternatives ... provided you do due diligence. To put it bluntly, Google Translate and its ilk of similar slop from Bing, Baidu, etc. suck. They are god-awful at translation of anything but straightforward technical writing or the most tediously dull prose. LLMs are far better translators (and can be instructed to highlight cultural artifacts, possible transcription errors, etc.) ...

... as long as you back-translate in a separate session to check for hallucination.

Oh, and Google Translate-style translators really suck at Classical Chinese. LLMs do much better (provided you do the back-translation check for hallucination).

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

If I understand how AI works (predictive models), kinda seems perfectly suited for translating text. Also exactly how I have been using it with Gemini, translate all the memes in ich_iel 🤣. Unironically it works really well, and the only ones that aren't understandable are cultural not linguistic.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Its just a statistics game. When 99% of stuff that uses or advertises the use of "AI" is garbage, then having a mental heuristic that filters those out is very effective. Yes you will miss those 1% of useful things, but thats not really an issue for most people. If you need it you can still look for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›