this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
534 points (99.3% liked)

News

37400 readers
1665 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts say Pentagon chief has endangered secrets of US defense department and given assistance to foreign spies

As more develops about the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and his repeated disclosures of sensitive military intelligence in unsecured Signal group chats, there are growing concerns his behavior has weakened the Pentagon in the eyes of its foreign adversaries and made him and his entourage a top espionage target.

Allies, already concerned by Donald Trump’s aggressive tariffs, have also begun to see the US as an intelligence-sharing liability. There are fears that the mounting firings and leak inquiries in Hegseth’s orbit, along with his inability to manage these internal crises, exposes the entire global US war footing – especially, if a geopolitical and external crisis comes across his desk.

“[What if] a foreign entity, whether it be a state actor or non-state actor, is able to intercept the movements of troops or department personnel, or something like that, capture them and hold them to ransom,” said Kristofer Goldsmith, an Iraq war veteran and CEO at Task Force Butler. “That kind of thing could very easily happen.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 154 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just Hesgeth.

The whole administration is comprised of conspiracy nuts and other big brains who will click on any crazy link they come across.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Director of National Intelligence is a probable Russian asset. Also the President.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

And let's not forget Elon and his Doge bro minions. They're destroying the security around every system they touch, firing the people responsible for that security, moving sensitive data out through starlink to God knows where, and apparently just giving logins to Russia.

Almost makes storing nuclear secrets in a bathroom seem quaint and wholesome by comparison.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This, and Elmo too

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Espionage? They are giving it away lol

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Come on down to Crazy Pete's intel emporium! We're practically giving this intel away!

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Crazy Pete's 😂

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Seriously, these people are publicly making mistakes that my grandma would make. If there's a best practice for safety and security, they actively don't do it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry, the Russians are still busy processing what they downloaded after fElon left the downloads open in DOGE-infested agencies.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, only if Trump hasn't already Xeroxed the classified papers already, himself, to sell for personal profit.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unrelated, it's crazy to me that Xerox has remained in the lexicon for so long.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

it's a REALLY fun word.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I've seen this one! This is where the crowd starts chanting "LOCK HER UP, LOCK HER UP" right?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But what about her emails? /S

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

America's government is already dead. This is darkly comical. America is dead. I don't say that with pride but it is true. It is not what is was, and I'm not sure it ever was what they said it was.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Never was, just this time the mask fell off.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Of course he is.

But also, foreign agents can literally just walk into the pisser at Mara-lago and find classified documents.

This administration has no interest in maintaining state secrets.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal leak Pete is a pretty good nickname

[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Whiskeyleaks

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The amount of unqualified idiots being handed out security passes like halloween candy is unfathomable

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Earlier in the week, news broke that Hegseth had personally created a Signal group chat including his wife, brother and about a dozen other people who he then texted highly sensitive information on active strikes in Yemen.... One person said Russian and Chinese spies were no doubt directly targeting susceptible people in Hegseth’s inner circle.

Even if, as I am sure he very wrongly does, Hegseth believes himself morally beyond reproach and too smart to be tricked, does he honestly think every single person in his circle and in their circles is as well? JFC.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

I’m sure everyone in his circle are all using highly secure mobile devices not linked to their personal identities, on the latest software updates and would never be duped by a phishing link or be the target of a zero click exploit by a state actor.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why bother? I'm sure for the right price it's for sale. Might require a trip to the Mar-a-Lago bathroom though.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

after the complimentary lunch of room-temperature big macs and fries, that won't be a problem.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 year ago

Oh hey ya think? Is this kind of deductive reasoning what a masters degree at an ivy league school gets you? Man I wish I could be smart enough to figure that out.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That headline is a masterwork of obfuscation, softening an obvious fact by hiding it behind "fears grow".

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

is 'espionage' a new whisky distillery? Then he is def a big target.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obviously. Is there any point in history when the SecDef wasn't one of the juiciest espionage targets in the world, regardless of who is filling the role at the time?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah but how many times could spies bribe the person in that role with a 6 pack? You could let him pick what he wants from the gas station beer case and he'd probably give you all his passwords.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ya, the headline is kinda bullshit. The SecDef is always going to be a top espionage target. The real problem is that, had anyone else who holds a security clearance been this slipshod with classified material, they would be in jail now. The two tiered nature for accountability for security violations demonstrates deep problems with the entire system.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Experts eating at roach infested e coli laboratory masquerading as a restaurant have this to say: I saw Pete handle food without gloves. It doesn't inspire confidence in the establishment.

[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Even if they do get rid of him, won't he be a vulnerability for years to come? Because of the position he was given, certainly not earned, he is privy to not only the details of current military strikes but also secret goals for future military projects. Right? I assume most people who have these jobs have a modicum of self-respect and patriotic duty. But couldn't he just leak that important info to anyone even after he is fired?

load more comments
view more: next ›