[-] Vent@lemm.ee 80 points 1 week ago

Compared to dumping white phosphorus over hospitals and refugee camps, killing 2 (?) children during an attack that targeted hundreds/thousands is many orders of magnitude more precise. I hate dead innocents as much as anyone, but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

The point of the post isn't to praise the pagers attack. It's to point out that Isreal is capable of causing less collateral damage in Gaza but chooses not to.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 100 points 3 weeks ago

� is used to represent an invalid character, so it makes sense that it'd appear often when bad data is being rendered (or good data is being rendered improperly).

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 130 points 1 month ago

I'm at a loss

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 1 month ago

Fake. Squidward is eating a Krabby Patty.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 171 points 1 month ago

But... it's cybersecurity. What is a "brief visual and non-intrusive room inspection" even looking for? Anonymous masks? Green terminals with scrolling text? People shouting "enhance" and/or "I'm in"?

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 88 points 2 months ago

Dems controlled the Senate with the slimmest majority possible. One fucker that owns a coal company was able to tank all meaningful climate bills and there was nothing Biden or anyone else could do about it. You can forget about any progressive policies in that environment, lol. Biden did well with the tools he was given.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 93 points 4 months ago

Only if you're using a bad font that doesn't differentiate between I and l

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 78 points 8 months ago

The Mac Pro only costs three times as much as a cheese grater???

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 11 months ago

Have they considered doubling the number of prisons and providing police with tanks?

587
submitted 11 months ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
162
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

25
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Title is somewhat misleading. It's not for anything video-related. It's for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 172 points 1 year ago

"If it can be done and it is done, for example, for crimes such as child pornography, for intellectual property, which is stealing, they should have to do it too." - LaLiga chief Javier Tebas

Ah yes, two equivalent crimes: CSAM and... um... watching sports without paying

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 95 points 1 year ago

Damn and Facebook ratted them out

193
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] Vent@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the classic "If I owe you $5 it's my problem. If I owe you $5B it's your problem."

36
287
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/reddit@lemmy.ml
100
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml
67
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/syncforlemmy@lemmy.world

It's been nearly 10 days, hand it over Google!

997
Woke Adapter (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
-11
submitted 1 year ago by Vent@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
11
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vent@lemm.ee to c/cat@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3610354

Looking to pick up a self cleaning litterbox but there are a lot of options. The coolest one I've seen by far is the CatGenie Automatic Cat Box, but it's nearly $500 and seems a little overkill.

I've also seen that the PetSafe Litterbox is a very popular choice, but it uses proprietary litter refills and crystal litter when I'd prefer clay litter.

I've been getting away with a $15 do-it-yourself litterbox just fine for a while, but I think I (and my cat) would appreciate something that doesn't require daily maintenance. Something as simple as an automatic rake would be interesting.

My main goals are:

  1. Requires as little maintenance as possible while keeping my cat happy and the smell under control
  2. No proprietary lock-in (I can use my own litter)
  3. Doesn't break the bank
  4. Built well, won't break / easy to fix / good warranty / cheap enough that I can just buy a new one if it breaks

While I am looking for budget friendly options, I'm also curious on the more expensive options. I can't imagine what justifies spending $700 on a Litter-Robot when emptying a litterbox manually isn't that bad and the CatGenie is $500 and promises zero-maintenance. Have you had good luck with premium options like that?

view more: next ›

Vent

joined 1 year ago