While bots seem like the obvious answer, there's also a possibility of demographic shift over time towards a younger and more mainstream commenting/posting population. More young adults with no baggage asking for advice means cutting ties is more likely to be a novel suggestion for them and has less friction, and more young adults (and, frankly, kids) in the commenting population means less nuance, more "edge", and generally more advocating for hot-takes that have attracted upvotes in the past.
LOOSEN UP!
We're too close!
Are those OG '83 Return of the Jedi sheets, or a re-release?
Jags are the weirdest, possibly worst, winning-record team I’ve seen in a while, but it beats being just as bad and also losing.
You have to be quite the special guy to lose a knife fight and still be the one who gets fired. Of course, if you started the fight in the first place in a hazy drunken rage...
That's his major value-add. With any luck he'll sputter in the primary versus someone with actual charisma and decent ideas.
He believes something incredibly toxic and nuts, but I'm not sure it's exactly that Christianity is "true," but rather that it's just so incredibly useful that it might as well be, and therefore it's not hypocritical to espouse it with gusto, regardless of what you personally think about the supernatural.
https://www.wired.com/story/the-real-stakes-real-story-peter-thiels-antichrist-obsession/
I don't recall the link for now, but there was a fairly long piece a couple of weeks (months?) ago that went into the Thiel religious awakening. The short version is that he doesn't necessarily believe in Jesus so much as he believes that organized religion is so important as a binding agent in society that you're better off pretending to believe in it, advocating for it, and imposing it by force if it seems necessary, all to satisfy the human need for mimesis, or imitative desires and behaviors.
Society's movement away from Christianity in particular as a uniquely humane and sophisticated global-ready religion means it's okay to fall back on older "tribal" religious patterns like assertive scapegoating to reimpose the world order. There is room for regions of the world with independent traditions to impose them as a means of having a safe and orderly society, because it allows the Christian region to interact with a relatively small number of competing ideologies, which satisfy similar psychological needs for their populations, and therefore a balance can be maintained. It's better for the system if most people hold sincere beliefs about the supernatural aspects, but it's not utterly critical, particularly for elites, as long as folks legitimately buy into the societal repercussions of failing to rely on religion for social control. It's like Pascal's wager on meth, which is appropriate because a lot of it dates back to a German guy who was a Nazi apologist through most of the thirties until being discarded by them right before WW2. Some of this is strictly IIRC, so be on notice, LOL.
Conveniently, all this allows the Christianized advocates for this worldview to declare any systemic threat to the triumph of their vision for world peace to be accurately-enough referred to as the Antichrist, and the things you're allowed to do to oppose the Antichrist are quite broad.
JD Vance is thought to be well-ensconced in the ideology.
EDIT: Found it, plus a couple of others that discuss the same thing. Thiel is absolutely nuts, but not quite the way he's sometimes portrayed.
Those two are good. I'd also add Black Panther 2 and Dr. Strange 2. Both were hyped, and both of them got saddled with "backdoor pilot" and stage-setting duties for multiple properties at the expense of their own narratives. Marvel's done that all the way back to the first post-credit Avengers stinger, but in those two cases it was a lot and really kneecapped two promising projects. Then of course BP got dealt a very rough hand with Chadwick Boseman's passing, but I'm not sure they played that hand very well, either.
But it is money they're perfectly happy not to give you if you can't or won't set an equal amount aside.
There may be something older, but I actually just ported over what may be the oldest files I kept around. In college around the turn of the century I did my last notable QBASIC program (I am an English major, though much more tech adjacent than most of my peers from the program are likely to have been), a rudimentary version of Sabaac, the card game from Star Wars, using the West End Games rules that are basically like glorified Blackjack. It's super basic (LOL), and I honestly don't recall if the computer is random or has a simple algorithm like Blackjack's "if >= 17, stay, else hit." The thing I was happiest about was a subroutine that takes in an external text file and converts it to a colored pixel from a palette of about 30-ish colors, so there is a deck of hexagonal cards in glorious MCGA.