politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It’s way creepier and unethical than a harem.
If all he was doing was basically paying women to fuck him, that would be maybe unsavory but not terribly weird.
He’s promising to pay women to bear his children, but uses artificial insemination if they agree to it. Then he sends them an NDA and if they won’t sign he claims the baby isn’t his.
God that's so pathetic
He also pays extra for a procedure to make sure the child is always male. That's part of the reason why he hates trans people, he can't accept one of his children turned out to be female.
Because of course his kid being trans is somehow about him, that's what being a narcissist is all about
Republicans, and the right more generally, have always been hollow shits. "In-groups to protect and out-groups to bind", as they say. They're the worst people and should be removed from power.
They're infuriating. They don't want abortions, but they don't want sexual education or contraceptives. They want a stay at home parent, but they don't want to have wages high enough to support that. They are like children screaming they want to eat their birthday cake but don't want it to go away. We need to stop taking them seriously and instead put them down for a nap.
Preach
Sorry.
Go back to the 1960s. Ronald Reagan had divorced his first wife to marry a hot blond bimbo. People said that Conservatives would never elect such a wild rake. All Ronnie had to do was throw them some red meat and suddenly a Hollywood pretty boy who'd skipped WW2 became a Founding Father.
I got curious so I did some searching:
Wyman divorced Reagan in 1949, Reagan married Nancy Davis in 1952
So not entirely accurate to say he divorced his first wife to marry another (by some accounts, Wyman divorced him and moved on).
That being said, fuck Reagan all the same.
Reagan did borderline rape a 19 year old aspiring actress, promising to get her into meetings with producers, a week before he married Nancy Davis.
The point is that in the 1960s a divorced man was considered suspect.
Ronald 6 Wilson 6 Reagan 6
Throat GOAT Nancy Reagan was a hot blond bimbo?
It isn't even a fun harem. No dancing ladies or neat see-through clothing, just an IVF jar and a botched penis implant.
We still pretending that republicans stand for anything?
They'll stand upside down on their heads if it gives them a better shot at licking their fuhrer's diseased taint.
“Family Values” is just a stand in for Anti-LGBTQ or even Anti-Interracial relationship. Like you see the words “family values” on dating profiles of conservatives below the “looking for” section, even on profiles of multi divorced people. Basically it’s just code for “only bigots apply”
The problem is you thinking it’s possible to reason with these voters. They howl family values but vote for rapists, pedophiles and convicts. Musk only started using his child after the killing of the POS exec, because now he has a human shield.
As if he’s brave enough to leave his ~~house~~ ~~mansion~~ ~~fortress~~ Soviet-chic bunker without a dozen goons sanitizing his environment.
Look, if a partner wants to stay home, cook, clean, have and take care of babies and the other wants to work and is all consensual, fine.
I don't see any people lining up for that life though.
Lebensborn
Oh they're just teeing up to bring back a particular modern revelation that was super epic and cool and not totally fucked up, weird, sick, depraved and entirely self serving to the personal desires of the few. Classic human shit to be honest. Genetics is gonna come back swinging hard on these dipshits thankfully it has a knack for correcting this sort of thing
Hey, everyone knows it's way better for one man to have scores of wives than for – gasp – two men to be married
This guy is worried about birth rate but isn't ivf daughters? Women are substantially more valuable then men when it comes this.
It looks hypocritical.
Muskrat needs someone to pump his dick up for him
Why musk and not directly trump?
Oh musk and trump should totally try to make babies. Naturally trump will be the daddy.
In the future movies will be treating related to musk like related to hitler.