this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
1399 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

9272 readers
1485 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 6 points 53 minutes ago

Buying a Hyundai of all choices after a tesla is doubling down on shitty car choices

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 2 points 47 minutes ago

What a weird wet dream. Teslas are stacked with cameras, they'd never get away with it.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago

I've heard insurance companies in the Un-united Dystopia of america have stopped insuring them

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 12 points 6 hours ago

I have owned only three brands of cars with a total of four different engines. And next to my Toyotas, my one Hyundai was incredibly reliable. Made it to 300k before I gave it away to my cousin. And the only time it ever left my in a jam was a Walmart parking lot when the starter burnt out. I walked across the street, bought a new one, and with the help of a YouTube video & $10 worth of tools from that very Walmart, shit was done. I highly recommend an old sonata to any one hard up, and in need for something reliable. Mine actually had heated seats! Easily the best $700 I've ever spent! I could rant about that car for ever.

[–] guilhermegnzaga@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In Brazil we call this jeitinho brasileiro (brazillian way*)... but this seems so american in my pov *means that you should take advantage in everything

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 46 minutes ago

In American we call this Insurance Fraud and it is illegal and causes insurance rates to be much higher.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You just know a dealership is going to get caught setting it's own Teslas on fire. That is going to be the free space on many 2025 Bingo cards.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago

It's actually just a convenient software update.

Download the update, start the engine, and run away

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Man a shitty lining to this cloud is the kids that had to mine the lithium for the batteries into useless cars.

[–] bacondragonoverlord@feddit.org 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I think you're thinking of Cobalt? Lithium mainly is mined in big industrial facilities in Australia and Chile. Not like cobalt wich was in the news for being mined by hand, including with children.

However "new" Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries go without cobalt and other rare earth materials (not actually rare btw). Most electric cars use these batteries nowadays including many Teslas.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

I just think it's bizarre that Magnetite is considered a rare mineral. It's literally cheaper than lead

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 4 points 10 hours ago

I didn't know this, thanks for taking the time to inform

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 70 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

So long as only victims are insurance companies and Tesla, I am okay with it. To be fair, they kinda deserve it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 38 minutes ago (2 children)

Committing insurance fraud is honestly pretty questionable from a ethics perspective. You are cheating the game at the cost of everyone else. Why are people ok with this now in 2025? In the last few decades it as become socially acceptable to cheat the system for your own gain.

I fully support the arrest and prosecution of those who commit insurance fraud. Same goes for companies who cheat there workers out of pay.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

The "ethics" of following laws stem entirely from the social contract. Both sides agree to a set of rules because it's fair or in their mutual interest to take part in society. But when one side violates that social contract (causes a constitutional crisis, ignores the rule of law, etc.) then all bets are off. If you blindly follow the rules while the other side is actively ripping them up, then you're at best a sucker and at worst complicit.

[–] silverlose@lemm.ee 1 points 33 minutes ago

Would you/do you support what happened during the Boston tea party? I think we all like law and order, but under the current regime, justices are being found dead from mysterious causes. It’s hard to say it’s the same system of law we’re used to.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 1 hour ago

Insurance companies are never the only victim. They just pass the pain forward.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 23 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Well, no, it's all of us, because of how insurance works. Payouts go up, premiums go up. As long as the number of destroyed Teslas is a drop in the ocean we won't notice, but lots of companies love a good excuse to put prices up and this is just handing them a gold plated excuse on a silver platter.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 36 minutes ago

I scares me the number of people willing to commit insurance fraud. I've had friends who would do things like park there car in a hail storm.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

Just a reminder that insurance is a scam. You are compelled to pay for it under penalty of law in the case of car insurance, and the insurance companies do everything possible to maximize their profits, being for profit companies. What this means in general is that people pay more into insurance than they ever get out. If they didn't the insurance companies wouldn't make a profit. The money you pay isn't going into some huge fund that supports everyone who pays for it. If it doesn't go to paying out claims now it goes straight to the insurance executives, or investors, or to "lobbying" politicians to keep the racket going. The day you stop paying out you get fucking nothing. All that money is just gone, for the pleasure of maybe having your claim paid out if your insurance company can't weasel their way out of paying. Insurance is a scam, a bunch of penny pinching middlemen draining the world of human productivity and effort for their own benefit and nothing else. Any benefit a particular individual happens to get is a loss to be minimized to them.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 34 minutes ago

It would be a scam if you couldn't choose the company. However, you have plenty of options. Insurance also encourages better driving since things like tickets can cause price increases. There are some privacy concerns with insurance but that is a separate issue.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I mean, I would hope insurance doesn’t need to pay me. That imply I’ve involved in an accident or had my stuff stolen. Even a not for profit insurance company would operate like that. I can afford $100/mo but I cannot afford to replace not only my car but the car or property of whatever I may be found at fault for hitting(and if I get hit, can that person afford to pay me?). If I got into an accident, especially if I were younger, how would I replace my $5,000 car and the $70k BMW I just hit? What if my kid set my house on fire or what if fire leapt from my neighbour’s house to mine?

That said, it’s absolutely true that system is bloated to an absolutely disgusting level and its shocking lack of regulation for, as you say, being legally required is pitiful. It deplorable that people need to fight to get payouts sometimes and how the US uses it for healthcare is just hellish. It’s also true that the capitalist/libertarian ideal of insurance only really works if people are paid adequately but both those systems do fuck all, on purpose, to keep people’s financial security safe.

In Québec, liability is paid for by the province so our car insurance is a lot cheaper and regular insurance only needs to cover the physical property, so that’s nice. It’s still got it’s problems I’m sure, but it’s a step in the right direction.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Oh and the whole concept of an excess. So I have to pay to have my car insured but if the damage to my car is less than a certain amount I have to pay for it? What's the point of the insurance then.

My car is probably worth less than the excess anyway so if it was a total write-off I'd get a maybe five hundred for it, and that's it

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

being for profit companies

I think the approach in Australia is a bit better - bodily injury coverage is provided by the state and is part of the registration fee for the car.

It's not perfect and only covers injuries to people, and does not cover repairing cars (you need to get separate insurance from an insurer for that) but it's a good first step I guess. It means that as long as your car is registered, medical costs for both you and anyone you hit are covered.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm also Australian and what this person is saying is true

I beleive its called "CTP" or "compulsory third party insurance" if I recall correctly

You can get additional optional car insurance in Australia as well

[–] GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

In France, most insurance companies are mutual and not for profit. (Basically a communist hellhole!)

[–] GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What you are describing is not insurance, it's capitalism in general.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

Insurance is very much needed. If there weren't that many reckless drivers then insurance would be cheaper.

I wish we had the same thing as in Singapore. Their cars literally cannot go over the speed limit.

But yes, when insurance is basically required to have, then it's good to start having government participation in it. The government needs to be the majority stakeholder, as it also provides all of the customers.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Well, they'd put the premiums up on tesla owners as the cars now carry increased risk.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago

I honesty don't think vandalism is covered under a lot of insurance policies.

Also I have yet to see a vandalized Tesla. It would be pretty silly for you to go vandalize a car as that's not something you want on your criminal record.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 37 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Tesla has its own insurance company so double whammy lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 41 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is the only good use of a Tesla now, IMO. Get it fully insured, then go park it in a dark alley near a popular area. It'll get torched before too long. No fraud involved with setting your own car on fire....

Then use the money to buy something that's not made by a Nazi.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Forget to turn on sentry mode.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Straight outta the urban-cop playbook.

load more comments
view more: next ›