this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
493 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19913 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Satanic Temple is going to be very busy. Maybe I should make a donation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And this is it. This is the step that makes the US a theocratic dictator.

This is the thing with religion: ANYTHING can be labelled as being against it. Muslims? Anti Christian bias. Atheists? Don't get me started. Gays? Obviously. Scientists? Doh! We do want the results from science, though, like computers, food, clean water, etc, but scientists are evil devil anti Christian.

I want nothing to do with the US anymore

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dude you forgot women. Women are the prime target of all religion. They'll end no fault divorce, end marital rape, institute child marriage and call it all gods fucking plan to procreate. The right to vote will only belong to male heads of family.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

... white male heads of family

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 251 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No freedom of religion without freedom FROM religion.

Resist a theocratic state.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 126 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"The First Amendment clearly says "Congress shall make no law" and this is an executive order. Seems constitutional to us"

Supreme Court (probably)

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Jesus fuck I hate how plausible this is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"To confront such weaponization and religious persecution, today I'm signing an executive order to make our Attorney General, who's a great person — she's going to be a great Attorney General — Pam Bondi the head of a task force, brand new, to eradicate anti-Christian bias," Trump said.

I feel like Trump’s quote here from the article is even worse than the headline suggests.

First is the use of the word eradicate rather than prosecute. It’s a much more dehumanizing tone, as if there a bunch of pests that need to be wiped out.

And second, which is no surprise but is even more worrying, is how much praise he put on Bondi there. That means loyalty to a person rather than to a nation or constitution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_q@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Anyone wanna get together, publicly, and burn a huge pile of Bibles?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whoawhoawhoa...have I been going to the wrong Communist Socialist Democrat America Hater meetings? We've been burning babies, not bibles. Looks like we goofed.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As long as the babies have been baptized before they’re burned, Y’all Queda should be fine with it cuz you’re just express shipping them to heaven.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It is funny after years of fighting taliban the US now need to deal with neo-taliban at home.

There’s a reason christofascists are often referred to as “Y’all Queda”.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

We've always been plagued with these people but now they have a tool like donvict.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

An entire voter base can't rabidly denounced [insert scary middle eastern religion] religious rule while salivating at a chance for Christian religious rule.

It's been here all along.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The takeaway can be Bin Laden won, the terrorists won.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The courts will strike this down as fast as the birthright citizenship thing. Flagrant violation of the Estate Clause

These aren't laws whatsoever, so they don't even need to strike anything down, just dismiss any attempt at actually doing something like this lol

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 169 points 4 days ago (1 children)

DEI but just for Christians

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 47 points 4 days ago (4 children)

be explicit: white Christians

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Didn’t Elon Musk and Michael Flynn just post about how they will stop processing payments to a Lutheran organization?

Let’s start there.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Those weren't Real Christians. They were followers of some fringe leftist ideology from the Middle East.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I just got your post two days later. I am an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (33 children)

Jesus pretty much was a socialist so where does that leave us?

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 108 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's a group of people that go around in white sheets with pointy hats and they burn crosses, often on other peoples property. That seems pretty anti-christian to me and should be the first to be investigated.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Everything about the GOP as very anti-christian. Jesus was a bleeding heart socialist by today's standards. I'm not sure what books these fools have been reading that says otherwise.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 38 points 4 days ago (5 children)

they don't read. their megachurch pastors tell them what the bible says about who to hate. they draw all their rhetoric from Leviticus and Numbers to justify their gross misinterpretation of Revelations. they ignore the gospels entirely. here are the things you need to know when dealing with christofascist propaganda

  1. the old testament comes from the living documents of the jewish faith maintaining the history of their ancestors and people. the jewish faith is largely an ongoing conversation about what it means to inherit this story and how to resist oppression by enacting boycotts, strikes, and maintaining the cultural heritage of foods. no one thinks everything in it is right and good except for some folks who worship orthodox hegemony beyond all else
  2. the teachings of jesus are primarily about how orthodox hegemony is bad and that the true value of ethics and morality is to help others and strengthen communities where you are
  3. the book of revelations is early christians' attempt to document the events of a genocide enacted by an authoritarian who co-opted the trappings of religion. it's a warning against the types of coagulation of power being enacted by donald trump literally right now. they are the followers of the antichrist they accuse woke folk of being. woke folk are who get raptured into the eternal song of historical memory by remaining true to the teachings that kindness and grace is more important than orthodoxy. the book is all florid and weird because the roman censors didn't recognize it for what it was, so it was able to survive.
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 15 points 3 days ago

says the fucking antichrist

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 80 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

In truth it was very challenging to stay calm in the face of someone saying something so blatantly biased and false. Packaged as an opinion, of course, but presented as the truth.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made, but I know for a fact that the only thing I accomplished is that she's unlikely to make that particular statement in front of me again. No minds were changed that day. It's just sad.

As someone who actually IS persecuted in this country for things I cannot change about myself, I really don't get why someone would want to live under the delusion that they are being persecuted when they otherwise aren't. It's not fun and there's no benefit to being persecuted.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 65 points 4 days ago

And by that, they mean something like this? Xtians get all kinds of privileges and everyone else has to convert or be a second class citizen?

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They want to be David vs Goliath. Being the ones persecuted means that they can go on the offensive without feeling bad about it. It means whatever they do is justified as being a means of survival. It gives them an excuse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I have a family member who told me last year that they believe Christians are the most persecuted group in the USA, even more so than gay people.

I asked questions and challenged some of the statements being made

I imagine some of those questions included:

  1. How many christians in the USA were killed in the last 20 years only because they were christian?
  2. When was the last time a gathering of christians in a public library doing things unrelated to being christian forced to cease and desist?
  3. Is it common in society for a young adult living with parents to profess their love for christ and be thrown out of their homes and essentially abandoned by the family?
  4. Is there a history in this country to regularly arrest and prosecute christians for gathering or holding ceremonies like communion?

edit: A couple more additions.

  1. Has marriage between two christians been illegal for nearly the entirety of the existence of the USA?

  2. Are there camps that some misguided parents send their children to to be "deprogrammed" from being christian?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hi Canadians!

Want to join our christofascist state where we jail those that don't believe in sky daddy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Can we get a law in place that says if you have to sue the government to stop some obvious bullshit, that you recover your legal fees?

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Honstely you should recover 2x your legal fee's. That way you pay your lawyers, get something for yourself, and its extra punishment to the people getting sued for their bullshit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 79 points 4 days ago (4 children)

the task force will work to fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society

Yeah, Democrats did this already. They're called Hate Crimes and it's the law. Not a measley little EO.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 54 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Good thing I'm not biased against Christians specifically. Fuck all religions equally - fair and balanced.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So we can still be anti christianity as long as our opinions are based on facts?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

They have no idea what "bias" actually means, they just intend to weaponize it to be whatever they want. Like they do with every other word.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Every time I read something he said it hurts my brain. Everything about his speech patterns is so fucking stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Jesus is pretty cool. You show me a christian who follows jesus' teachings, and I'll have mad respect. You give me some dipshit doing the most anti-christlike shit imaginable, but with crosses all around, and I'll make fun of him forever. Just a way of un-tarnishing the brand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 35 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I mean he can sign it, it’s going literally nowhere. But if this ain’t proof that there’s a genuine desire to install a theocracy in the US, then I don’t know what will convince anyone.

The fact that a President even suggests this is a clear tell that some want the US being Iran but with Jesus.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean he can sign it, it’s going literally nowhere.

This is incorrect. He can sign it, and Bondi will start bringing these cases to court. One would think that it would immediately stop there as the first judge she argues in front of dismisses the case for being blatantly unconstitutional and having her brought up on sanctions for multiple blatant violations of the defendant's constitutional rights.

But in this court system? I wouldn't be so sure. At the very least, I expect at least some people to get caught up in this dragnet and have their lives upended for years until the Supreme Court finally stops dragging their feet. But given this administration, this Supreme Court, and the number of MAGA judges that Trump can forum shop through, there is a non-zero chance this actually succeeds.

It wouldn't be the first time this administration and SCOTUS hand-waves away constitutional protections.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

How many EOs does this dickhead have now in these two weeks alone?

How many does a normal president have in a full four year term?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

And the less specific he is in talking about things like this, the more this will be blatantly abused

load more comments
view more: next ›