this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
532 points (96.7% liked)

okmatewanker

755 readers
6 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 191 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)
  • Transporting the grain from the field to the mill.
  • Milling
  • Transporting flour (and at least 3 other ingredients) from the mill to the bakery
  • Baking, packaging
  • Transporting the bread from the bakery to the supermarket
  • Running the supermarket.

Turns out there is a difference between raw wheat and bread. More news at 8.

When farmers get paid too little for their effort, making these wild comparisons isn’t helping. It seems we’re about a year away from the conclusion “I stubbed my toe. This must be capitalism’s fault.”

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What did you stub your toe on? Under which economic system was that object produced? Open your eyes, sheeple!

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

Whoa whoa go back to sleep you're woke now

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

And items like Bread and Milk are commonly loss leaders - their priced at a loss or a minimal profit margin by the larger retailers that can afford to make a loss to profit richly elsewhere.

Staples like bread and milk are highly price competitive because there is so much choice - choice in brands but more importantly choice in which supermarket customers go to.

That price pressure goes down the entire production chain. Big companies like Warburtons and Hovis can still profit asbthey benefit from economies of scale, as do the supermarket chains. Big farms also benefit from economies of scale to profit. At every level the small players - farmers, independent bakeries and small retailers struggle to make any profit at all. And at every level wages are kept down.

This is capitalism.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don’t understand how he can be part of this industry and not understand it at all.

Or he does understand and is playing a victim. Second is more likely.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The second one for sure. But i would also argue that Clarkson himself is only part of the industry to some degree, because primarily he is still in the (quite successful) business of producing television. And while he is certainly learning stuff the actual act of running a farm is still primarily done by others.

On the practical farming side by Kaleb and on the business side by Charlie, who in this case would be the one understanding how the economics between 25p/kg weat and 1.25£ for a loaf of bread work.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

I think you’ve got a valid point there. I would also say Clarkson is very “me me me”.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is the guy who successfully played victim when he got fired for punching someone in the face. He knows exactly what he's doing.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

Yup. I remember it well.

Did you see the interview during the farmers protest where he got upset that the interviewer pointed out he’d only bought the farm to dodge IHT?

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s actually kind of crazy all of the rest of that happens for £1.25

Now if we do insulin in the USA, it won’t make so much sense. Capitalism!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Incomplete picture, need prices on the transport of the wheat, processing it into flour for bread use, transporting the flour to the bakery, bakery electric to run ovens, labor to run ovens, machines (probably) that slice and bag the bread, and trucks/drivers to distribute it to retailers, and the retailer's labor/overhead. All of that factors in the price from "wheat" to "bread," sure nobody in that chain is selling for a loss and they all make profit, but even if everyone operated at cost it's still going to be more expensive in "bread" state than "wheat" state for the simple fact that even if everyone "does it for cost" it will still add more to do more things to the product.

If he said "we sell wheat for 25p/kg and the store resells that same package of wheat for 1.40," he may have a point. Even then the point is "sell directly to end users and cut out the middle man then." Hell if buying weed has taught me one thing it's that the more people touch it the more expensive it gets, always get as close as you can to the distributor and buy in bulk.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are completely correct.

But that doesn't mean the price is always right.

Here in Belgium we had a year where the electricity was 6x more expensive. They changed the bread prices from around €2.20 to around €2.80 because of that (no idea why). Now the electricity has its normal price again, but the breads are still the same price.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This is the part of the whole thing that pisses me off the most. They’ll use anything to justify an increase but never ever bring it back down.

Everyone is poorer for it except the assholes can never get enough.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Proof positive that doing drugs prepares you for the world better than head-in-the-sand conservatism! Party on.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Dont forget the farmers are being subsidized by the government so they have little risk. But noone seems to take note of that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

According to Past Clarkson, if Current Clarkson can't make good money farming then Current Clarkson shouldn't be a farmer. Simple as that.

And that is because Current Clarkson is the worst farmer ... in the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol, not discovers, just uses it a way that at this moment might serve him to further his own agenda.

It's just a business that has one "influencer" already on staff.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 29 points 1 week ago

He’s not the sharpest egg in the attic, is he?

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait until he finds out how much we pay farmers in other countries for their goods

Man aged 64 and 3/4 discovers unequal exchange

[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

damn bread is only 1.40 there?

even the store brand enriched with sawdust bread here costs between 1.90 and 2.50

ACTUAL bread costs between 4.50 and can even be 6-7 if you buy the fancy bread

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Dave's Killer all the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well Jeremy, somebody makes bread out of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This dumbass was happy that government was paying him not to do anything with his land for that show he had called Clarkson's Farm or something. I wonder when it started to hurt him so he started to pay attention...

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

In the show, he started farming as a little side project during the pandemic. But he realised how much it sucked and how hard it was for people for which it is the sole source of income.

He's tried to help his neighbours with the shops and restaurants. I don't know how much of it is propaganda or not but it seems genuine given his recent public statements about it.

If a stubborn bastard like Clarkson can change his mind about stuff like that, it's always good.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sgtlion@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

Workers are being exploited??!? Quickly, someone write this down!

[–] xwolpertinger@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the man who punched somebody in the face when service workers went home and he was huuuungy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He must have farted and the air bubble allowed him to get a glimpse of the outside world.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope way worse, he's only realising and bringing this up because he owns a farm.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Oh. The fart was just him talking out of his ass like usual.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm not a farmer, I'm not a baker, I'm just a bread eater, but even I knew that 1kg was way too much wheat for a single loaf of bread. Turns out, yup. 1kg makes 2 loaves.

How does that change things? Well it means a loaf of bread contains 12.5p of flour, not 25p. So, instead of a loaf from a grocery store being about 5x as much as the price of the flour it contains, it's 10x as much.

Having said that, This isn't just a "capitalism" thing. There are many steps between the farmer selling raw wheat and a loaf of bread appearing on a store shelf. Many of them are unchanged since ancient times. I'm sure baker in the Middle Ages charged enough for his loaves of bread that he'd make a reasonable profit and that was centuries before capitalism was a thing.

In the modern world there are different facilities for every step. There's transportation which costs something at multiple stages. There's winnowing and milling the flour. There's buying and shipping the other ingredients. There's mixing the dough. There's baking the dough. There's packaging (and possibly slicing) the bread. And finally, there's the grocery store. To be useful, a grocery store basically has to be in a built-up area, which means high real-estate and related costs. It also needs to make enough margin to pay people to stock the shelves and cashiers to sell the loaves. The only truly modern part from all that that didn't exist in the Middle Ages is sales and marketing. Paying to send out emails or a flyer or whatever to advertise their items. My guess is that most of those steps operate on razor thin margins and make up for it by doing huge quantities.

Now, it's true that the system has flaws and inefficiencies. One glaring example is the lack of competition at many stages in many countries. In Canada, there are so few grocery store chains that the existing ones were able to literally fix the price of bread. So, of course when that happens both customers and farmers get squeezed.

I wonder if there ever was a "golden age of farming" when farming was a comfortable lifestyle. It seems to me that it has always been a very difficult career. If anything, it's probably at its best now under "capitalism". That isn't to say it's an easy job now, just that as difficult and stressful as it is now, it was even worse in the past.

It would be interesting though, just as an intellectual exercise, to imagine a perfectly fair world to figure out what the perfectly fair ratio is between the price of wheat and the price of a loaf of bread on the store shelf. If everybody were paid the exact same rate for their labour, and there were no excess profits generated that went to owners / landlords, how much of the final price of a loaf of bread on a store shelf should come from the raw ingredients of wheat, water, yeast, oil? How much goes to the baker? How much to the delivery drivers? How much to the shelf stockers and cashiers? Imagine it's a wood-fired oven, how much of the price of a loaf of bread goes to a lumberjack, even though their involvement in the whole process is really indirect?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've not watched anything this person has been in, but every time I see him sharing his thoughts and opinions in publication he seems like a genuinely incurious, blathering moron.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Now imagine him shouting "SPEED!" and "POWER!" a bunch and being totally stubborn and you've got about 90% of his TV work

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Honestly, I fucking like Clarkson.

Is he sometimes obnoxious? Yeah. Wrong? Definitely.

But like the role he's playing he's playing fucking amazingly. He's an entertainment person who doesn't have an entirely closed mind even though there's definitely a lot of shit in it. And he isn't overly political. Like he understands he can influence opinions a bit but he would never try to become a real politician. Would he?

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He’s a racist, he assaults people over sandwiches and is a vile, right wing piece of shit. Glad you’re a fan of that.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Glad you’re a fan of that.

No, I'm not a fan of "that." I said I like Clarkson. I can like a pesron and disagree with them. If he was genuinely trying to be some sort of politican then I wouldn't, but now he's more or less just an average tier UK media personality.

Like I said, he's often obnoxious and wrong. But aside from punching that guy at BBC and being ideologically stuck in the 90's (which he basically does more or less for humour, but you can't do that for humour all the time without believing in it a little.)

I don't know. I get sort of nostalgia from laughing with that rude cunt. And I do mean "with" more than "at".

He gives sort of the vibes I had when I was little kid and dad still seemed cool. He turned out to be a somewhat stubborn pseudointellectual very stuck in conservative ways and not at all open minded. Compared to my late dad, Clarkson is pretty openminded.

load more comments (2 replies)

Idk. I live around vile, right wing peices of shit so I see and have to interact with them daily. I've seen some real nasty stuff. And I'm not saying everything Clarkson says is great and right, b he is pretty fun to watch even if I am rooting against him most the time.

Literally the whole time I warch his farming show I'm rooting for Caleb while calling Clarkson an idiot. Like I said, I don't know why it's entertaining, but I believe OP is correct

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I fully expect Jeremy Clarkson to have never baked a loaf of bread in his life.

I'll occasionally bake a loaf of bread, here in my home kitchen. I can't do it with only wheat flour, I need water, salt, sugar and oil as well. So I have to pay my municipal waterworks, a salt miner, a sugar beet farmer, a rapeseed farmer, a wheat farmer, and whatever you call a yeast maker, plus their adjacent industries (I don't by sugar beets, I buy refined granular sugar, etc) and multiple truck and train drivers who move all of those goods in their various states of manufacture around the continent.

Then I've got to bake it, I have an electric oven so now the local energy concern gets their cut. It's that, or get a gas oven and cook with natural gas (fossil fuel methane), or misuse my backyard grill and cook with fossil fuel propane, or get out my axe, fell a tree and build a fire, which is labor intensive on my part.

Sometimes, watching Jeremy's Farm, there's an amount of "I didn't think it would take this much knowledge or skill." Because jackasses like me with 40 square feet of vegetable garden and some packets of seeds from the home center manage to make food. How hard can it be to scale that up to hundreds of acres? Modern farmers need a bachelor's degree, you need to know about plants and animals and soil and all manner of shit to be a farmer. "Put seeds in ground, plants grow." Yes, but actually no.

Sometimes it's "He's still The Orangutan from Top Gear." He buys a tractor that's way too big and then struggles to drive it, lol.

A lot of times it's "I don't think rich TV man actually understands how society works, people have just done shit for him his entire life."

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

"Mind you I'm just a simple country farmer, but..."

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Clarkson is going to Waitrose to get fancy bread. Aldi sell it for 45p. 25p to the farmer leaves just 20p which is split between transport, processing and what ever profit Aldi are taking out of it.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

Clarkson not knowing the price of bread is one hardly a surprise.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] filtoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the same Jeremy Clarkson who thinks that young people should work the fields, paid for with taxes, as part of a National Service scheme, right?

What a bell end!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›