DarkCloud

Yeah I'm not doing this internet debate bro shit with you. I said what I said, my opinion on Nazism isn't up for debate. But also I got better things to do. Bye.

Meybe dey dum s'all I sayin.

The equivalent of political spam mail.

"my" version is for when the Nazis have already taken power and are killing people. But I get it, you disagree with the actions of WW2 resistance movements...

...they happened AFTER institutions had fallen (hence, "late"), and people were being killed. So no, resistance movements aren't "killing the patient" the patient is already dying by the time they emmerge.

Popper is right about institutional power beforehand (protecting society from fascism "early"). I'm right about violent resistance movements once fascism is actively destroying institutions and killing people (then resistance movements must start protecting society).

Where is Go, I'd like to pass it.

I'd call this the early version, the one practiced by responsible institutions before fascism takes over. The late version being done by the people and their allies only after the fascists have already started to destroy the institutions and perpetuate violence.

It can be difficult to tell when is the right time, but yes, when it falls to the mob to enact (closer to the version I've laid out), the fascists have probably have gained too much ground.

Israel? Backtracking on their word? Nnoooo? \s

Yes, fascism negates the rights of the fascists. It has to in order to protect free society.

It's call the Paradox of Tolerance, and is very difficult for centrist liberals to understand.

The faster you string fascists up, the better off society will be. The body? Who cares, do what you want with it.

It's not fascist, to be "fascist against fascism".

Mort-guage = death's pledge. Get in guys, we're going to make the banks RICH!

Great stripper name.