My apartment building caught fire once. Some drunk had been smoking in the cellars in winter.
Barely noticed it in the fourth floor, a bit of smell, that's all.
The whole cellar floor burned. Fire department didn't even get people from above the third floor to go out due to smoke inhalation.
It's pretty much the same with all fires I can find in the news.
Finnish building regs are a bit different. For one you can't get through apartment doors without powertools. They're also good at isolating fire due two doors at the entrance, properly sealed.
So we don't have two staircases.
We worry more about preventing the fire from spreading instead of what to do if gets uncontrollable. Philosophical difference, really, not saying one approach is better than the other.

You've just no idea how ignorant you are? :D Yes, you specifically connected it to the concept. Negative or positive, doesn't matter. It shows how you conceptualise the idea.
That's why it's so wrong.
Empiricism would constitute both descriptive and prescriptive language, only prescriptive language less so. What you're trying to do is prescribe rules to language, and because you don't even understand what youre doing, you don't even have the words for it. Which is why you're now pathetically trying to pretend you knew those words before I pointed this out to you.
It's a good comparison to flat earthers, because you're equally ignorant of your own ignorance. It's a veery different subject, but youre still quite as unable to understand what you understand as they are.
Oh yeah "I no longer take you seriously, goodbye" as if that isn't the mating cry of every fucking moron proved utterly incorrect and who has to run away in shame.