Dasus

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I know it's not, jackass. That's why I said it doesn't apply

You've just no idea how ignorant you are? :D Yes, you specifically connected it to the concept. Negative or positive, doesn't matter. It shows how you conceptualise the idea.

That's why it's so wrong.

Empiricism would constitute both descriptive and prescriptive language, only prescriptive language less so. What you're trying to do is prescribe rules to language, and because you don't even understand what youre doing, you don't even have the words for it. Which is why you're now pathetically trying to pretend you knew those words before I pointed this out to you.

It's a good comparison to flat earthers, because you're equally ignorant of your own ignorance. It's a veery different subject, but youre still quite as unable to understand what you understand as they are.

Oh yeah "I no longer take you seriously, goodbye" as if that isn't the mating cry of every fucking moron proved utterly incorrect and who has to run away in shame.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

My apartment building caught fire once. Some drunk had been smoking in the cellars in winter.

Barely noticed it in the fourth floor, a bit of smell, that's all.

The whole cellar floor burned. Fire department didn't even get people from above the third floor to go out due to smoke inhalation.

It's pretty much the same with all fires I can find in the news.

Finnish building regs are a bit different. For one you can't get through apartment doors without powertools. They're also good at isolating fire due two doors at the entrance, properly sealed.

So we don't have two staircases.

We worry more about preventing the fire from spreading instead of what to do if gets uncontrollable. Philosophical difference, really, not saying one approach is better than the other.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

that empiricism doesn't apply to language

The fact that you don't understand how badly you're misusing those terms instead of talking about prescriptivism and descriptivism is what shows how little you know.

It's not "empicisim" you dolt, which you'd know if you had any understanding of the subject.

Now you're trying to use the terms, but fail hard.

I never even argued there's even a single prescriptive rule, and I never would, because unlike you, this isn't the first time I'm hearing the terms and I thus don't make prescriptive arguments. You can look at my comment, it's not been edited.

Point out a single prescriptive rule I even remotely imply. Oh there isn't one?

How odd.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (5 children)

I think you're proving my point, tbh. You didn't properly read my comment and you're going on about "empiricism of language", which means you don't understand the terms "prescriptive" / "descriptive".

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

If people actually read the comments they reply to ffs

Also the difference you're trying to explain is called prescriptivism vs descriptivism

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

I didn't say it does. Language is not prescriptive. I'm just wondering if this is as much a scam as Flat Earth. Insofar that I doubt the sincerity of people saying that, but I realise that might just be because I'm biased for some reason.

I just have never heard anyone saying "jif" and hearing it makes me think of a semi-computer-illiterate boomer who's reading a file-ending aloud to their nephew while never having heard anyone say it out loud.

Again, I realise that's probably not true, but it's the mental image I get.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Thanks, but I don't really know what you mean by backstairs, as most apartments I know just open to the one staircase. It's not way thin, but I'm just saying most of the ones in my city were wider and thicker. The ones which exist, that is. There's only some of them left in the center and other apartment buildings are basic concrete shits.

My point is rather that it needn't be a bank or anything like that to be somewhat fancy, that used to be in style... some time. Early 20th century, maybe?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

In Nordic languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Finnish), 'Y' is always a vowel sound, similar to saying English "ee" (like in "week") but with tightly rounded lips, often described as a "duck face" or a mix between "ee" and "oo". It's a high, front, rounded vowel (IPA: /y/ or /yː/), distinct from English 'Y' and varies slightly in length (short vs. long) depending on the following consonants.

Like in "Ymir"

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (11 children)

You're assuming "the public" has reached a uniform consensus, which it certainly hasn't.

I have literally never heard someone say "jif" outside of an online post claiming people do.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

We're not anywhere near that point yet.

Never have I ever heard anyone saying "jif" outside of a humouristic clip / antagonistic post online.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That's pronounced "yif", actually.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Lol kinda basic older apartment building made of stone, I think you might be American, lol.

Those stairs aren't even that thick, tbh.

I do get the vibe you're talking about, but honestly the stone buildings in my city have wider and more elaborate staircases even when they never had any sort od business in the building. I'd love an apartment in one of those, if they weren't solely in the center of the city, because the thick stone walls in them make it so you can hardly hear anything your neighbour is doing. Also the ceilings are tall af.

 

Pro-Kremlin propagandists are employing a range of disinformation tactics to deceive Ukrainians, including emotional manipulation, threats, and the creation of fake media outlets and AI-generated visuals. Notably, during the monitoring period, the primary strategy of these propagandists has shifted towards demoralising Ukrainians and spreading widespread discouragement

 

More news like this and less about orange clowns.

Wish the world made sense.

 

Published on 30 Sept 2025

Siberia is a very unique piece of territory that few people truly understand. Due to Russia's war against Ukraine, some interesting trends have emerged in Siberia. In this video, I draw a line through Siberia's dark history, from the Russian Empire, to the Soviet Union, to the Russian Federation. I ask the questions "Would Siberia ever want to secede, and if so, could they?" Then, to tie it all off, I bring China into the picture. Whatever happens, one thing is clear - history in the making is far more fascinating than we ever imagined.

 

The agency said the source of the interference had been traced to Russian territory, and also affected shipping. Other European nations have accused Russia of being behind the jamming, which Moscow denies.

 

North Karelia force says fence dividing Finland and Russia is no Berlin Wall – but it is now a key geopolitical faultline

... In an attempt to strike a note of optimism, he added: “We found a solution in 1944 and I’m sure that we will be able to find a solution in 2025.”

Matti Pitkäniitty, the commander of the North Karelia border guard district, believes illegal border crossings involving Russian defectors are likely to become a growing problem. Pointing to a gap in the vegetation where an old Finnish country lane passed through before the border was redrawn in 1940 after the Russo-Finnish war, resulting in Helsinki ceding part of Karelia, Pitkäniitty said most civilians trying to cross illegally preferred to stick to roads, limiting the number of potential routes.

“People are afraid of those thick forests here,” he said. But this would not be an issue for a Russian military professional trying to flee the war in Ukraine. “Now, one of the risks we are facing are the military-trained personnel fleeing the war. They of course know how to navigate through the woods and how to survive there if they need to stay out of sight for a couple of days.”

 

This is an old picture, I'm working up hunger to cook burgers today but the problem is the hungrier you get the less energy you'll have.

I got some beef and horse that I'm gonna mix, add a little beef fat to make a nice 75/25 mix i think or 80/20.

I want to eat to have energy to cook what a paradox

 

Calling out davriellelouna@lemmy.world obvious spam makes them delete my comment and ban me as a spammer.

A SINGLE COMMENT on their community is spam, but someone posting 10-minute reads every 5-minutes 247/365 isn't spam?

Honestly whoever mod this was, however fking stupid are you to let your emotions take over and admit I'm right by banning me for one comment calling out literal spam?

Ah, Lemmy is occasionally really entertaining (because unlike them, my life isn't on the line so I don't get upset like they seem to :D)

 

They're so insecure that they don't understand that banning me for calling out davriellelouna@lemmy.world as davel@lemmy.ml proxy spam account is "bad faith".

How is it in bad faith? These people don't even understand the words of the rules they're using, lol.

Literally every accusation from them is an admission, and because I called out bad-faith users spamming links, I got banned supposedly for arguing in bad faith.

Feels like lemmy is mostly just russians, honestly, which is understandable as the pathetic fuckers can't engage anyone on any properly moderated forums

 

Don't know who bothers paying for these and why.

Not the best use of money I can think of, lol.

 

I've nothing to add.

 

Like a palms width away from the elbow, on the inside of your right forearm.

So... why do you have them?

 

But browsing active >95% of posts are by a user with literally "bot" in their name.

Might as well be reading the Google feed if I'm going to be reading a specific agenda by something, at least that's based on my interests and I can trust Google to put profit over everything, making their motives clearer than whatever the fuck is going on on Lemmy. (Cough tankies cough cough)

view more: next ›