It's Rimworld, so making hats out of guests is kind of mandatory.
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
136 points (94.2% liked)
Asklemmy
49420 readers
236 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, the human can consent, so that would make it perfectly ethical if they do.
this site uses cookies. To continue, you must agree to the terms and conditions. By hitting agree, you agree to the following.
- blah
- blah blah
- blah
- you consent to being turned in to a hat
- blah
agree?
Blindly hits βAgreeβ.
They consented when they tried to raid me.
Why let baby foreskins go to waste is what I always say.
Wait.... Don't tell me you don't know about the baby foreskin facials???????
Baby foreskin facials are so wasteful. Why smear them on your face once and discard them when you can make a leather thong from them for years of use?
Could you imagine a baby foreskin fanny pack? That way it could hurt everyone involved!
Well in all seriousness, humans can consent and cows can't (or if they can, they have no unambiguous way to communicate this consent to humans), so human leather is more ethical.
And when it's the only way to keep their family from starving, for example, people will consent in droves, securing supply.
I'd donate my body to a Tanner. Cows can't make this choice in a we can understand at least.
Douglas Adams morally safe meat. Cows breed to be smart enough to agree to be food. To the point they will just pop off and off them selves .... But don't worry it will be in a very humane way.... And don't forget to try my rump it's very juicy...
This is from the restaurant at the end of the universe btw
Sourcing leather from humans is always morally correct! You will get 50% off for bringing your whole family in!
Reminds me of a time in biology class
Q: What's a resource everyone has access to?
A: ~~Water~~
Skin.
Depends on the cow and the human.
If a cow is a dick and harming other cows, moral.
If the human lives a modest life and pursues charitable acts to make themself happy, immoral.
I feel like if a child with a similar level of cognition as the cow harms other children, most people will say they have no moral agency yet, and will still see harvesting their leather as immoral.
There are two ways to resolve that inconsistency...
load more comments
(1 replies)
because of the meat industry, i think its more ethical to use leather than let it go to waste. it lasts a long time and can replace a lot of other textiles that would need to be replaced more.
Yeah, just like we should eat more meat. Meat is just a waste product of the leather industry! Eating meat helps stop climate change because then we dont need to eat plants that are mono culture that use up space of trees.
load more comments
(3 replies)
It's ethical i would say, since humans are an invasive species
Jokes like this make me uncomfortable :( there's legit eco fash positions like this. Invasive species rhetoric is bad applied to all species imho, because killing children for some sort of inherited sin seems unreasonable to me.
i forgot people actually think like this π
We do have to ask if Malthusians are really people...
load more comments
(2 replies)
I mean thatβs a screenshot from Rimworld so ethical leather harvesting is a small thing compared to prisoner organ harvesting (Source I play too much Rimworld)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Depends if your pawns get rebuffs for wearing human skin clothes.
Gotta make it a tenet of your tribeβs religion.
please build shelves
Vegan leather. Not made out of vegans. Actually made out of polyurethane: oil: check, microplastics: check, disposable with a short usable life: check!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes!
From the pov of a human or a cow?
Cow leather is more moral in my pov
Or is it about sourcing it from them after their natural death?
Even then cow leather seems more moral
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah yes, I always make everything from both
Gotta do something with dead raiders.
Ask yourself what a cow ever did to you and compare the two
Cut/tan/stain/stamp the rich!
I think dead people don't need their skins. Maybe expand to prisoners, and maybe allow poor people sell their skins for example to fund their children's education etc.
During war times would be very good for the markets to allow skinning deceased soldiers or civilians, this would promote use of some chemical weapons that cause the enemy to asphyxiate or whatever in favour of terrible weapons that rip humans apart.
We could help to solve the issue with overpopulation in developing nations
Shit why haven't we thought of this before????
Human leather bound books!
We already kill cows to eat them. Wearing their skin is just using more of their material.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If people have good tattoos, the skin the tattoo is on should be preserved at death and framed. For family to enjoy.
Thoughts like this are likely how The Church of Euthanasia got started.
view more: next βΊ