Horrified? Most voters, dem or rep, have the exact same mentality around immigration. One is just slightly less ashamed of expressing that mentality than the other.
"Socialism is evil!!!!!"
describes fascism which is literally endgame capitalism
Why is anyone defending her when her take is actually shit?
For one, enabled implies Israel's not the ones doing it.
I don’t care if you know my raw specs if I’m telling you how a game runs in a public forum
It may not be harmful by itself, but combined with other information it can definitely help identify you to your account. It could easily be the final piece of information that enabled you to be doxxed.
Loss of privacy is cumulative, like radiation.
there were thin (~2mm) sticker-type Bluetooth tags [...] No battery, just a passive coil that could be found with Bluetooth signal and an app that shows how close it is.
Sounds kind of like UHF RFID, which are common in places like warehouses and can be done at a distance, but even higher frequency?
I imagine range was a huge issue. Unless you have an extremely powerful bluetooth tranceiver and a very high gain antenna (i.e. not a phone, a professional radio system), the inverse square law will mean you won't have enough energy to activate the electronics in the tag after a fairly short distance. Would probably work for finding something in your house though.
The core philosophy of how the country was founded is the same: impose a certain culture and way of life on peoples who wanted nothing to do with you, kick them off the land they've lived on for generations and move your own people there. And it's not like we didn't commit our own genocide, why are there so few Indigenous people nowadays? Canada is one of the oldest colonial countries so most of the truly ugly stuff happened long before you or I were born (still, not that long ago), but it is still something Indigenous people are struggling with. Obviously Israel is worse in the present day, obviously Canadians are more apologetic about it, obviously the average Canadian now is not playing nearly as active a role in the colonialism (again, due to most of the ugly stuff happening some time ago), but if you look at histories of countries as a whole it's pretty similar. Also, I was referring to specifially the government of Canada criticizing Israel, because it gives them an excuse not to change how Canada is governed, which in case you haven't noticed is also screwing over non Indigenous Canadians and is absolutely not working for anyone but the rich.
Also to the liberals pearl clutching about "but we need democracy!" not realizing that's what that quote means.
The proletariat is, pretty much by definition, the VAST majority of the people in a society, by far the largest group. The commoners like you and me, working in order to make a living.
Dictatorship can mean what you think it means in that context. Ruling a country by the will of some dictator.
If the proletariat is the dictator, it means ruling a country by the will of the vast majority of the people. That's what democracy is. We can further discuss implementations of it and how well they work (hint: Western democracy works very poorly and is very undemocratic in practice, as you've definitely experienced), but the general concept described by "dictatorship of the proletariat" is democracy.
AKA communism?
Unlike C++ though, explosives usually degrade over time and become less dangerous.
Modifying C++ legacy code is like working on an armed nuke.
Proof by contradiction
view more: next ›
Kind of. They have technology to adapt almost any species to almost any environment, so your low level biological limitations don't matter that much because there are ways to get around them.
If the city was designed for a cat, then yes, not because of climate but mainly because of size logistics, most of the infrastrure is designed for animals much smaller than a polar bear, and while infrastructure designed for large animals do exist even when the city is exclusively inhabited by small animals, the could be few and far between so there could still be accessibility issues. City planners try to work around this by interleaving different sized infrastructure and laying out infrastructure like a fractal: you first evenly distribute infrastructure and housing for the largest size class, then you distrubute infrastrure and housing for the next largest size in between the largest size infrastructure, then do the same for the next size class, and so on. This avoids the "Zootopia style" size-based segregation (i.e. the tiny rodent village that falls apart as soon as a larger animal needs to traverse through it), but it's still not perfect.
Bears are also on the Trophist side and are generally not allowed to just move into Unitist territory without careful vetting to ensure them as an individual will follow Unitist law, so there aren't a lot of bears in cities designed for small animals in general, but if one does get granted migration into a Unitist city, the city planners are obligated to accomodate them to the best of their ability same as any other animal, once you're physically in Unitist territory you have the same rights and access to resources/infrastructure as everyone elss.
It's free because it's publicly owned infrastructure operated by governments. Most essential resources and services in Unitist territory, like food, enzyme supplements, housing, utilities, education, and last but not least transportation, are free by constitution.