HiddenLayer555

And this is the best case scenario. It's either this or they literally think they're meaningless collateral in the West's noble mission to save the world.

Makes sense, FIFA is a corrupt, horrible organisation that's an insult to the game of soccer.

Is that a thing? Men are so threatened by women working that they refuse to read things written by women? If so, I would love to have these people do a double blind study and see if they can actually figure out author genders if not told them.

You know, for science. The chronically intolerant people literally leading us to ruin need to be studied.

For those not in the know, the original post was about how someone kept losing their outdoor cats to coyotes and kept adopting more, so was basically feeding cats to coyotes.

Keep your cats indoors folks, will keep them from killing birds and keep bigger things from killing them. Don't want your pet subjected to the food chain? Don't make them participate in it.

Also, now that I think about it, how did the shelter not blacklist them after the second cat they lost? They kept just giving cats to this person knowing they don't bother to keep them safe?

That argument could hold for freely open source models (and even then there needs to be laws prohibiting copyrighting anything AI generated) but absolutely not closed, for-profit models. Making a profit off someone else's work without their knowledge or permission goes beyond copying into theft.

If we were smart we'd use this opportunity to build up renewable energy infrastructure and wean ourselves off oil.

But we're not. Instead other oil producers like Canada will see dollar signs and ramp up their ecological exploitation to cash in on the crisis. Only to inevitably be completely unprepared when the oil market crashes again.

Head to the prison gymnasium at Nuremberg

Now make the fly VM run DOOM

When will Westerners realize that the common characture of the brainwashed, thought controlled, information controlled, constantly surveiled citizen that we attribute to China/The USSR/etc... IS US?! You clutch your pearls at people in other countries potentially being treated like that but are inclined to do nothing about OUR countries treating US like that.

IDK how common this is, but there are stories of companies that make you work on real production code in the interview. Basically suckering you into free work before they give the position to the boss's cousin or something.

I think a major threat that AI poses to human creative works that almost no one is talking about is the fact that humans are choosing/are forced to be less human as some kind of retaliation against AI. This is one example. I've also seen threads on AskLemmy that's totally reasonable for a human to want to ask for themselves being accused of farming responses for AI training. Certain punctuation marks and grammatical patterns are being stigmatised because AI uses them. I don't have solutions for any of this but at some point you really have to ask, is it really worth it to limit or even stigmatize certain aspects of human creativity because of AI? Even if we assume that all AI is objectively wrong, we've clearly seen that AI development is hardly even inconvenienced by these attempts. Are we not partially fulfilling the prophecy of AI destroying human creativity by actively forcing creative humans to "prove" they're not AI or limiting what they can do creatively because AI happens to also do those things.