HiddenLayer555

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

No rich people are. It takes a certain type of mental state to amass more wealth than you and your family can spend while ignoring your conscience about the people they're exploiting. In the fairly distant future I feel this will be officially identified as a disorder, similar to sociopathy.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As a Chinese person, it doesn't taste better if cooked by someone familiar with it either lol. My parents love it for some reason and have tried to get me to eat it many times.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This will be poetically repeated back to them when the empire falls and Indigenous law takes effect once again.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The bigger question is how you hire UX designers that don't just think about the "X" of the most unskilled, tech illiterate "U"s and force everyone down to that level. The number of times I've seen complex but time saving features taken away under the guise of "simplifying" the interface is infuriating.

"Our dumbest users can't figure out how the existing group select/filter button works on a list of items so go ahead and individually click the checkbox for all 100 items because fuck you." This actually happened with a cloud based service I had to use for work once.

Also the classic "Let's make you click on each list item which opens a new page with the action buttons instead of putting the most common ones on the list itself because we care about how clean the interface looks more than the people who have to do repetitive tasks on each list item."

Also "Error messages are scary so we'll be as vague and condescending as possible and if you actually want to troubleshoot the ten million abstractions we hide behind a single button you can go fuck yourself." And its friend "We made a slick single page web app that only has one URL so you can't send the page you're on to your team members."

Honorable mention to "Instead of cluttering the interface with grayed out buttons, we'll pretend the options you don't have permission to access don't exist to make it as hard as possible to figure out what you're doing wrong or what permission you need to ask IT/your manager for."

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is what I hate about any kind of hobby culture and have always been hesitant to identify as any. The amount of toxicity that comes out of what is supposed to be entertainment is unreal.

So many people demand respect for their esoteric obsessions yet refuse to respect anyone else's. Like, in the end none of it matters so just enjoy what you like doing and let others enjoy what they like doing. Why bother spending your limited time and energy hating on stuff when you can just ignore it?

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Visually pleasing architecture serves the people passing through an area more than the people actually living there. If you live there, even the nicest architecture won't be noticed after the first week or so. It all just fades into the background as your brain optimizes away the unnecessary information.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(leftist) government of British Columbia

As a BC resident, I can tell you that BC's government was never "leftist." Then again that word has been mutated in the US and Canada to mean "anything left of hunting the poor for sport."

Rather than build a series of generic, near-identical stations, they hired different architects for various stations, a decision that netted considerable criticism from the opposition.

Extremely valid critism IMO. How many more stations could they have built with the same budget (barring NIMBYs and shit) if they had built the same stations at each location? Transit funding in Canada is pathetic as it is compared to car infrastructure funding, given the choice between nice looking stations and being able to go to more places on the train, I know which I'd choose.

Also, why isn't the same visual astethetic demand applied to car infrastructure? The nicest highway interchange or parking lot still looks like shit compared to the ugliest transit station. Is it because the people designing car infrastructure know how beneficial reusable, utilitarian design is? Is it not conceivable that the way transit designers get burdened by "it can't look ugly" from the NIMBYs who will never not drive anywhere is one of the systemic problems plaguing car oriented countries like Canada?

Also also, the Millennium Line is as much a glamour project as it is a transportation project. It's right in the name, it was the line built in celebration of the millennium. Socialist countries have glamour projects too, and the Millennium Line definitely looks more in line with how those are designed than the average commieblock. I'm not saying that's inherently wrong or that there's never room for astethetics in public infrastructure, but let's not pretend that the Millennium Line stations are better at providing the actual service of transportation because they're all unique. In fact, I'd argue that Sapperton in particular is awful, with its long narrow skybridge leading to the station and the fact that the platforms are separated by stairs. That's been a constant pain during the construction of the new train yard where you often have to switch trains at Sapperton to get to Lougheed. Looks cool yes, not as cool to actually use. Brentwood station straddles a busy stroad and is also not great to use.

Actually, the setup of having individual side platforms on most Skytrain stations is super annoying because you have to leave the platform, go down a flight of stairs, through the main station concourse (sometimes even leave and reenter the fare gated area), and then back up a flight of stairs just to get to the other side. I get that with this configuration you don't have to break the viaduct into two separate ones just to put a platform in the middle, which saves cost, but if they cared about the actual passenger experience, I think whatever money they paid the architects should have went to building more center platform stations where you can just walk over to the other side. The Expo Line mostly used center platforms, the Millennium line seemingly traded that for nice looking stations.

Finally, BC then decided to use cookiecutter stations with only small variations for every expansion project after that. The stations on the Canada Line, Evergreen, and future Broadway and Langley extensions all look pretty much the same and no one really cares because you stop noticing the architecture by the third or fourth commute.

I'd argue that BC's pitiful transit system currently has the same necessity that gave us commieblocks. Maybe we should look to commieblocks for inspiration on how to build quickly and efficiently because we desperately need a ton of new transit infrastructure as soon as possible.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nation's gonna be real insecure when all its energy infrastructure goes obsolete.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I love how capitalism can't even capital correctly. Housing, transportation, infrastructure, research and education, social services, all pillars of human society that will be in demand forever and have clearly shown time and time again to guarantee long term return even in the most capitalist of systems? No fuck that, give me the latest unproven fad industry, that's never gone wrong before.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I will continue to hate people

You've just demonstrated the biggest reason everyone hates people lol. We hate people because people act like you as soon as they disagree on something. Zero attempt to learn from others or even defend your own opinions that you feel so strongly about, just "fuck you and everyone who agrees with you if you don't tell me I'm absolutely right."

Also, just curious, do you also hate yourself when you say you hate "people?" Or is everyone else the problem and you're the only good person in your mind?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40689539

I decided to switch to NixOS on my desktop and so far it's been great, I love being able to build out my config in the Nix file, but there is one thing I've not been able to figure out how to change. After a period of inactivity, the computer suspends (or hibernates?) and basically turns off (all the fans and lights turn off and it disconnects from the network, I don't know if it's saving the state in RAM of the drive). How do I get it to not do that and just lock the desktop and turn off the screen after inactivity? I'm using KDE Plasma and I've tried different kinds of configurations that build successfully but still don't prevent it from going offline.

 

I decided to switch to NixOS on my desktop and so far it's been great, I love being able to build out my config in the Nix file, but there is one thing I've not been able to figure out how to change. After a period of inactivity, the computer suspends (or hibernates?) and basically turns off (all the fans and lights turn off and it disconnects from the network, I don't know if it's saving the state in RAM of the drive). How do I get it to not do that and just lock the desktop and turn off the screen after inactivity? I'm using KDE Plasma and I've tried different kinds of configurations that build successfully but still don't prevent it from going offline.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40568699

After some consideration, I've decided to replace my consumer router at home with an OpnSense box I control, and use the consumer router as just an access point. The model I have doesn't seem to support OpenWrt but the default firmware supports access point mode complete with mesh functionality, otherwise I would have just installed OpenWrt on it. I still like the consumer router's mesh Wi-Fi capabilities, especially the wireless range extender, but don't trust it enough to let it be the actual root device separating my home network from the open internet. My reasoning is that by having it behind the OpnSense router, I can monitor and detect if it's exfiltrating any "analytics" data and block them. Worst case scenario I realize it's too noisy with the analytics and buy a proper business grade access point, or an M.2 Wi-Fi 6 card with some beefy antennas.

Now I'm trying to decide if I should use one of my old mini PCs or if I should get a brand new one with an up to date processor and microcode. The biggest reason I don't want the consumer router to be the root device anymore is because I don't know how well they patch their firmware against attackers constantly scanning the internet for vulnerable devices. I imagine an open source router OS with tons of eyes on it and used by actual professionals would inherently be more secure than whatever proprietary cost cut consumer firmware my current router has. I've already picked out a suitable mini PC I'm not using and the reason I even started down this rabbit hole is because I have it, but after thinking more about it, I'm worried that whatever security I gain might be undermined by the underlying hardware being old and outdated, especially since the processor is definitely pre Spectre/Meltdown and I doubt it's still getting microcode or firmware updates.

Again, the reason I ask is because the internet really wants me to think old disused computers are perfect for converting into routers, and I really don't want to buy a new computer if I don't have to. How important is the hardware for a router? Can I expect OpnSense to have sufficient security on pretty much any hardware or will a sufficiently old computer completely defeat the purpose of even switching away from the consumer router?

Alternatively, I also have another mini PC with a Ryzen 5 from 2020, and I can reposition it from its current job to router duty, though it would definitely be overkill and wasting the hardware capabilities. Would that be substantially more secure than an older Intel processor?

I also have a Raspberry Pi 4 I can put OpenWrt on, would that somehow be more secure than an older x64 computer?

 

After some consideration, I've decided to replace my consumer router at home with an OpnSense box I control, and use the consumer router as just an access point. The model I have doesn't seem to support OpenWrt but the default firmware supports access point mode complete with mesh functionality, otherwise I would have just installed OpenWrt on it. I still like the consumer router's mesh Wi-Fi capabilities, especially the wireless range extender, but don't trust it enough to let it be the actual root device separating my home network from the open internet. My reasoning is that by having it behind the OpnSense router, I can monitor and detect if it's exfiltrating any "analytics" data and block them. Worst case scenario I realize it's too noisy with the analytics and buy a proper business grade access point, or an M.2 Wi-Fi 6 card with some beefy antennas.

Now I'm trying to decide if I should use one of my old mini PCs or if I should get a brand new one with an up to date processor and microcode. The biggest reason I don't want the consumer router to be the root device anymore is because I don't know how well they patch their firmware against attackers constantly scanning the internet for vulnerable devices. I imagine an open source router OS with tons of eyes on it and used by actual professionals would inherently be more secure than whatever proprietary cost cut consumer firmware my current router has. I've already picked out a suitable mini PC I'm not using and the reason I even started down this rabbit hole is because I have it, but after thinking more about it, I'm worried that whatever security I gain might be undermined by the underlying hardware being old and outdated, especially since the processor is definitely pre Spectre/Meltdown and I doubt it's still getting microcode or firmware updates.

Again, the reason I ask is because the internet really wants me to think old disused computers are perfect for converting into routers, and I really don't want to buy a new computer if I don't have to. How important is the hardware for a router? Can I expect OpnSense to have sufficient security on pretty much any hardware or will a sufficiently old computer completely defeat the purpose of even switching away from the consumer router?

Alternatively, I also have another mini PC with a Ryzen 5 from 2020, and I can reposition it from its current job to router duty, though it would definitely be overkill and wasting the hardware capabilities. Would that be substantially more secure than an older Intel processor?

I also have a Raspberry Pi 4 I can put OpenWrt on, would that somehow be more secure than an x64 computer?

 

My VPN provider has a limit to how many concurrent connections I can have, and a workaround I've been using is to run the Wireguard client as a daemon (wg-quick@my-wg-config) and a Squid proxy on my home server, and point my local devices to the HTTP proxy port, which will route the traffic through the Wireguard connection. However, this has broken randomly multiple times in the past few months, where it will randomly decide to just not allow the server to connect to ANY internet address while the Wireguard connection is active, and no amount of network or routing table configuration changes fixes it. The Squid proxy works fine as far as I can tell, it's just the Wireguard connection that's failing, which doesn't even allow a ping to an internet address from the server's terminal (which doesn't go through the proxy). The only way I've been able to fix it is to completely reinstall the OS on the server and reconfigure everything from scratch, which is annoying and also only works until it randomly decides to break again. This makes me think I'm doing something wrong.

Is there a more "proper" or widely supported way of routing internet traffic on local devices through a single Wireguard connection? Everything I could read online says running Wireguard with an HTTP proxy server is the way to do it, but it clearly isn't very reliable or my computer is just defective in some weird intermittent way? The server is running Fedora Server 43. I've also checked for SELinux denials but there are none.

I'm aware of wireproxy but it uses a SOCKS5 proxy which is not as widely supported as an HTTP proxy and a lot of my devices (mainly phones) won't be able to access it. Also I'd like the server itself to also use the VPN, not just the devices on the proxy.

Does anyone have more experience with this and can give some advice?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40388903

I have a science-fantasy world with intelligent non-anthro animals living in harmony, which I've posted some lore about this in the past. Think "communist non-anthro Zootopia with sci-fi technology." This is something that I've been thinking about for a while and combines my interests in worldbuilding and software. I want to create a fictional social media platform for the animals in my world, and stage fictional threads in the typical Reddit/Lemmy format discussing news and politics taking place within the world. Then post screenshots here with context explaining what is happening. I just thought this might be a more fun way of sharing lore about my world than just the articles themselves, almost like an ARG. I'll also be able to introduce some of my main narrative characters through their social media presence.

On the technical side of things, I don't know if I want to compile and spin up a local Lemmy instance at home and actually stage accounts and posts on it. But actually logging in and out of different accounts sounds like way more work than necessary so I could also just take the Lemmy UI and add my own mock thread data to it. Or, I could write my own code for a completely fictional GUI, since I don't want to just use the default Lemmy UI and break the illusion. The second and third options might be more important if I want to make this an actual ARG and host a website for it, since in that case I don't actually want people to sign up and post.

I would love some feedback in general on this idea, and maybe gauge interest on if this is something people would like to see.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40388903

I have a science-fantasy world with intelligent non-anthro animals living in harmony, which I've posted some lore about this in the past. Think "communist non-anthro Zootopia with sci-fi technology." This is something that I've been thinking about for a while and combines my interests in worldbuilding and software. I want to create a fictional social media platform for the animals in my world, and stage fictional threads in the typical Reddit/Lemmy format discussing news and politics taking place within the world. Then post screenshots here with context explaining what is happening. I just thought this might be a more fun way of sharing lore about my world than just the articles themselves, almost like an ARG. I'll also be able to introduce some of my main narrative characters through their social media presence.

On the technical side of things, I don't know if I want to compile and spin up a local Lemmy instance at home and actually stage accounts and posts on it. But actually logging in and out of different accounts sounds like way more work than necessary so I could also just take the Lemmy UI and add my own mock thread data to it. Or, I could write my own code for a completely fictional GUI, since I don't want to just use the default Lemmy UI and break the illusion. The second and third options might be more important if I want to make this an actual ARG and host a website for it, since in that case I don't actually want people to sign up and post.

I would love some feedback in general on this idea, and maybe gauge interest on if this is something people would like to see.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40388903

I have a science-fantasy world with intelligent non-anthro animals living in harmony, which I've posted some lore about this in the past. Think "communist non-anthro Zootopia with sci-fi technology." This is something that I've been thinking about for a while and combines my interests in worldbuilding and software. I want to create a fictional social media platform for the animals in my world, and stage fictional threads in the typical Reddit/Lemmy format discussing news and politics taking place within the world. Then post screenshots here with context explaining what is happening. I just thought this might be a more fun way of sharing lore about my world than just the articles themselves, almost like an ARG. I'll also be able to introduce some of my main narrative characters through their social media presence.

On the technical side of things, I don't know if I want to compile and spin up a local Lemmy instance at home and actually stage accounts and posts on it. But actually logging in and out of different accounts sounds like way more work than necessary so I could also just take the Lemmy UI and add my own mock thread data to it. Or, I could write my own code for a completely fictional GUI, since I don't want to just use the default Lemmy UI and break the illusion. The second and third options might be more important if I want to make this an actual ARG and host a website for it, since in that case I don't actually want people to sign up and post.

I would love some feedback in general on this idea, and maybe gauge interest on if this is something people would like to see.

 

I have a science-fantasy world with intelligent non-anthro animals living in harmony, which I've posted some lore about this in the past. Think "communist non-anthro Zootopia with sci-fi technology." This is something that I've been thinking about for a while and combines my interests in worldbuilding and software. I want to create a fictional social media platform for the animals in my world, and stage fictional threads in the typical Reddit/Lemmy format discussing news and politics taking place within the world. Then post screenshots here with context explaining what is happening. I just thought this might be a more fun way of sharing lore about my world than just the articles themselves, almost like an ARG. I'll also be able to introduce some of my main narrative characters through their social media presence.

On the technical side of things, I don't know if I want to compile and spin up a local Lemmy instance at home and actually stage accounts and posts on it. But actually logging in and out of different accounts sounds like way more work than necessary so I could also just take the Lemmy UI and add my own mock thread data to it. Or, I could write my own code for a completely fictional GUI, since I don't want to just use the default Lemmy UI and break the illusion. The second and third options might be more important if I want to make this an actual ARG and host a website for it, since in that case I don't actually want people to sign up and post.

I would love some feedback in general on this idea, and maybe gauge interest on if this is something people would like to see.

 

I personally never really considered "Chinese knockoff" a negative term because those products still fill a niche that is beneficial to the consumer, usually very low cost entry level offerings the "brand name" companies don't bother making. Now that the "brand names" have straight up said they don't intend on making entire categories of consumer products anymore, this could be a great opportunity for Chinese companies.

There's a stereotype of Chinese brands being "low quality" which obviously isn't always true to begin with, but even if we assume it is, given the choice between a maybe lower quality product you still get to own and none at all, I think the decision is pretty clear, at least for me.

With shortages of things like GPUs, third party Chinese manufacturers can't easily jump in to fill the gap because those chips are complex and proprietary both in the silicon design and the interfaces/APIs they need to work with, so the barrier to entry is quite high. Even if they straight up reverse engineered and "stole" Nividia's designs (which I personally don't even consider unethical), they'll have a hard time legally selling them in Western markets because Nividia will sue them. And even then China is making incredible strides at developing their own GPUs from the ground up. Meanwhile, DRAM and SSDs are much simpler than a GPU and there are already Chinese offerings of both on places like Aliexpress and even Amazon (not just using brand name chips on their own board, though that's still more common, I'm certain there are also in-house Chinese DRAM and flash chips from small firms), I don't see a reason they can't just ramp up production and cash in on the shortage in the West. Though there could still be details I'm not aware of, the way I see is that all they have to do is offer something reasonably reliable and less expensive than the ridiculous prices "brand name" parts are going for nowadays (not to mention when the existing stock sells out and are no longer restocked) and I can't imagine them not getting customers looking to build custom PCs for cheap.

Again, I personally don't give a shit if they "stole" designs from the brand names or not, because I consider stealing intellectual property from billion dollar corporations to be morally neutral.

So, people more knowledgeable on how electronics manufacturing and supply chains work, do you think we'll see Chinese brands becoming more prominent in the Western consumer computer parts market now that the likes of Samsung, SKHynix, and Micron straight up don't even want to sell to consumers anymore? Or is the paradigm of buying parts to build your own computer just cooked?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40244806

Yes, people, including children, are being disappeared to concentration camps but the real victims are the white suburban moms privileged enough to offload their snot nosed brats to other people now being forced to take care of their spawn themselves. Those are the people we should feel bad for, surely.

 

Yes, people, including children, are being disappeared to concentration camps but the real victims are the white suburban moms privileged enough to offload their snot nosed brats to other people now being forced to take care of their spawn themselves. Those are the people we should feel bad for, surely.

view more: next ›