Since it's on a downswing, wouldn't it technically be a "valley" instead of a "plateau"?
OK and they don't have to cater in a misogynistic way, but they do, and I'm criticizing that decision.
We can leave it at the same volume. Its not "all men are bad" even, no need to make things up, its embedded misogyny, even perpetuated by women at times.
The question why is "lesbian" porn, in the "straight" section?
Why would a straight woman on a porn site expect to see lesbian porn when they select to see straight porn? It's a double standard.
If men (or anyone else) wanted to watch lesbian porn, there's nothing wrong with that, it just seems out of place in the straight section, cause that's not what it is.
Why?
From the perspective of pornography distributors and consumers, all womens' bodies exist for their sexual gratification. This includes lesbians ofc.
It's simply manifestation of misogyny.
Yeah I know, a civil war would be another escalation. I'm saying that the commentary should respect that fact, and respect the fact that if it pops off in 2026, the bad guys win 10/10 times because no preparation has been done whatsoever.
- Europe needs to stop willingly subjugating itself to the US for its own good.
- I guess if you don't have anything at stake it isn't up to you to navigate the consequences of a civil war. The US needs to decline for the good of the world, but unfortunately for it, it's unable to produce competent leadership, so the process is more rough than it needs to be
I think this has been proposed before, but i think that the instance with the most users (whatever it may be) should be deprioritized on join-lemmy, for the health of the federation. Its not like people won't come into contact with the largest instance like right away anyway (and could just kale a new account if they really want to)
Everyone read "Custer Died For Your Sins" pls
It's a settler-colonial project built on the exploitation of stolen land and exploited labor. As true in the 1700s as it is today. It isn't possible for this sort of entity to mantain stability once the supply of land and people to exploit runs out.
"Prosecute every employee of ICE" is the center-left position. "Abolish ICE" is centerism and they can't even bother with that.
Neither of these are extremist positions and are fully compatible with a liberal democracy. I just want to see these people given a fair trial and punished appropriately for their violations of the law.
"Defund ICE" is already a right-wing position.
No I know, just being pedantic about it for fun