this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
396 points (96.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27135 readers
3699 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyway, please stay safe and don't be afraid to defend yourself.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

She couldn't dope a scope if her life depended on it

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

More on this splendid human being:

In now deleted tweets from 2015, it’s clear Rep. Maddox has always held racist beliefs. In an October 2015 tweet, Maddox responded to someone calling President Barack Obama a “coon” by saying that “Obama is not black. He is of African ancestry, not sharing the Black American heritage or experience.” 

In a March 2015 tweet, Maddox said that “childhood sexual assault and neglect” was the reason for homosexuality and that she blamed the parents and LGBTQ people for their sexual preferences.  

In a January 2015 tweet she claimed Islam is a “faith about destruction” and that there are no Islamic “hospitals, orphanages or universities.” 

She's a genuine shit-person. 100% real human excrement propped up with modern technology to walk and talk sorta like a real human being!

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I was about to ask who even is that? But now I’d rather forget.

New Jersey people need new glasses...

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 hours ago

This bitch gonna shoot down actual manned aircraft, judging by the reports

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

She should have spent that money on kitchen decoration, or a hairdo.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 36 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Please, do NOT shoot at airborn targets, or any target where your are not certain a missed shot will safely land in an empty area.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Knowing the golden rules? No, that sounds like communism or something.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Did not a bunch of People shot at a Tornado, at one point?

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Also shooting down a drone counts as shooting down an actual airplane, which is like, a super felony. So probably just don't.

Just fly your own drone and ram into their drone. Then you pull an uno reverse and claim they hit you first. FAA aint touching this, and cops are too lazy to do anything and will say its "Civil Matter"

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Also, the drone falling could hit someone or something. So seriously, don't.

[–] GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago

Yep, that's why birdshot is basically the only safe ammo that can be shot into the air unless you're in the middle of the ocean or something.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 20 points 15 hours ago

If it flies, it spies

Birdwatching goes both ways

c/birdsarentreal

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 12 points 15 hours ago
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 42 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

GovCo owns the drones. The simple fact that they haven't shot them down means they own them.

This is a distraction. It's to distract people because for some reason there was a sudden unexpected explosion of class consciousness.

Stop talking about the fucking govt drones. Keep scaring billionaires.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The one I saw a picture of was a manned helicopter. (Flying in a legal area too .. which is why they aren't being shot down near a military base, because if they were a threat, in air they weren't allowed to fly in... They would be intercepted or shot down)

[–] FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz 171 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Anyone who thinks they stand a chance against drones with a gun hasn't been paying attention to what's happening in Ukraine.

Gonna pew pew a CEO in the back? Sure, guns work for that.

Trying to save your own life against a fast and agile target that needs way less precision than you to be effective and probably never even presents a target? Nah mate, you're fucked.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 95 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (28 children)

There are some, handheld firearms that are used as a last-ditch / cheap anti drone solution in Ukraine, by both sides.

Drum roll.....

https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2024/analysis-shotguns-emerge-as-a-frontline-defense-against-drones-in-evolving-military-and-security-tactics

Its shotguns.

Because they have a spread of multiple shot pellets instead of a single bullet.

Fucking obviously duh, they've been used to hunt small, evasive birds routinely, everywhere, for like 150+ years.

Hunting a nimble flying object with a sniper rifle is a laughably absurd idea.

This actual post from this woman is so stupid I would have thought it was from a 12 year old whose only experience with guns is from CoD... but nope, its a 50ish(?) year old woman.

Guess she's never hunted birds, and thinks its just the same as hunting deer or hogs or something???

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Old people can be stupid too :-)

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 41 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Shotguns just can’t stop winning

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Also, people seem to be forgetting that shotguns don't only shoot shot or slugs:

https://www.lesslethal.com/products/12-gauge/als12skymi-5-detail

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did not know an actual anti drone, net round existed!

Not especially useful against drones, nor open warfare, there are also less than lethal rubber rounds...

... and a self contained taser round:

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/taser-x12-xrep-a-taser-in-a-shotgun-shell/

I don't know if the xrep is still actually manufactured though.

Oh right! Dragon's breath! Illegal in half the country!

https://www.firequest.com/G12-113.html

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

People have been basically homebrewing shot gun shells since shotguns have existed. Everything from flachetes, to bolos, to XREP - even idiots that have shoved a shell full of .17 hmr rounds to see what happens. I 100% know that homebrewed anti drone shells exist and range from tying fishing line around pellets, to just launching a rope.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh yeah, I was trying to stick to retailed products, but yes, homebrew shotgun rounds have been around for basically as long as shotguns.

Another kind of homebrew shot is coin shot:

https://www.alloutdoor.com/2020/06/17/shooting-pennies-shotgun/

I've heard anecdotally that people have been doing that for quite a while.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 30 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

Now here's a thought... What about using drones to "take care of" a CEO? The risk of being caught would be lower, as you can be located hundreds of meters away or more. It's also relatively easy to acquire a drone, and you can make explosives with stuff you can buy at the hardware store.

(Disclaimer: This is just a thought experiment, I'm not dumb enough to try this, don't worry FBI :3)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 59 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Scoped gun for a drone OK yeah, you clearly know what you're doing.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know anything about shooting or why a scoped gun is a bad thing…I know she won’t shoot down a single drone with that thing though.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A scope limits your field of view. It makes it easier to hit far away things moving relatively slowly/predictably.

It would be the opposite of helpful against a fast/close small target. There's a reason duck hunters use shotguns.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

Ah. Thank you. I thought it would be the limited number of shots you’d be able to take versus the oppurtunity to hit something vital in the you had.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

$100 says she barely takes that thing past 100 yards...good luck hitting a drone 400+ yards from you moving at 60mph.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

All she has in her house are succulents? That makes sense. They're literally the only things someone like her could possibly hope to keep alive. They need almost zero attention, maintenance, or moisture.

Just like her brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm not a gun person, but it seems to me like anyone who claims they can shoot down a drone with a rifle is also revealing themselves to not be a gun person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

COINCIDENCE? I think...so.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 hours ago

refuses to elaborate

load more comments
view more: next ›