this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
293 points (98.7% liked)

News

23627 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 137 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

These are huge upgrades over the old trucks. The proportions are sized to fit the features they need, like fast, ergonomic access to the back, and better visibility than any other car on the road.

Good on them for designing a good vehicle instead of letting some sports car fanatic dictate a concept car idea.

Taking courage in your design will win over the car fanatics in 5 or so years when the next design trend starts, and the reliability and function will mean that these will keep looking good 30 years from now.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

It also catches fire noticeably less than the old trucks

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 82 points 3 weeks ago

That's because they spend the majority of their time inside of it and work vehicles are supposed to be function over form.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They look a bit futuristic in a weird way, to me. I think they could end up looking iconic.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that little vehicle from Flight of the Navigator that delivers the food, then he hides in it to escape the facility.

Food delivery bot from Flight of the Navigator

[–] Kingofclubs615@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh, I've been trying to figure out why they looked so familiar! Thanks. This has been bugging me periodically for a while.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like an asset from a pixar film with the blank background. Pictures of the real thing in the article it looks wonky but it's more about function over form.

[–] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Looks like their mail totes but upside-down.

I like the aesthetics and color scheme.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It looks like what mail trucks would look like in Back to to the Future II.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It looks goofy but practical, I kinda like it.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It looks goofy

You mean Daffy? 😏

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Bugs Bunny is a genderfluid pansexual. Prove me wrong.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's just a case of people needing to get used to it.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I still consider schoolbusses with no noses goofy looking

It's goofy because it's just goofy looking, but that doesn't make it a bad thing, I love these goofy little vans :3

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's going to be a dorky iconic image soon. Give it a few years and it'll be normalized. Branding even.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

I would 100% put a dorky USPS truck sticker on my water bottle

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Just needs a horn tha quacks and they're all set.

I like the truck. Looks like it's nice for the driver!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What’s wrong with ducks?

(Alright. Im aware ducks are rapey bastards. Most animals are, at least every animal I looked into, which isn’t that many. But we won’t be telling kids this.)

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a person who grew up with a creek full of ducks behind my house, I can say that rapey is just the beginning. I have witnessed multiple drownings by rape followed by hours of necrophilia. I have seen ducks following a vicious gang rape swimming around with bald necks from having all of their feathers ripped out.

They are violent. I have seen males group up and rape and murder fellow males and then attack and rape the corpse for the rest of the day.

When I see a protective mother duck having her babies chased around by kids, I stop them. “You have no idea what that poor girl endured to have that row of ducklings following her around. Leave her alone!”

I shudder at the thought of a more violent animal.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Fuckin ducks broke him

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

What’s wrong with ducks?

Look, you're old enough to know this by now: you're really a beautiful swan.

[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 23 points 3 weeks ago

They're goofy but in a cute cartoony way. I love them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

The ACs came none to soon. Summers are not going to get any cooler. I always feel bad for the carriers on summer days as it is.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

they look so goofy that I burst out laughing any time I see it, they're just so cute! It's like the opposite reasoning of laughing at a cybertruck but the same outcome

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Though I bet carriers are like Shhhh this has AC.. Who TF cares what it looks like?

[–] lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder what they'll do with the old ones? Government auction site maybe?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Nope. LLV's are exclusively scrapped by the USPS at end of life. I tend to think thats mostly to retain their image as a USPS only vehicle and prevent potential impersonation for crime, which is the same reason UPS has a "always scrap" policy as well.

There are a very few select examples that have been sold private party by not-the-usps, and do exist out there but there will be no great flood of EOL mail trucks. Most of them are so incredibly beat at this point that they barely work anyway.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Wow, I never considered how I don’t see mail trucks posing as other things. Thats a fun fact.

It’s like never seeing old Pizza Hut buildings turned into other things.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 11 points 3 weeks ago

Those UPS trucks are neat. They would make fun food trucks.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm so incredibly happy for these postal carriers!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Me, too. Out here we get snow, dark weather, rain for months, and they have to drive on gravel and on unpaved shoulders in RWD un-air conditioned and poorly heated tin cans.

Plus they don't make much in the way of scratch at all so this is the first change they need. When I ask the letter carriers they say that they likely won't see the new rigs for at least a year on the Left Hand Coast.

(the second thing they need is to be making lots more money because they don't make enough to deal with customers like me much less their current vehicles)

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Form follows function, who gives a shit how something looks when it's useful?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But does it quack like a duck?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Wouldn't it be wonderful if their horns made a quaking sound?

[–] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just a really faint memory but I recall during COVID there was big negativity with USPS not doing their due diligence to select the best option and some other shady USPS dealings at the time.

I wonder if they changed the proposed vehicle since then.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Originally they wanted to mainly procure ICE vehicles, because Trump. Then they changed it to mainly EVs because the reasonable people were in charge for a time. Those EVs have generally been well received by the drivers. Who knows what happens next.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Based off of memory, they didn't, and this contract was awarded to a defense contractor who built this thing that only gets 13MPG instead of the EV option we were told we'd be getting and I believe they each cost well over $100k per unit. They were forced to build more EVs as promised but these still cost $192k per truck, about as much as a Lamborghini Huracán.

[–] BigSadDad@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Such a unique and fun design is going to stand out in our collective culture. Kids are going to love this thing.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Some people that realize how much of an upgrade this is. The original carriers (Grumman LLV) used the same body-on-frame chasis as the Chevy S-10 Blazer and used a GM-sourced 2.5L I4 engine ("Iron Duke") which was infamous for catching on fire. In other words, nothing has changed in 40 years.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The front kinda reminds me of a ski boot that you shove into a binding…downhill alpine mail slalom?!?!