685
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Black Texas high school student who was suspended because his loc hairstyle violated the district’s dress code was suspended again upon his return to school Monday, an attorney for the family told CNN.

Darryl George has been suspended for more than two weeks because his loc hairstyle violates the Barbers Hill Independent School District dress and grooming code, according to his family.

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 251 points 1 year ago

The code states that "male students' hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes" CNN previously reported.

Is this school stuck in 1959?

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you want to bet that the code for "female students" is at least three times as long and contains the words "leg skin"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago
[-] ech@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ruby Bridges is still alive. MLK Jr would be ~~70~~ 94 if he weren't assassinated. This isn't something that's a relic of the ancient past. It's something we're barely starting to address in the current day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

Jesus would get suspended.

[-] roux@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago

It is Texas so yeah.

[-] FattestMattest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

What is this? The tiny town from Footloose?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 200 points 1 year ago

... Darryl was suspended the same week the state’s CROWN Act, a law prohibiting discrimination based on one’s hair texture or protective hairstyle such as locs and braids, went into effect.

This is what systemic racism looks like in real life.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

I’m surprised Texas would even pass such a law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 163 points 1 year ago

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

Why do male and female students have different dress codes? WTF does the school system care if boys have longer hair? Apart from safety issues like being in a workshop class, why does anyone in the school system think they have the right to control who can and can't have certain hair lengths?

Yo, is anyone else getting really sick of this overreach of power and authority? I'm not referring to the economic and political relations. Those aside, I'm talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance, medicine, gender, and even straight bs crap like a high school band finishing a song. This is getting way out of hand. Our culture is rotting with power and control issues at the expense of individual liberties.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance

I'm sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was "how they dressed" and "were they asking for it."

That bullshit has been a throughline in US culture for fucking decades. I'm in my forties and when I was in high school, girls had ridiculous dress codes that were clearly sexist and clearly icky as fuck. Why would male authority figures be so obsessed with young women not being "too revealing" unless they're the creepy fucks who are staring?

Not to mention all the rules about men's pants sagging in the 90's. A rule that seemed aimed at young black and latino men in particular.

Believe it or not, it's better than it was in the 90's. It's still bad, it's still bullshit, but it's not new.

[-] dmonzel@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was "how they dressed" and "were they asking for it."

It still happens.

[-] FlickOfTheBean@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

And that's why it's the job of people like you and me to raise a hellish stink about it whenever it happens so that one day, maybe it will finally stop.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 50 points 1 year ago

Why do male and female students have different dress codes?

Sexism.

And yes I'm fucking up to here with this authoritarian bullshit not to mention the bigotry.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 149 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This particular School District has pulled this stunt so many times that the State of Texas passed a damn law, called the CROWN Act, to make them stop! They're back it claiming that the CROWN Act doesn't regulate length or color.

The CROWN Act sailed through the Texas Legislature with strong bi-partisan support and Gov Abbott even held a formal signing ceremony for it. How god damned racist do you have to be that even those people think you've gone too far?

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

When the Texas legislature and Abbott both think you've gone too far right, you've catastrophically fucked up on an inhumane level.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fantomas@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Well it is considered poor form to just put 'NO BLACKS' in the prospectus.

They had to get creative.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Dress codes are like THE tool schools use to punish students that they dont like. eg. minorities, girls, anyone that doesnt conform to gender norms i.e trans kids etc. They cant get away with coming out and saying "whites only" so they selectively enforce the rules to target anyone they want.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

I got suspended once for wearing a shirt with an anatomical drawing of a human skull on it. Like annotated and shit. I got sent to the principal multiple times for wearing simple eyeliner. They would literally force us to shave our faces with shitty disposable razors in a school bathroom if we had stubble. I've been able to grow a full beard since freshman year. I was more of a distraction covered in little cuts and nicks that my fucking stubble ever was. And this was over 11 years ago. I'm sure shit has only gotten worse in the little country towns in Texas. I have zero respect for any authorities figures. The only thing this kinda bullshit teaches you is to hate those with a modicum of power and to wish for the collapse of society.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago

I said this in another thread, but this may be unconstitutional based on Bostock v. Clayton County. That was about employment though. You can’t discriminate based on sex. In the case it’s about discriminating against a gay person because “being attracted to women” is allowed for men but not women. So a hairstyle should not be allowed for women and not men. They are discriminating based on sex.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I think you're right actually. Bostock established that if changing the person's gender makes something unacceptable become acceptable, it's sexual discrimination.

As long as the Court respects precedent, which sadly is no longer a given, the school district is clearly in the wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ech@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Children & students historically don't get the benefit of precedent or rights afforded to adults, unfortunately. Hope to see a different outcome here.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago

The kicker is that Texas passed the CROWN Act this year, so discrimination based on hairstyle is actually illegal here now.

This is basically a test case for the new law: https://www.aol.com/news/texas-school-district-suspended-student-010157918.html

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Ladies and gentlemen and everyone else:

The land of the free

[-] glockenspiel@programming.dev 31 points 1 year ago

Conservatives: pErSoNal ReSpOnSiBiLiTy.

Also Conservatives: No, not like that! My feelings!!!

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Am I the only one seeing this kid’s picture and thinking he’s the least offensive teenager I’ve seen this week?

[-] krayj@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dress code standards for hair and appearance are pretty dumb... but even as they are written in this school district, I don't understand how this kid's hair violates it.

The code says the hair can't extend below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes...and this kid's hair is above his eyebrows and above his ear lobes. I'm looking at the student's front, side, and back photos that are attached to the linked news article. What is the problem?

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

The "problem" is hes black and the school wanted to punish him for that. But they dont want to just come out and say it just like they didnt want to show their faces back in the days of the klan.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

The actual dress code written in the article is:

Male students’ hair must not extend below the top of a t-shirt collar or be gathered or worn in a style that would allow the hair to extend below the top of a t-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, or below the ear lobes when let down.

It’s basically “no long hair, regardless of how it is styled.”

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Land of the free, home of the "long hair is only for girls".

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Not quite. He is not really wearing a style that would allow the hair to extend below the collar, brows, or lobes because he can't just take out his hair style. Its not a pony tail to be removed and distract all the boys like in the movies, its been documented to be in place for at least 8 days. And even if he did his hair could stick straight out or stright up. Seems like the dress code was written for white people hair and instead of using any sort of common sense to not enforce or even just change the code the school is doubling down on murky rules in the national eye. If it walks like a racist, talks like a racist, and deprives black people of an education because of their hair its probably a racist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Poor kid. 2 weeks of his schooling disrupted over complete bs. Dress code is already mostly bs, but leave it to Texas to take it the nth degree and dictate hair length. Not even in Utah do they have such draconian rules on hair length.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 37 points 1 year ago

That's probably the only time I've seen the word "loc" outside of Don't Be A Menace.

Don't really think the school has a leg to stand on here. It's a neat and tidy haircut. It's not something I'd get done, but that's mostly because I'm a mid-40's balding white man.

Suspending someone for having a black haircut is asking for trouble. Even in Texas.

[-] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I just wanna say I think this hairstyle is beautiful!

[-] yenahmik@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Agreed! It looks really good. The fact he was suspended for this is an absolute disgrace by that district.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Is it a new thing to call dreads a "loc hairstyle" or something? I've never heard anything but 'dreads' or 'dreadlocks'.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is he going to some kind of military school?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It's because he's black and the faculty are fucking with him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 1 year ago

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

I'm confused how does this not conform to those guidelines?

[-] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 1 year ago

“Male students’ hair must not extend below the top of a t-shirt collar or be gathered or worn in a style that would allow the hair to extend below the top of a t-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, or below the ear lobes when let down.”

Ah, I see now... still they can suck 87 dicks with a dress code like that. "You can't look how you want when not here either?". Fuck that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,”

Does this mean you can't have hair on the back of your head too? /s

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The only haircut allowed in Texas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kahlenar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Schools having no fucking clue what to do and suspending kids aside, that they made him sit on a stool for 8 hours is some barbaric shit. Like when teachers wake kids up if they're taking a nap in study hall.

Education, knowledge, and learning are great. Fuck teachers, schools, and administrators. Also fuck these racist pieces of shit especially

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

training them for the racist workforce

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
685 points (97.6% liked)

News

23305 readers
3632 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS