Yes, it’s an actual foreign policy article that says “Unites States”
Yes, I’m dunking on that and not their actual argument because I’m a lib
Source: World Bank life expectancy data (indicator SP.DYN.LE00.IN)
Obviously, the "Russian Federation" here was the USSR before 1991
Yeah, the October Revolution ended pretty well.
“Terrorist” in the 21st century is the equivalent of “communist” in the 20th century for libs, change my mind
Pretty irrelevant instance, they have virtually no posts if you change the filter to instance-only.
Maybe it’s 📽
Taiwan. Hong Kong.
Hawaii. Puerto Rico.
Massacre
That's not an accurate interpretation of the event at all. Please do some research. I'll give you a link to one of our threads on this to get you started: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/1240721
I think you're confusing which country you're talking about, let me fix this for you:
Imagine if Zelenskyy government used their power to create a thriving Ukrainian civil society, fight corruption, or benefit people to show the path to a successful Ukrainian state
Instead we get kidnappings and throats getting slit on film
Zelenskyy achieves nothing but revenge fantasies
In before Confederates whip out “heritage not hate”
man who lives in this rental property convinced him to to sign over the deed to the rental house
Based, landlords like the Reddit thread’s OP deserve :gulag:
Let’s pay our respects to the victims of September 11th, 1973, when the US probably helped a coup in Chile
If you’re doing a devil’s advocate of something you don’t support, you should critique it.
Otherwise it has “I’m not racist but insert racism” vibes
Careful, I’m expecting the Western leftist “yes but I don’t support any socialist attempt that ever actually worked”
to The Economist
Challenge: The Economist proving Lenin wrong (difficulty: impossible)
Would you mind explaining? I heard China uses “democratic centralism” which seems to give people far more of a say.