348

Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] socsa@piefed.social 35 points 1 day ago

The porn ban will just be the excuse they use to crack down on VPNs so they can implement a full on Chinese style internet censorship program.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Goof luck for the companies depending on VPNs...but hey, Donnie's going to crash the economy anyway, so why fret.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Tank it purposefully and then say he's the only one who can fix it.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

The Americans can choose between Vlad's Russia, CCP China, 1979 Iran and All of the Above. WTF, the fucking Nazis did not ban porn.

[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 182 points 1 day ago

First president to make pictures of his current wife illegal

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago

First president to have actual nude photos of his wife available.

If any other president, especially a Democrat, had nudes of their wife it would be a scandal.

But America is so beholden to these idiots that it doesn't even matter to anyone.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

There are lots of things they do that're scandalous. That's not one of them. There's already enough puritanical bullshit fucking up the US. It's about time some of it were left in the past.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Remember when the right had a meltdown over Michelle Obama’s bare arms.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

isn’t that her second amendment right though?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago

Calling out hypocrisy isn't puritanical.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Joker@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People who voted for Trump after he won:

The same people after he declare porn illegal.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

I hope they actually do it. This is like the abortion issue, if they actually go through with it people will be like "What?? How could this happen??"

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

And then 2 years pass, and they have completely who banned porn, and why it’s the mistake of Democrats.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Considering the countrybas a whole didn't learn from 2016, there is absolutely no way anything would change.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 22 hours ago

Oh man do I ever hope they ban porn in the US. That would be fucking hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 131 points 1 day ago

registered sex offender status for educators distributing it

If a book in your classroom or school library has anything beyond a heterosexual peck on the cheek, congratulations, you're now a sex offender. Not a joke.

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 day ago

Oh boy, I can't wait for abstinance to be taught as the only form of sexual education in America.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

I'm expecting them to go even further, and just stop doing sex education period.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

So? The president is a felon. Crime is legal.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 day ago

Historically speaking people have two things they riot for, safety and comfort. How that comfort manifest varies but pornography is definitely on the same level as whiskey, and the United states has had a rebellion on that.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 24 points 1 day ago

THE GOONER REBELLION, WOOOOO!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

YOU CAN HAVE MY PORNHUB ACCOUNT WHEN YOU PRY IT FROM MY COLD, DEAD PENIS!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

And somehow we just elected a guy who has no qualms with turning the military and the police on its own citizens despite legal doctrine.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

Well luckily the military has a good chance of not listening to him, atleast in my opinion. The police on the other hand are more of a threat, though not an insurmountable one.

The liberal officers are going to resign in protest then pat themselves on the back and call it integrity.

Then the fascists are going to follow orders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Good thing we spent the last 25 years giving the police surplus military equipment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean invest in VPN stocks then?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] spector@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

They're doing their own version of Iranian revolution aren't they.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Download all the porn right now before it gets banned

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

I have been downloading porn since 2001. Fear not!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

We're back to 1920s. Mafia will bootleg porn from Mexico and Canada.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

Hilarious. As if this could ever actually be instituted nationwide. Regulations on sale and access maybe, but moral crusades like this are perpetually doomed to failure, much like the War on Drugs.

Doesn't mean they won't try, won't posture, won't grandstand about it, but to actually succeed in this goal when over 50% of the populace isn't going to be behind it? I guess we'll just have to watch them try.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago

It's not to try and ban porn

It's a way to snoop on all Internet traffic.

Like cops "smelling weed" anytime they want to hassle someone. If they don't like a person, they'll spy on their Internet usage, obviously find some kind of porn, and then make a public spectacle out of to distract from what they're mad at that person for.

They don't care about the crime, they want an excuse to investigate people they don't like.

Say something mean on twitter, and they'll search your IP till they find something they can call porn.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They'll say they're gonna ban it and when there's uproar they'll say to "protect the kids" you need a digital ID to access porn. Then they'll expand it to everything, ban VPN's, encryption and there will be no more privacy. Big brother is watching, and if he deems you too woke, for whatever arbitrary reason, you're off to the gulag.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The war on drugs only failed if you truly believe its goal was getting rid of drugs.

To quote John Erlichman, one of its architects:

“The Nixon Campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar Left, and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black. But by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

By the strandards of what it was created to do, the war on drugs was fantastically successful.

The war on porn will be successful in exactly the same way, because Republicans have already spent decades redefining all LGBTQ content as "pornographic". This is will be a tool for disrupting queer and trans communities, for erasing queer and trans resources and tearing down queer and trans rights activists. Stopping porn isn't the point, and it never was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago

Least important effect of a Trump presidency - but I'm sure if he did this it'd be the straw that broke the camel's back for Gen Z Trumpers.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Violence against women is about to skyrocket when the incels can't get a date because they're too repulsive and can't watch porn to take out their sexual frustrations because of what they voted for.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Those kids would be very angry if they could read

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

The one thing this election has all but confirmed for me is that over half of the country supports these things unabashedly, and I highly doubt porn will be the hero that magically changes these people. It's already banned in multiple conservative states, and all of them just voted red again.

Honestly, I believe that if the Trump admin brought back prohibition, his bootlickers would be the first in line telling us how it's the best idea ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Good luck! Literally all his fan base are probably rabid porn junkies.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Ironically, they're also significantly more likely to watch transgender porn. People are weird and stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
348 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19090 readers
1895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS