The first time around, in 2016, there were a lot of "Trump will be great for the economy" takes. There were many unknowns at the time, so I can forgive people who believed that then. By the time 2024 came around, anyone with a pulse - or anyone who hadn't attached their entire ego to him - knew better.
Genuinely appreciate the insight. Thanks for the fair response.
The person everyone forces you to be vs the person you are for yourself.
"Should we ban self-expression, or just limit it away from women?"
Okay buddy.
I think I perceive that event as Trump appeasement more than authoritarian bullshit, but I at least get where you're coming from, and I agree that it was a bullshit move. I liked Carney for being someone who I had believed would stand up to Trump, as opposed to our other option, who is still likely still trying to brush the flavour of boot leather out of his mouth. Doing shit to placate the orange turd is just going to empower him. We already saw this once with Hitler and the strategy of appeasement; we don't need to see it again.
Okay, 100% with you on his love for fossil fuels and military spending, but what specifically has he done to be deserving of calling him out of "authoritarian bullshit"?
Honestly? Starting to look like it. From one partnership with an authoritarian Imperialist empire to another, I guess.
Pretty confident "Look Outside" is an RPG maker game. I cannot recommend it enough. It is an immaculately written game, and oozes passion and personality.
Now these are some shitposts.
The problem is they realized they don't have to be. Why put time and energy into building subtle and nuanced propaganda when overwhelming brute force of massive lies works just as well, if not better?
Certain groups will take this and run with it, and in a year it'll be hard to remember who started the lie.
Apparently "nationalism is bad" is an uncivil take. Unless there's another reason someone would ban this comment... 🤔
I'm not eager to jump from one authoritarian Imperialist nation to another.