418
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary:

Amid rising early voting numbers from women in battleground states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania—where they make up 55% of ballots cast—some conservative voices are panicking. Right-wing commentators are sounding the alarm, fearing that even MAGA-supporting husbands’ wives might be casting secret ballots for Kamala Harris.

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, has put it starkly: “If men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.” Jesse Watters of Fox News has even equated a wife secretly voting for Harris to “having an affair.”

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago

My wife just read to me a tweet (or whatever) where a husband was making his wife vote by mail so he could guarantee she voted for Trump.

I feel like he should be charged for voting twice. If she doesn't get to pick who to vote for, she's not voting, he is. Send him to jail for 15 years (or for whatever they sent that woman who cast the provisional ballot because she was told she could and then she wasn't eligible to vote in the end).

The irony of these guys complaining about vote manipulation conspiracies while manipulating votes.

I have to wonder how good political polls are at detecting this type of thing, also motivation to actually go vote on the day.

What I mean is, before and after the floating garbage joke, responses to polls might have been the same, but some responders might have become much more motivated to actually vote.

Most commentators and pollsters are saying the polling is very thorough and accurate but resolving these types of issues doesn't really seem possible to me.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

Next they'll be wanting jobs, to own property and to wear trousers too!

Yeah, and we can't give them that because trousers are a zero-sum game and if women wear trousers, then there won't be enough trousers to go around!

/s

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 9 hours ago

Lol. This is awesome. What a bunch of douchebag losers.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

"Voting for Harris is like having an affair"? That extrapolates into some pretty creepy implications about how they see their and their wife's relationship with Trump.

[-] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 13 hours ago

Treat women like objects and strip their rights.... fuck around and find out.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 139 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Jesse Watters of Fox News has even equated a wife secretly voting for Harris to “having an affair.”

something that this article didn't mention is that jesse walters' current marriage started as an affair: he started dating his current wife while he was married to his previous wife. (source)

yet another example of every accusation being a confession.

[-] Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

Missing little nugget on this. His current wife, ex mistress, was a producer in his show. Copy/pasted from Wikipedia: "Noelle filed for divorce in 2018 after Watters admitted to an affair with a producer on his show, Emma DiGiovine. Watters claimed to have begun dating DiGiovine by letting the air out of her vehicle's tires so she would ask him for a ride."

Funking all caps CREEP.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

it's (somehow) even creepier when you hear how he describes it:

"When I was trying to get [my wife Emma] to date me, first thing I did, uh, I let the air out of her tires," Watters claimed, pleased with himself. "She couldn't go anywhere, she needed a lift. I said, 'Hey, you need a lift?' She hopped right in the car." (source)

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago

he started dating his current wife while he was married to his previous wife

Traditional Republican values today.

[-] moseschrute@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

You could say he’s a tradhusband.

[-] Marthirial@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Accufessions should be a term.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 40 points 15 hours ago

Smash the patriarchy.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 52 points 16 hours ago

So those MAGA women actually have two jobs: Vote early for Harris, and keep their husbands occupied on voting day...

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Sneak in a good laxative!!! 😁

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 17 hours ago

Oh, many of them are. They are right to be afraid. Everything makes these gamma males afraid, though. Climate change, the empowerment of women, people who disagree with them.

They are gentler than snowflakes, they are cold breezes in a world that's steadily warming. And they know it. They fear the future, no matter what happens. They fear change.

[-] pigup@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

It's as if they want to conserve the status quo. We should call them "conservationists"!

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 100 points 20 hours ago

How dare they have opinions of their own.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 18 hours ago

Their book says...

[-] CaptMorgan@freeradical.zone 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

@MicroWave News flash MAGAtards, your wives are not your property

[-] Gorfram@beige.party 68 points 20 hours ago

@MicroWave Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA: “If men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.”

🥳 YASS, king!!! 🥳 🥳 🥳

...Wait, what? That's not how he meant it?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 79 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I wonder if divorce rates will go up.

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago

No, most likely just spousal abuse. The right is well known for not having to need proof to believe something as fact. All they need is a passing thought that it could be possible, or worse the orange tells them "your wives are traitors that voted for Kam-ela"

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 50 points 20 hours ago

As long as No Fault Divorce is still legal in their areas.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Exactly. Depends on who wins the election!

[-] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 22 points 18 hours ago

Will a republican judge see a fault in a married woman voting against her ~~owners~~ husbands wishes?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago

If they didn't let people take their phone with them while they fill the slip I guarantee there would be even more.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

They don't let you use your phone.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You're hidden while filling the ballot aren't you? Not hard to take it out and take a picture because your crazy spouse wants to make sure you vote "for the right person"

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 4 hours ago

It is a crime in Texas to take photograph s within 100ft of a voting machine

It was annoying too, because Texas has huge ballots, and I took notes on my phone to help me.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No. Mine looks like this but more spaced out. They have signs up about phones and the room is very well monitored. I tried to use my phone last time because i had screenshotted my vote411. They gave me a pen and a paper to go outside and write them down instead.

Edit-forgot the pic.

[-] DBT@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

That’s weird. I saw no such signs and had my phone out when I voted. It was in my hand plain as day when I walked from the ballot table to the booth.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Guess it varies from places to places... Which is always weird from a Canadian point of view considering federal elections are handled by the federal government so the norms are the same cross country.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Ah. Yep. Phones are okay in Illinois. Phones are not okay in Texas. Those are the only two I checked.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 18 points 21 hours ago

worst thing about the Julia Roberts ad (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCPck2qDhk, if you must) is they someone not completely filling in the scantron bubble on the ballot

also Charlie "master debater" Kirk and Jesse "yelling on TV is my memorable trait" Watters are desperate tools, SO ANXIOUS to control women

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
418 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS