this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
773 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

19892 readers
1149 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 164 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's the line of best fit, not the line of good fit

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

Line of “least bad” fit

[–] merari42@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Best Linear Unbiased Estimator

[–] frezik@midwest.social 132 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] Corr@lemm.ee 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That was a joy. Thank you for sharing

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Check this shit out (fig 1).

Lmao there's so much gold. I got frustrated for him while reading it.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

That line, and then just by instinct going to Fig 1, and seeing its caption...incredible lol

[–] credo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I had a hard time reading. Could not stop laughing enough to get past the fourth paragraph. Sides hurt, would not recommend.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

Germanium My Ass

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Going into physics was the biggest mistake of my life. I should've declared CS. I still wouldn't have any women, but at least I'd be rolling in cash.

Honestly, there wasn't all that much cash to roll in and there's less all the time now. Plus, if you think busted equipment is bad, wait until I tell you about inheriting legacy code.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 2 years ago

From what I heard, the guy actually did change to a CS major shortly after writing this.

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

This relation between temperature and resistivity can be shown to be exponential in certain temperature regimes by waving your hands and chanting "to first order."

for some reason this is the line that got me

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One Line to rule them all
One Line to find them
One Line to bring them all
and in the data bind them

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago

One line best-fits all

[–] merari42@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Machine Learning enthusiasts: Why settle for linear regression when you can deploy a Gradient-Boosted Random Deep Neural Net Surface Vector Cluster that consumes the entire power of Iceland to trace a perfect ∞-dimensional hypersphere around those blue points? Overparameterization is the future!

[–] reinei@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Fine! I'll use a second order polynomial to fit this instead. But that's the last order I'm willing to go to!

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Oh, it's trending up. That's progress!

[–] prex@aussie.zone 15 points 2 years ago
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, some students of mines actually put some figure like that in al lab report...

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You asked for a line, they gave you a line, what more can be asked for?

We used to intentionally add wrong data to our datasets so we could circle it afterwards, declare it "outlying data" and gain the extra points for spotting and documenting it.

I'm not bitter about my formal education, honest...

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

We used to intentionally add wrong data to our datasets so we could circle it afterwards, declare it "outlying data" and gain the extra points for spotting and documenting it.

Nice trick!

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Dat spread tho

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you're having proportion of explained variance problems I feel bad for you son,
I got ninety nine problems but a fit ain't one.

(⌐■_■)

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Gaussian: "Squint."

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I don't know why you get credit at all; I do all the work. - Excel

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Looks like a successfully trained learning model, to me. (Sarcasm)

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

They'll also try to linear fit even the most obvious exponential curve.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

And if that doesn't work, there's always factor analysis.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

How can you argue with a word like "best' anyway ;)

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Probably minimal surface ellipse.