242
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

In my state I can both own a flame thrower and kangaroos. I have no plans at this time.

[-] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

Now I know why my state apparently swears the most. I want to buy a fucking flamethrower.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

From my understanding, the reason most states allow them is largely because they're very useful tools in certain fields of construction, particularly for melting tar.

If I'm mistaken, or if they also have other legitimate uses, feel free to correct me or add additional information..

[-] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I suppose the key is where the line is drawn between a flamethrower and a very large torch.

[-] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A flamethrower is a ranged incendiary device.

What do you consider a flamethrower?

How far is ranged?

Construction uses what I would call torches, not flamethrowers

There is very few cases where you want to "throw" flames. It's inefficient. Keeping the flame and the material close is preferred.

Giant pile of tar you want to set on fire as fast as possible? I guess a flamethrower is effective. Burning brush, anything where you're catching something on fire so it spreads.

They use "flamethrowers" on bitumen roofs. But the idea behind the tool is to not throw the flames as far as possible.

I'd define flamethrower as "An incendiary device that disperses uncontrollable flames at a distance"

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

For me the required characteristics would be that it dispenses a burning liquid at a distance in a controlled, directed manner.

  • If it dispenses burning gas it's not very useful as a weapon and is really just a big gas burner. Roofing torches, blowtorches, and weed burners fall into this category.
  • If it doesn't cover a meaningful distance it's also not very useful as a weapon and is essentially just a leaky container. Driptorches fall into this category.
  • If it dispenses the burning material in an uncontrolled or undirected manner it's either an incendiary bomb/grenade of some sort or an accident. It might be a weapon but not one I'd call a flamethrower.
[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Flamethrowers don't use gas. It uses liquid or solid. That's why real flamethrowers can be used at ranges of 50+ ft. Often times even higher than that.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Flamethrowers typically set fire to a stream of flammable liquid, like gasoline (as a trivial example). Torches use gas, or gas mixtures.

The inherent range differences are a meter (maybe 2) for torches, and flamethrowers do 50-100 m (source: Wikipedia). Just in case that isn't clear, those aren't the same category of device.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Traditional flamethrowers have fuel gelling additives that cause the burning fuel to stick to the victim, making them considerably more dangerous than a long flamed torch.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They are also very useful for controlled burns.

The most important thing is that nobody is using them maliciously so there is no incentive to ban them.

[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

and the reason that there are no bad guys with flamethrowers is that they're terrified of good guys with flamethrowers

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Mutually assured flames.

I believe they are also used in agriculture.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

What’s up with Delaware?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Their motto is "Come to Delaware. We hate fun!"

[-] villainy@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Please. With a motto that long you wouldn't be able to fully read the welcome sign before exiting the other side of the state.

That's why the motto is just "TAX FREE SHOPPING"

[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

That's Maryland. Delaware is white, whatever that means.

[-] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 13 hours ago

I think that's what they were asking.

[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I think you're right.

[-] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Still mad I didn’t buy one of the Tesla ones.

[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Just get a roofing / weed torch and slap a 3d printed stock on it.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

A weed or roofing torch puts out about 500,000 BTUs. You need to think a little bigger.

These put out about 60 times as much, around 30 million BTUs, and a 30' flame. The pilot light on a hot air balloon burner is a 12-18" flame.

The burner cans weigh about 20 pounds, so a bit large to shoulder, but pretty easy to sling.

They burn liquid propane, not vapor, so you'll probably want a forklift tank rather than the usual 20# barbecue bottle.

[-] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

The colour codes could be more accessible.

What do you mean? they're clearly legal everywhere except Delaware, where you have to get a permit

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

See I can't see colour, but fun fact, flame based weed abatement systems can be easily purchased in many parts of California, and they are basically just a flame thrower attachment for propane tanks.

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Torch, not flame thrower.

Vaporous propellant ignition is a torch, usually butane not propane as propane leaves residue on the glass, and burns differently.

Flame throwers are literally a pee stream of fuel that is ignited on the handle by the operator. There is only destructive use with flamethrower as well due to the lack of accurate control.

[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

More of a torch than a flame thrower though

[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Agreed. I have one and it shoots maybe a foot when you pull the trigger

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

It is is a hadheld nozzle that ejects propane that is on fire ~3ft for the purpose of burning weeds, I think that is enough to count as a "flame" "thrower"

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 21 hours ago

As someone who uses a propane burner for blacksmithing, I am constantly reminding my wife "IT'S NOT A FLAMETHROWER!" because once not long after we met, my old decrepit one sprung a leak out the side and from her viewing angle she thought it had set me on fire.

In fairness, mine is designed for a 1ft flame, but I did use a weed burner in my very first forge. About 2ft if I blasted propane without a regulator.

I'm not ready to die on the hill, but I will gladly throw up some polite resistance upon it.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Flame throwers throw something similar to napalm. Weed systems just shoot flame.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Yeah a real flamethrower fires a line of sticky flaming liquid up to 50". It's like saying a BB gun is the same thing as a M4.

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

The first flamethrowers date to the 7th century. No they aren't modern military flamethrowers but as with the description "commercial flamethrowers are generally blowtorches using gaseous fuels such as propane". No they don't have the same range or lethality but saying they cant both be flamethrowers is saying a BB doesn't shoot projectiles because it's not as the same projectiles and range of a military assault rifle.

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Not all flamethrowers throw napalm, as seen flamethrowers predate napalm. A flamethrower made to abate weeds is not nearly as powerful as a military grade one, but it still throws flame. So even if you can't buy a fancy flamethrower that shoots out 20+ feet, you can have some fun with a little propane tank based weed abatement "flamethrower". I wasn't trying to kick up an argument on the technicalities of what is a flamethrower, but your arguments are the weakest thing to support your idea.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Is the California law because of Elon Musk?

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

And his non-flamethrower? Probably not.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Remember the time Elon made a flame thrower and even that was a piece of shit too?

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yup. Strangely, that's why I got perma-banned from Reddit, just for commenting that the thing exists, and posting a link for reference.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Lol nice. I got banned once I found out about Lemmy. After that I simply went to a thread which had a particularly shitty power mod and literally just said, "sounds like something a cringe reddit person would say".

Boom. Permanent admin ban.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes. The Flamethrower. It's origin story is legendary. 🤪

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

“I’d sure like to set those people on fire, but they way TF over there”

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
242 points (97.3% liked)

Just Post

567 readers
389 users here now

Just post something 💛

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS