320
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 110 points 2 months ago

Yes I'm sure this will reduce violence

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I mean I'm all for stricter gun regulations, but chopping everybody's fingers off might be a bit much. Granted.

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

How else will they learn though?

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 11 points 2 months ago

/me makes throat slitting gesture

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 8 points 2 months ago

Oi you got a licosonse for that gesture.

[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 85 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've gotta wonder if the charge is being pushed by someone who opposes the law being talked about in the video, who wants its first application to be in a case so ridiculous it'll create mass public opposition to it or something. That's the only scenario I can think of where an otherwise functioning adult may make a decision that poor.

[-] potentiallynotfelix 80 points 2 months ago

Now I'm no judge, but I see this as a first amendment violation. The student was expressing his disdain towards the kids in a jackass sort of way, but being a jackass isn't and shouldn't be against the law.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I would be inclined to agree. Schools themselves have wide latitude to police this type of thing, much wider than general criminal law could do. So I have no problem with the kid being suspended. The criminal charge on the other hand is another matter entirely. That seems like a clear 1st Amendment violation.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Depends on context. In this case it's obvious it's not a "true threat." https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt1-7-5-6/ALDE_00013807/

[-] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 57 points 2 months ago

In Tennessee, it's a felony for impersonating a gun. Having a real one on the other hand is perfectly acceptable.

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"It's me, a 8mm Glock. I like to lie threatenly on tables and being pointed at minorities." What do you think, pretty convincing, right?

[-] MuAraeOracle@real.lemmy.fan 56 points 2 months ago

Finger guns are not covered under the 2nd amendment.

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Well you see your honor: the hand is connected to the arm.... And we have the right to bear arms so...

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 10 points 2 months ago

Ah, the RFK Jr defense. Nice.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

I prefer to have the right to Bear Arms, tbh.

[-] fossphi@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Then ask your bear to make a finger gun

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The arms are a right, the hands at the end of them are a privilege...

[-] ianonavy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It’s the right to bear arms, not the right to bare arms!

Yes it does, finger guns 100% existed in the 18th century

[-] fractal_flowers@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But they should be covered under the 1st amendment. The problem is that children don't have many rights in the US.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 months ago

Googling this... At the moment, the only source online is a single local newspaper, which omits numerous key details. Might turn out to be nothing.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Student with actual gun given a thumbs-up and a gentle kiss on the forehead.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 36 points 2 months ago
[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago
[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 20 points 2 months ago

We have the best High Schools, because of jail.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Anything but addressing the core issue.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

you can't buy fingers from weapons manufacturers so we can't protect your right to bear fingers

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago

Are finger guns going to become the equivalent of a middle finger in the US because of how many people die to guns?

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Much like the middle finger gesture is offensive because outside the US many people die to birds.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Only if the French start doing it.

[-] fractal_flowers@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

No. It's hysterical admins using lousy logic to conclude that finger guns = violence. The logic is something along the lines of finger guns = real guns = killing people.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

I think the logic is "it could be a threat" but yeah it's dumb either way, unless it is a threat I guess.

[-] fractal_flowers@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

The only time I really heard this talked about was in elementary school, and finger guns were never a threat at the school I went to. Not even once, but the teachers and administration would harp on about it like kids were demonic for making them.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They could get you expelled at mine, but not charged. IIRC even water guns would get you actually charged. Tbf it was shortly after 9/11, but still.

[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I can tell you that I was forbidden from doing that while playing during a vacation in Colorado, mere months before Columbine. This bullshit is ridiculous.

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Clearly you weren't in a dangerous finger-standoff by yourselves.

[-] potentiallynotfelix 8 points 2 months ago

Says an error occurred and I can't get the link, can you send it here?

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

More repuglican insanity

[-] jafo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

TBF, that's how I robbed Chase Bank last week.

[-] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I know I'm late to the party, but...

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

Ah yes, YouTube.com as a reliable journalistic source...

[-] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Huh? You know news organizations have YouTube channels right?

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
320 points (95.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12341 readers
750 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS