320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MuAraeOracle@real.lemmy.fan 56 points 1 month ago

Finger guns are not covered under the 2nd amendment.

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Well you see your honor: the hand is connected to the arm.... And we have the right to bear arms so...

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 10 points 1 month ago

Ah, the RFK Jr defense. Nice.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I prefer to have the right to Bear Arms, tbh.

[-] fossphi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Then ask your bear to make a finger gun

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The arms are a right, the hands at the end of them are a privilege...

[-] ianonavy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It’s the right to bear arms, not the right to bare arms!

Yes it does, finger guns 100% existed in the 18th century

[-] fractal_flowers@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But they should be covered under the 1st amendment. The problem is that children don't have many rights in the US.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
320 points (95.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12193 readers
607 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS