this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
517 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11893 readers
2311 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 80 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This guy has half a dozen people locked up for "content". Is anyone else seeing how this is hugely problematic?

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, in fact there's a whole genre of video essay where people explain how Mr Beast is problematic.

But to be fair, he's just an extension of the last 30 years of reality tv. Lure some desperate people with a large sum of cash, make them suffer in front of the camera, edit liberally, air for the entertainment of millions.

Additionally, one of the most popular tv shows of the decade is a criticism of exactly this phenomenon. Mr Beast did a whole tv series that tried to be Squid Game unironically, completely missing the moral of the story and spawning another round of criticism. Something something Guy Debord, something Jean Baudrillard something.

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, a hyper-reality reference out in the wild.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I never know which is which. I've read both The Society of the Spectacle and Simulacra and Simulation but I don't think I understood any of it, so a vague allusion is the best I can do. I understood a lot more of the 2016 documentary HyperNormalization, which is a synthesis of both? (I understood neither, so I'm just guessing there.)

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

If the people are doing it voluntarily, and the minor(s) have parental consent, I don't see the issue. I doubt they have no way to leave early.

Now, it may be problematic from a societal standpoint, that people want to do such a thing because they don't make enough money.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago

That's precisely the point of the proplem: he exploits misery and dreams of wealth in a society that by design creates misery and glorifies money.

Imagine someone neeeding the money to save an ill relative. Would you still call it"voluntarily"?

And all those kids who dream of getting rich by suffering on video, what kind of value is that promoting?

[–] kamee@lemmy.zip 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like there are various pieces of cinema pointing out why this is very fucking problematic

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 9 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hunger games. I remember a Youtuber predicting Mr Beast will end up organizing some Hunger games!

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did they place a bet on that? /s

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Not that I know. Maybe he should?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

All those Saw movies and similar?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

I call this the "no literal gun pointed at head" fallacy.

[–] sploder@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Some dude who agreed to one of these extended challenges released a video exposing the behind the scenes abuse they do to get you to stay as long as possible so they get more content from you. Their whole investment of time and hype isn’t worth it if you leave after a few days like you’re tempted to. It was pretty disturbing, I believe it’s still on YouTube.

The only set ups that aren’t as abusive imo are the ones that can only last so long and are in public. I believe one was whoever keeps their hand on the car the longest wins the car. That one is pretty harmless with a decent pay off.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Sounds like you haven't watched Black Mirror. Most episodes are worth a watch, but for this conversation, I recommend starting with Series 7 Episode 1.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

It would be pointless if they had no way to leave early. The entire premise is that they have to voluntarily endure the situation for the reward.