matlag

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

He will declare that Dems cheated everywhere they win, and if the House tries anything, he will declare they are traitors and declare state of emergency claiming absolute power (or whatever other made up shit).

Time to count who sides with whom in the military…

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

No no no, when you ask them, they work 200 hours a week. Each of them. At the very least!

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

The poor aren’t poor because the wealthy are wealthy. Like I said, the vast majority of the wealthiest people’s wealth is not cash money, it’s a theoretical price tag going up over time. Over the past hundred years, the number of billionaires per capita has increased 7x, but a hundred years ago, poverty was MUCH more prevalent than it is today.

The poor are poor because while they're paid peanuts, everybody else estimates the value they create through their work in very large numbers. It is absolutely a matter of work-value distribution. Calling that "wealth redistribution" is an artifact to prop the "tax is steal" propaganda.

Tax the companies "theoretical price tag" and see it adjusting to much more realistic numbers, that would be beneficial for everyone.

Lastly, we can keep saying all we want about one hundred years ago, but at the time, economic growth was 2 digits. Today it's one digit, and almost all of it value goes straight up to the ultra-rich. Growth is decreasing but ultra-rich worth net keeps increasing at faster rate. How can one not see this is bonkers?

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I am pretty sure than between the current model that is slowly but inexorably going towards: "2 kinds of people in the world: trillionaires and people depending on trillionaire's charity to survive", and the model decribed above, we can find a middle ground.

Not so long ago, the ratio between CEOs pay and median worker pay was 20. Today it's 280. There were successful and motivated CEO at the time.

The US had a period during which the highest tax bracket was 90%. There were CEO, there were rich folks and there were entrepreneurs.

Enough with all the "impossible". The current situation is the anomaly. The current situation is the not sustainable approach. It's not just the US, neo-liberalism has spread over the decades with the very very very exact same results absolutely everywhere it was tried:

-impoverished population overall -reduction of services to the population -increased public deficit -ultra-rich getting immensely richer

Either we keep saying "it's complicated" and keep course. Its end is already known: a collapse of the economy on itself: there is not enough people left making a decent enough living to buy what is produced, and everything belong to the ultra-rich.
Or we change course. It's almost a matter of survival for the poor.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sure I can answer him: because there was no better way to push your white supremacist nazi propaganda and launching a child porn abure tool as a stand-alone app would have landed you in jail.

You're welcome!

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is actively trying to kill Canada's car industry. So if China is willing to do so, Canada should lift the tariffs on their EVs in exchange for a quota of cars or components made in Canada.
Long term, it is probably a better strategy as US car makers are falling so much behind on EVs they could go down in the coming years, especially if they hang on petro-cars.

As for the military, it's never too late to start doing the right thing and diversify its sourcing. No more 100% US by default, and require guarantees on supply and independence.
Europe and other countries have very good and modern equipments also, mind you.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I agree with you on what we'll hear, but I second the other comment: besides the speeches, Carney will move Canada further away from the US.
He started doing so without saying it too loudly. Only an idiot would not see it. The good thing is only one idiot needs to be fooled.

To escalate, he has multiple levers at his disposal: the everlasting hesitation between F35 and Gripen purchase, the tariffs on Chinese EV (if they were repelled, US car makers could be driven out of Canada's market within just a few years). And of course dumping US bonds, but that would hurt Canada too.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

"No worries! We just launched Chat-Phone: a cellphone totally connected to ChatGPT. It has almost no capability by itself: poor CPU, min RAM, min/no storage, etc. But it is always connected to ChatGPT!
BTW: because of RAM shortage, we are the only smartphone maker in the world now!"
The phone is 50$, but you need the premium subscription for it to work…

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Promises of buying only work if the buyer still exists at the time you produce the goods.
Besides, I'm pretty sure that the main buyers type on the consumer side are PC and phone makers. So they could go back there almost unharmed.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you forget only the name, that's cool. I also forget people's faces. Talking with kids parents: "Hi! I'm [name] -Huh! I know!" -_-'

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Since vibe coding produces code that looks like it was written by a drunk-dead dev, they might actually be on the right track!

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

And then they will use US made systems. But the vendors will locate some computers in Europe, so it's totally sovereign.

 

J'ai 3 forfaits chez Fizz, les appareils sont capables d'utiliser la LTE, mais d'après leur service de test: #8378 La raison semble être que Fizz utilise une liste blanche d'appareils certifiés!

Après le 31 juillet 2025, soit nous avons un des appareils certifiés Fizz, soit nous n'aurons plus la capacité de passer et recevoir des appels.

Liste des appareils certifiés au 05 février 2025

Liste des appareils certifiés VoLTE chez Fizz

Apple

iPhone 8 et 8 plus iPhone X iPhone XS et XS Max iPhone XR iPhone 11, 11 Pro et 11 Pro Max iPhone SE (2e et 3e génération) iPhone 12 mini, 12, 12 Pro et 12 Pro Max iPhone 13 mini, 13, 13 Pro et 13 Pro Max iPhone 14, 14 Plus, 14 Pro et 14 Pro Max iPhone 15, 15 Plus, 15 Pro et 15 Pro Max iPhone 16, 16 Plus, 16 Pro et 16 Pro Max

Google

Pixel 4a 5G Pixel 5 Pixel 6, 6 Pro et 6a Pixel 7, 7 Pro et 7a Pixel 8, 8 Pro et 8a Pixel 9, 8 Pro et 9 Pro Fold

Motorola

Moto G 5G Moto G Stylus 5G Moto G pure Motorola Razr+ 2023 Motorola Moto G 5G 2023 Motorola Moto G Play Motorola Moto G Play (2024) Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G 2023

Samsung

Galaxy A12 Galaxy A52 Galaxy A03s Galaxy A13 Galaxy A14 Galaxy A15 Galaxy A16 Galaxy A32 Galaxy A35 5G Galaxy A51 Galaxy A71 Galaxy A53 Galaxy A54 5G Galaxy S20 FE 5G Galaxy S21 FE 5G Galaxy S23 FE 5G Galaxy S24 FE 5G Galaxy S20, S20+, S20 Ultra Galaxy S21 5G, S21+ 5G et Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Galaxy S22 5G, S22+ 5G et Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Galaxy S23, S23+ et Galaxy S23 Ultra Galaxy S24, S24+ et Galaxy S24 Ultra Galaxy S25, S25+, et Galaxy S25 Ultra Galaxy Note 20 Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Galaxy Z Flip 5G Galaxy Z Fold 2 Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G Galaxy Z Fold 3 5G Galaxy Z Flip 4 5G Galaxy Z Fold 4 5G Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G Galaxy X Cover Pro 6

TCL

TCL 20S TCL 20 Pro 5G TCL Flip TCL 30 XE TCL 30 5G TCL 40 XE 5G

et si achetés chez Fizz

Liste non exhaustive des téléphones compatibles VoLTE, lorsqu'achetés chez Fizz:

Apple:

iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, iPhone XR ou un modèle ultérieur iPhone SE (2e génération et ultérieure)

Android :

Google

Pixel 3 et modèles ultérieurs

Samsung

Modèle S : S20 et modèles ultérieurs (attention, la version FE n’est PAS compatible) Modèle A: A35, A54 Modèle Note: 20 Modèle Z Flip, Z fold et ultérieurs

Motorola

Razr (modèles avec eSIM)

Les montres intelligentes ne sont pas supportées pour le moment.

Nous n'avons aucune intention de nous laisser imposer un changement d'appareils, et certainement pas en plus d'une si courte liste.

Quels opérateurs laissent encore leurs clients apporter leur téléphone sans restriction autre que les capacités de l'appareil?

 

I'm using Duolingo to improve my Mandarin and learn to read, and to learn Spanish.

Does anyone have some recommendations of texts for learners to practice reading?

My wife suggested me to use kids books, but I'd like a more motivating content than teddy bear's adventures...

 

So it's been a while now since the leaderboard's challenge is Match Madness every day except on Saturday, when it's the Ramp Up.

I don't know if it's just me but that's getting me pretty disengaged. I quickly hit my limit on the Match Madness, then it has no interest to me.

Previously, I would use these challenges on a daily basis, as a way to review past lessons. Damned, I would use them over and over to score high in the leaderboard too.

Now I've completely lost interest in the leaderboard, but worse: I'm wondering if I'm moving back by lack of practice on past lessons vocabulary and grammar.

I don't feel like going through some past lessons and pick some randomly. How do you make sure you do pick randomly?

Am I the only one who thinks that "all Match Madness" thing is a regression?

view more: next ›