this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
43 points (97.8% liked)

politics

28818 readers
2882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a college library lined with volumes on America's greatest presidents, six young men who voted for Donald Trump gathered to size up his second term. Their verdicts ranged from guarded approval to disappointment, reflecting growing tension in a demographic that helped propel Trump to victory in 2024.

While the students form a very small sample ​size, their mixed reviews - including criticism of what several called overly harsh immigration enforcement and frustration over rising prices - mirror a broader shift in national polling that shows the Republican president is losing ground with young men.

Public opinion polling suggests that this ‌softening of support, part of a broader unhappiness among Americans over Trump's policies, threatens Republicans' hopes of retaining their slim majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Analysts who track the youth vote told Reuters many young men report feeling little tangible improvement in their economic prospects since Trump returned to office in January 2025.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

Manly men following toxic masculinity stars are suddenly worried they could be drafted and sent to Iran?

I thought this was their once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to go prove themselves as manly war heroes…

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Pomfret still broadly supports Trump, grading him a ​B-plus.

So he'll keep voting (R).

A party strategist [...] said the party could still secure midterm wins if it captures at least 40% of the youth vote.

We are so fucked ...

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Why does the media feel this urgent need to profile nazi-curious white dudes?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I heard so many old fucks openly decree they are too old for combat so they don't give a shit about the "war over there."

We are truly fucked. They don't even care about other Americans why would they care about anyone else?

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Wait till they find out the fucking 'immigrant' camps are for them. You don't need massive prison camps in every state for people that you're going to deport without due process.

Engineers suddenly become expensive and hard to find? Not a problem, arrest a bunch of them for some made up bullshit, and now you can just sell/trade them as prison slaves. Same with any profession. Why pay you when they can enslave you? What are you going to do, vote against? They've got a plan to keep you from doing that too

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago

They are also building a facility to house 30,000 in Guantanamo Bay, which currently holds about 200. For context, the largest current maximum security prison in America holds 8300. They clearly intend to detain a lot of people. Why would they need such huge facilities if they are just going to deport them as fast as possible?

OP is correct. Once the immigration problem has been dealt with, those camps will require prisoners for the new American economic model. Imagine how much more profitable corporations could be if most labor costs could be replaced with AI, Automation, and Federal 13th Amendment Slave Labor.

But they're just criminals, so who cares? Unless they make things like Debt, and Unemployment, and Homelessness illegal. Need government assistance to eat? You are welcome to work it off in the camps.

After all, just handing money to poor people would be immoral. They need to work it off, so they can understand the value of a good work ethic. It's the work that will make your freedom even sweeter.

Arbeit Macht Frei. They should put those words above the front gate.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 2 points 6 hours ago

Are you kidding? They're not going to be in the camps, they're going to be the guards.