this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
624 points (99.7% liked)

News

35364 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least four leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week.

The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 99 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Resign? How does that help?

"There's a lot of injustice happening here, so let me step aside to allow for more injustice."

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 65 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I see your point but I would counter with the fact that these are probably all lawyers who know the ins and outs of our justice system better than most people and should they join the ACLU or other organizations that are going to be suing the government over all of the civil rights abuses that they've been perpetrating these people will be invaluable.

Course that's all predicated on our court system not being corrupted before we can put through a regime change in this year's midterm elections. Trump is trying hard to shove in as many friendly judges as he can right now.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

we can put through a regime change in this year’s midterm elections

It's incredible how many people still think that this will be a thing.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If Trump is actually able to stop or delay elections this year we have bigger problems.

I don't think you grasp just what it would take to actually stop elections.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd argue that you already DO have bigger problems, you just haven't come to terms with it yet.

Doesn't really matter what it would take. His plan is (and always has been) that if anything doesn't go his way, he takes it to the supreme court who he handpicked and has in his pocket. So either:

  • a) He manages to stop the midterms, or
  • b) He doesn't, but Republicans already have them rigged so as to not matter, or
  • c) They lose the midterms, Trump takes it to the supreme court, who hand the republicans the win based on "hand waved evidence of voter fraud by democrats and 'illegals'"...

Trump just gets bolder every time people say "oh we'll get out of this at the midterms." He's laughing at America.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's not that we haven't come to terms with it, it's just that any resistance will need to be legitimized by outside forces to be recognized. If you look at the long history of tyrannical governments being overthrown, American and European figureheads always talk about whether or not the local resistance groups are legitimate in their concerns or not, which ultimately determines how much outside help is given.

Look at Gaza, there's a resistance force over there that has been branded as a terrorist organization (in certain cases, deservingly) which they now also have to fight a PR campaign online.

Going full blown delegitimizes any movement, and can justify further fascist ratcheting vs them just "claiming" violence happened against them, which EVERYONE can fully see is not happening. Sure they will claim it regardless but that loses them potential allies and any high ground.

We still have a court system. We still have elections. And both of those take time.

For anyone talking about where the lines are, that's them. Functioning legitimate courts, and functioning legitimate elections.

Until then, we are out there demonstrating peacefully, building up our communities, and giving them the rope to Nuremberg themselves with.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

He doesn't have to stop them, he just needs to make brown people afraid to show up

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This administration is already overreaching, they know Trump is about to die any moment and they're trying to do way too much, too fast, and have a genuine belief that JD fucking Vance will still be able to hold the party and Trump's base together. They are making wild mistakes because they know they have a chance of getting smashed in midterms.

Yes, midterms still have a very good chance of happening. There's also a good chance they will try some bullshit to delay them or interfere, but the US is a very, VERY big place and our elections are very simple to keep secure, and they haven't had enough time and power to really sabotage the entire thing. Yet.

Also, what else can we do? Have our own private midterms and the right isn't allowed to touch it? We don't really have a choice here but expect the system will be resilient enough that we can force political change. We don't have alternatives yet.

edit: get mad, and then focus that anger somewhere productive. There is not going to be a coup, there is not going to be a general strike. Despite what the algorithm is feeding you, people are still broadly comfortable. Marches and protests are good, let's keep doing that, but by already thinking you're not going to have a vote, voice or representation in the midterms is resigning to defeat and fantasy and some secret desire to see the world burn.

Mussolini was not dragged out of the capital by a band of plucky rebels with broad support, nor forced out by a general strike, he was handed over by his own party and the growing political pressure due to Mussolini's poor management of the country. The king of Italy himself placed Mussolini under arrest and handed him over to the opposition. As much as we feel discouraged and disillusioned, we still need politics. We're not getting an anarchist utopia out of this mess. You still need to get off your ass and vote and not resent anything that drags you away from this addicting slop.

The next idiot here who says voting is useless gets blocked, I don't engage with children.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, what else can we do?

What a defeatist attitude.

Protest, strike, boycott, obstruct, organize, disrupt.

Those are all things you can do and they're all proven to be successful around the world. Stop putting all your hopes in a process they've already broken.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

What a defeatist attitude.

No, defeatist attitude is "there will be no midterms, lets instead put all our eggs in the basket that isn't doing much."

I didn't say anything about not protesting and marching, only that there will probably still be midterms, the fact that you see that "defeatist" just tells me you don't want change via politics and are fantasizing that the protests are going to turn into a coup. There will not be a coup.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's infuriating. People are literally laying down and taking it up the ass right now while saying, "it's okay, it'll be fixed a year from now"

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

"it's ok, somebody else will fix my problems for me!"

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

How is saying that we "won't have midterms" anything but lying down and taking it up the ass in advance? You've already given up and it's only January.

I wish you doomers would go back to reddit.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I say it because we need to be taking action today assuming midterms aren't happening. It isn't doomer, fuck off with that bullshit.

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Almost certainly it will be a thing but it will be more difficult than past midterms. In the meantime we got to keep fighting and doing everything we can to tank Trump's popularity (things such as talking to people who don't follow politics much) because the less popular Trump is and the less support the more likely people will refuse the risk of rigging/stopping the election.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago

Please explain to me how the federal government can cancel elections that are run by the states.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I feel like suing the government under this administration does not do anything because the current federal government rules with an iron fist. they have proven time and time and time again they do not care what laws or the constitution say.

In a sane world where law is respected, yes, I agree with everything you are saying. however, we live in an age where logic and the rule of law do not prevail. i feel their radical actions will catch up to them eventually, but at what cost? what if they do something that ends my life? I won't be able to enjoy when justice is eventually served...

currently, if someone is in a position of power and they have integrity, they should be holding onto that position for dear life while they weather this storm. the alternative leaves corruption to fill these vacant jobs with someone who has no integrity, in my opinion.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Doesn't do anything? Have you been ignoring the news?

Know what, no here.

https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

Looks like litigation is doing something.

Or if you want a more reputable source:

https://apnews.com/projects/trump-executive-order-lawsuit-tracker/

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

to clarify my statement: in my opinion, the wheels of justice are turning too slowly for a president that wakes up, waves a wand, and gets what he wants. his actions have real consequences for real Americans.

just last week, 10 billion dollars for child care was halted for states that are not republican. the effects malnourished children have every day they go hungry may last a lifetime.... and im just supposed to wait for the litigation you posted to get things sorted out? unacceptable.

I have no doubt the law is accurately tracking and will get things done, but the wait doesnt work for people that depend on social services

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, yes. I agree on that. But it's what we have. And it's exactly why they move fast and break things.

They're hoping to demoralize the American public to get further power.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I agree it is what we have as well, but there has got to be a better faster way to clean this mess up that isn't violent.

demoralization is working too, and its the only thing I have 100% control of, but I just cant give in.

im sure everyone's social circle thats reading this has at least one person they know who only works to divide minds instead of unite them, and its absolutely draining.

OK im off my soapbox for awhile, thanks for the conversation... I feel better lol

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're proving the point that the courts work: just after DHHS blocked TANF funds to five Democratic states, a judge blocked it with a TRO:

A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration from freezing roughly $10 billion in federal funding for child care and social services destined for five Democratic-led states, keeping funds flowing until a lawsuit against the government can progress. . . . The decision came less than a day after the five states targeted by the Trump administration — New York, California, Minnesota, Illinois and Colorado — filed a lawsuit arguing that the freeze could create havoc among families with young children.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/09/us/politics/trump-child-care-funding-freeze.html

Outside SCOTUS the courts are holding, and moving quickly where warranted. You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

?

I didnt choose not to post a link, do not make invalid assumptions when you know nothing about me.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not an invalid assumption, it's fact that you included only doomer, outdated news in order to support your wrong conclusion either a) without bothering to check to see if your information was correct, or b) you knew but decided not to mention it.

If you don't like false accusations then don't make them. I know that I have zero respect for that approach to posting, and between that and the lazy doomering that's enough of you for me to know. Blocked, bye.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

People here don't like reading about the power our legal system has, they want to see drama and world wrestling stageplay. They want to imagine we're going to have a glorious people's liberation movement with molotov cocktails and guillotines. Everyone is the same, everyone rather escape into kayfabe.

[–] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The road to facism, paved by resignation.

We are just laying down and taking it

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But, if they carried on working wouldn't that make them Nazis?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

They have to refuse illegal requests. Refuse to do immoral stuff. They may be fired, but they make a paper trail of why they're being fired and immediately sue.
It's about standing up to the crap and obstructing it. Resigning does nothing.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

hopefully it's so that they can take positions where they can make a change

otherwise, yes I agree with you — they should be working from the inside to assist as much as possible, even though it may be frustrating. but that's how you push back.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Let me step aside so some sycophant will take my place and make things even worse.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I think they can do a lot more good inside the government than outside. Protesters are getting everything from pushed to killed now.