this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
624 points (99.7% liked)

News

37659 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least four leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week.

The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I see your point but I would counter with the fact that these are probably all lawyers who know the ins and outs of our justice system better than most people and should they join the ACLU or other organizations that are going to be suing the government over all of the civil rights abuses that they've been perpetrating these people will be invaluable.

Course that's all predicated on our court system not being corrupted before we can put through a regime change in this year's midterm elections. Trump is trying hard to shove in as many friendly judges as he can right now.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)

we can put through a regime change in this year’s midterm elections

It's incredible how many people still think that this will be a thing.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If Trump is actually able to stop or delay elections this year we have bigger problems.

I don't think you grasp just what it would take to actually stop elections.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue that you already DO have bigger problems, you just haven't come to terms with it yet.

Doesn't really matter what it would take. His plan is (and always has been) that if anything doesn't go his way, he takes it to the supreme court who he handpicked and has in his pocket. So either:

  • a) He manages to stop the midterms, or
  • b) He doesn't, but Republicans already have them rigged so as to not matter, or
  • c) They lose the midterms, Trump takes it to the supreme court, who hand the republicans the win based on "hand waved evidence of voter fraud by democrats and 'illegals'"...

Trump just gets bolder every time people say "oh we'll get out of this at the midterms." He's laughing at America.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It's not that we haven't come to terms with it, it's just that any resistance will need to be legitimized by outside forces to be recognized. If you look at the long history of tyrannical governments being overthrown, American and European figureheads always talk about whether or not the local resistance groups are legitimate in their concerns or not, which ultimately determines how much outside help is given.

Look at Gaza, there's a resistance force over there that has been branded as a terrorist organization (in certain cases, deservingly) which they now also have to fight a PR campaign online.

Going full blown delegitimizes any movement, and can justify further fascist ratcheting vs them just "claiming" violence happened against them, which EVERYONE can fully see is not happening. Sure they will claim it regardless but that loses them potential allies and any high ground.

We still have a court system. We still have elections. And both of those take time.

For anyone talking about where the lines are, that's them. Functioning legitimate courts, and functioning legitimate elections.

Until then, we are out there demonstrating peacefully, building up our communities, and giving them the rope to Nuremberg themselves with.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He doesn't have to stop them, he just needs to make brown people afraid to show up

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's infuriating. People are literally laying down and taking it up the ass right now while saying, "it's okay, it'll be fixed a year from now"

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

"it's ok, somebody else will fix my problems for me!"

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

How is saying that we "won't have midterms" anything but lying down and taking it up the ass in advance? You've already given up and it's only January.

I wish you doomers would go back to reddit.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

I say it because we need to be taking action today assuming midterms aren't happening. It isn't doomer, fuck off with that bullshit.

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Almost certainly it will be a thing but it will be more difficult than past midterms. In the meantime we got to keep fighting and doing everything we can to tank Trump's popularity (things such as talking to people who don't follow politics much) because the less popular Trump is and the less support the more likely people will refuse the risk of rigging/stopping the election.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 4 months ago

Please explain to me how the federal government can cancel elections that are run by the states.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like suing the government under this administration does not do anything because the current federal government rules with an iron fist. they have proven time and time and time again they do not care what laws or the constitution say.

In a sane world where law is respected, yes, I agree with everything you are saying. however, we live in an age where logic and the rule of law do not prevail. i feel their radical actions will catch up to them eventually, but at what cost? what if they do something that ends my life? I won't be able to enjoy when justice is eventually served...

currently, if someone is in a position of power and they have integrity, they should be holding onto that position for dear life while they weather this storm. the alternative leaves corruption to fill these vacant jobs with someone who has no integrity, in my opinion.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Doesn't do anything? Have you been ignoring the news?

Know what, no here.

https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

Looks like litigation is doing something.

Or if you want a more reputable source:

https://apnews.com/projects/trump-executive-order-lawsuit-tracker/

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

to clarify my statement: in my opinion, the wheels of justice are turning too slowly for a president that wakes up, waves a wand, and gets what he wants. his actions have real consequences for real Americans.

just last week, 10 billion dollars for child care was halted for states that are not republican. the effects malnourished children have every day they go hungry may last a lifetime.... and im just supposed to wait for the litigation you posted to get things sorted out? unacceptable.

I have no doubt the law is accurately tracking and will get things done, but the wait doesnt work for people that depend on social services

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, yes. I agree on that. But it's what we have. And it's exactly why they move fast and break things.

They're hoping to demoralize the American public to get further power.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I agree it is what we have as well, but there has got to be a better faster way to clean this mess up that isn't violent.

demoralization is working too, and its the only thing I have 100% control of, but I just cant give in.

im sure everyone's social circle thats reading this has at least one person they know who only works to divide minds instead of unite them, and its absolutely draining.

OK im off my soapbox for awhile, thanks for the conversation... I feel better lol

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You're proving the point that the courts work: just after DHHS blocked TANF funds to five Democratic states, a judge blocked it with a TRO:

A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration from freezing roughly $10 billion in federal funding for child care and social services destined for five Democratic-led states, keeping funds flowing until a lawsuit against the government can progress. . . . The decision came less than a day after the five states targeted by the Trump administration — New York, California, Minnesota, Illinois and Colorado — filed a lawsuit arguing that the freeze could create havoc among families with young children.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/09/us/politics/trump-child-care-funding-freeze.html

Outside SCOTUS the courts are holding, and moving quickly where warranted. You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

?

I didnt choose not to post a link, do not make invalid assumptions when you know nothing about me.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's not an invalid assumption, it's fact that you included only doomer, outdated news in order to support your wrong conclusion either a) without bothering to check to see if your information was correct, or b) you knew but decided not to mention it.

If you don't like false accusations then don't make them. I know that I have zero respect for that approach to posting, and between that and the lazy doomering that's enough of you for me to know. Blocked, bye.