this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
624 points (99.7% liked)

News

37675 readers
1417 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least four leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week.

The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)

we can put through a regime change in this year’s midterm elections

It's incredible how many people still think that this will be a thing.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If Trump is actually able to stop or delay elections this year we have bigger problems.

I don't think you grasp just what it would take to actually stop elections.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue that you already DO have bigger problems, you just haven't come to terms with it yet.

Doesn't really matter what it would take. His plan is (and always has been) that if anything doesn't go his way, he takes it to the supreme court who he handpicked and has in his pocket. So either:

  • a) He manages to stop the midterms, or
  • b) He doesn't, but Republicans already have them rigged so as to not matter, or
  • c) They lose the midterms, Trump takes it to the supreme court, who hand the republicans the win based on "hand waved evidence of voter fraud by democrats and 'illegals'"...

Trump just gets bolder every time people say "oh we'll get out of this at the midterms." He's laughing at America.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It's not that we haven't come to terms with it, it's just that any resistance will need to be legitimized by outside forces to be recognized. If you look at the long history of tyrannical governments being overthrown, American and European figureheads always talk about whether or not the local resistance groups are legitimate in their concerns or not, which ultimately determines how much outside help is given.

Look at Gaza, there's a resistance force over there that has been branded as a terrorist organization (in certain cases, deservingly) which they now also have to fight a PR campaign online.

Going full blown delegitimizes any movement, and can justify further fascist ratcheting vs them just "claiming" violence happened against them, which EVERYONE can fully see is not happening. Sure they will claim it regardless but that loses them potential allies and any high ground.

We still have a court system. We still have elections. And both of those take time.

For anyone talking about where the lines are, that's them. Functioning legitimate courts, and functioning legitimate elections.

Until then, we are out there demonstrating peacefully, building up our communities, and giving them the rope to Nuremberg themselves with.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He doesn't have to stop them, he just needs to make brown people afraid to show up

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's infuriating. People are literally laying down and taking it up the ass right now while saying, "it's okay, it'll be fixed a year from now"

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

"it's ok, somebody else will fix my problems for me!"

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

How is saying that we "won't have midterms" anything but lying down and taking it up the ass in advance? You've already given up and it's only January.

I wish you doomers would go back to reddit.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

I say it because we need to be taking action today assuming midterms aren't happening. It isn't doomer, fuck off with that bullshit.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 4 months ago

Please explain to me how the federal government can cancel elections that are run by the states.

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Almost certainly it will be a thing but it will be more difficult than past midterms. In the meantime we got to keep fighting and doing everything we can to tank Trump's popularity (things such as talking to people who don't follow politics much) because the less popular Trump is and the less support the more likely people will refuse the risk of rigging/stopping the election.