this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)
Movies & TV
23578 readers
165 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh no, a serious version of the story
It's gonna be shit
Even aside from the fascism, it's just so...boring.
I don't know how you make a story about a space-faring human civilization with man portable nuclear weapons and powered armor 'boring' of all things, but he did.
Actually I do, it's because he made it some 'realistic' portrayal of military service so there's basically no action, and lots of time for flashbacks to fascistic school lectures.
A lot of sci-fi falls into the trap of being so enamored with the (often cool) setting that it forgets to be a good story.
Yeah, I tried to read it back in middle school because I couldn't go to see the movie (lousy R rating) and it's so boring
Gave up after 30 pages or so
Apparently, Verhoeven had a similar experience, except he also found it morally disgusting
But I was a little 12 year old shit head, so I didn't have myself put together well
It really is boring, I gave it a reread a couple years back just to have read it with an adult set of eyes, it is a slog and the fascism is more apparent.
Highly recommend Armor by John Steakley and The Forever War by Joe Haldeman if you want some conceptually similar books to SST that will actually leave you satisfied.
I'd say Steakley delivers more power armored bug stomping action while still contemplating on the effects of conflict on those who participate and their societies, and IIRC the bugs are not mindless and do get some characterization discovered by the POV humans eventually.
Haldeman also has great action and really goes further into the effect war has on removing soldiers from the life they knew before. He leans into FTL travel and time dilation and it's a clear metaphor for that theme. There is also a big narrative payoff for the adversary species being an advanced civilization. Haldeman wrote a sequel The Forever Peace which is interesting but skippable IMHO. He also wrote a short story A Separate War about power armored soldiers fighting in LatAm and disgruntled vets trying to do direct action to bring a stop to the war, it's cool but really getting away from the SST vibe at that point. It's available in a sci-fi anthology that I haven't honestly read the other stories in.
Seconded.
RIP John
Armor is like if Starship Troopers weren't fascist and stupid.I'm so sad he wrote the piece of shit book Vampire$ instead of Armor 2 before he died
The only action outside training I recall is the opening chapter where they are bounding over a technologically inferior civilization and absolutely leveling everything with flame throwers and tactical nukes, I don't know how a film audience will see this as anything other than Iraq/Afghanistan but cool that it's happening, or IDF bombing Gaza but presented as a good thing. And then at the end when they get to fight the bugs, which deviously send out their workers/ women & kid bugs as human shields - so if you are making a faithful adaptation you either have to show that as a good thing the humans kill them or directly say the humans are bad.
I remember it devoting as much time to like an explanation of how making the nukes have a time delay and a speaker system that counts down in the native language was a genius strategic idea that made them way more effective as terror weapons since it meant their victims had time to be scared and knew what was about to happen, as it did to the actual action happening.
So much of the work is just Heinlein opining about the most galaxy brain shit, like the kind of stuff you'd expect from a kid raised on fashy anime except coming from an adult nerd in the 1950s.
i think the only thing i've read by him was stranger in a strange land and that starts off ok, though the libertarian stuff is stupid. and then as i remember, like halfway through the book it just suddenly jumps all the sharks and turns into a super weird sex cult jesus thing.
the mind boggles.
Yeah Heinlein was weird. His beliefs were extremely incoherent and changed drastically over his life, with the only real constant being a fundamentally right wing slant and him being a giant nerd who liked to speculate about sci fi shit a lot.
I still find it difficult to be too hard on him, though. He wrote once about how writing was a compulsive need, something he had to do or he'd get "physically ill", which kind of lines up with how every book without fail reached a point where you can see he stopped giving a shit about that story and just wanted to wrap it up to start something else. Also kind of lines up with the "Heinlein was an egg" theory. He was also less weird about female characters than most of his contemporaries, which is also strange given his politics. Another strange thing, given his politics, is that he learned Russian and visited the Soviet Union as a tourist with his wife. And when Philip K Dick was dying Heinlein apparently gave his family some large sum of money unprompted to help them out.
I remember that now that you mention it and thanks, I hate it. Notes of Israeli "roof knocking" wafting up from the cesspits of fascist fantasy.
Don't forget how the original writer made a high school lecture that was like a 5 minute scene in the movie 65% of his book
I keep meaning to check out the anime version(s) but I know it's going to be boring as fuck.