this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
705 points (99.7% liked)

News

35774 readers
1993 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 148 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Alternatively, the government must provide the name of the person or people who chose not to halt Alien Enemies Act deportations out of the U.S. despite his order — and Boasberg said he would refer them for prosecution.

Betting pool is open! Who do we think Drump and Co are going to throw under the bus this time?

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one. No need. Just ignore the court like he always has. Fucking joke.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And the court will keep wagging fingers.

A serious judge would deputize a citizen militia to arrest him.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A serious judge would have ensured a multiple time convicted felon was not permitted to become a dictator in the formerly most powerful country in the world.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lol that is not within the control of a random individual judge.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It no longer surprises me that murica is in the state it is in. It did at first, I admit. Perhaps it's my age. Or my general belief that people are good and care at least some, for their fellow man. Especially their own families, neighbors and friends regardless of their background.

But that assumption is continually proven wrong lately. People willfully blind themselves to the obvious. They refuse to admit when everything has broken around them. They live in this weird place of denial grasping at things that are no longer effective or even present.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Many of us are well aware that the system has been broken for years and that this was a likely result, but the system also made it very difficult to stop. (The mathematically determined 2 party stem we get with first past the post voting for instance).

Once democrats blew it by giving up local power, they and the country, were done.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Expecting change without forcing it and ensuring it happens. Sitting back and blaming the politicians. You are the citizens who put them in power and you are the citizens who can remove them from that power. No one else. You. Your countrymen. Your families and friends. You.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Can't they just claim it's an "official act?"

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 56 points 10 months ago (5 children)

That ONLY protects the president, and only from crimes he commits as official acts.

Now, we all know the mental gymnastics the GOP can do are impressive, but ignoring a court order is not an official act.

The deportation itself? That's the act that he's immune from.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President's minions and officials.

Trump is never going to round up the prisoners and fly the plane to El Salvador all by himself. He's got people to do that, and those people can be served with court orders and criminal contempt process.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

The immunity ruling also retained determination of an act to be official up to the courts.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And then if Trump just pardons them?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Correct. And then Trump just pardons them.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The bigger deal is that this immunity protection does not extend to the President’s minions and officials.

Not directly, but any employee or agent has no liability if they are following legal orders of their employer. So no - they cannot be prosecuted either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aramova@infosec.pub 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's meant to deter the "only following orders" Nazi defense.

In theory there should be checks and balances which prevent anything absurdly fascist, it's expected that it would be halted before it happens, but I suspect those who wrote this into the Constitution didn't count on the level of fascism we're seeing now.

We'll see how it works out.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In theory there should be checks and balances

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What do you think the Judiciary Branch is doing?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

By holding them accountable in court?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (8 children)

With zero repercussions for ignoring the courts.

It sucks to watch that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The legislative branch isn't the courts.

The legislative branch has been confirming all of the appointments.

The legislative branch could try impeaching him (again) but we both know that's not going to happen. Best case scenario is yet another vote down party lines. The magats are complicit. The corporatists are complicit. There are scant few voices that speak up for anything that doesn't benefit themselves.

The majority are letting all of this happen.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Duh. Thanks for the correction. Edited for accuracy.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha, that makes more sense.

So then to answer your question, the judiciary branch is being de-fanged. They're supposed to be a safeguard against all of this. But it's all just words on paper if nothing is enforced. Agent Orange was handled with kid gloves the past four years. Cases delayed, investigations slow-walked, and even the cases that ended in conviction saw zero consequences.

If judicial (those that aren't full owned, anyway) wants to try and reverse course... I wish them luck. I would love to be wrong about this pessimism. But given that a third of the public blindly believes whatever Fox etc tell them (and another ~third, probably more, can't be bothered to pay attention), it all plays straight into the persecution narrative. They are grossly outnumbered, outfinanced, and outgunned.

This is why we are seeing the phrase "constitutional crisis" bandied about. The groundwork has been laid over generations. The plans are being executed now.

"You're not allowed to do that" is not stopping any of it.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just courts are slow, but they’re getting there. First the judge issued injunctions, and they defied them. Boasberg was right not to charge them with contempt prior to a ruling to prevent evidence of bias during the inevitable appeal. They defied the ruling yesterday, and Boasberg immediately began the case for contempt today. They have until the 23rd to substantiate their defense. Boasberg has already stated that he will appoint an attorney if the DoJ refuses to do their job. The only way they’re getting out of this is with pardons, which is an outright admission of guilt.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem with rules is that they bind those that follow them and enable those that disregard them. I'm not against those trying to enforce the rules. I'm just hyper-aware of the damage being done in the meantime.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

We all are. The problem is we have no hope other than the courts succeeding. Projecting defeatism while they’re actively doing their job is unnecessarily discouraging to most. There are still more steps that can be taken to stop this.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s not entirely accurate. His immunity for “official acts of the office of the President” is to be determined by the presiding judge. An “official act” has yet to be defined, and there is nothing written about charges. He can and should be charged as well, so we can begin to define the limits of his immunity. Refusing to challenge it in fear that it will be overturned, is exactly what he’s hoping for.

[–] hamFoilHat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would have thought that paying hush money to a hooker wouldn't be an official act, but whatever.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Trump was convicted of that but the judge ruled there should be no penalty.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That only applies to the President.... but, whoever takes the fall can immediately get a pardon.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

State kidnapping charges would quickly follow.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My money is on martial law, and the summary removal or execution of Boasberg.

Wish I was being sarcastic, but the odds of martial law or war being declared on Hitler's birthday - the 20th, are far too likely for my taste. It would be within Trump's character to simply murder his foes, regardless of their place in society.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait, Hitler was born on weed day? How much better would the world have been if he had gotten into weed instead of coke and amphetamines?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago

Probably would have become a Bob Ross type of artist, rather than a avatar of hatred.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Now I'm wondering if any of those betting sites have anything going on for these scenarios lmao

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Later:

In an alarming development, the White House slams judges by releasing a new executive order titled “Trump finds probable cause for the Judicial Branch to suck on deeze nuts”; Schumer and Jeffries urge cooperation and reconciliation by wringing their hands and asking you for $13 before midnight to meet a nonexistent deadline. This message brought to you by Brawndo: The Thirst Mutilator!

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oooo a slam! We love slams! The drama! The excitement!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

AND HERE COMES SECRETARY POWELL FROM THE TOP ROPE!

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

OH SHIT HILLARY IS DOING A DEMONIC SUMMONING RITUAL RINGSIDE AND ... BY ALL THINGS HOLY HIDE YOUR KIDS ITS ZOMBIE JIMMY CARTER READY TO DROP THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HAMMER!!!!!

Oh shit this is getting good

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I voted Trump coz he's gonna fix the Conomy. Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

No one. He will just start dealing out pardons like it's a poker game. The US Justice System is dead.