this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
402 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) is proposing two amendments to an appropriations bill that would defund the various prosecutions of former President Trump.

He is adding to the defense of the former president mounted by Trump allies in the House as they circle the wagons in the face of four indictments.

Clyde, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, on Monday announced plans for two amendments to the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) fiscal 2024 appropriations bill that would “prohibit the use of federal funding for the prosecution of any major presidential candidate prior to the upcoming presidential election on November 5th, 2024,” according to a press release.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago (2 children)

prior to the upcoming presidential election on November 5th, 2024

They're not even subtle.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's so... Disappointing that they're rallying behind this decrepit, puss filled slug.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

It’s because they are guilty of shit too, and they are afraid of their shit coming to light as well

[–] archonet@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Even if this was added to the bill, there's no way it would ever reach the president's desk. And if it did, there's no way Biden wouldn't veto it.

This is just somebody signalling his loyalty to Orange Steal so he can swoop in and grab a little of his powerbase when Orange Steal is serving out his golden years in a jumpsuit that matches his spray tan.

I guarantee you, the Biden administration has a planned timeline they want to see this prosecution play out over, and it ends in a conviction before the election. It has contingencies in place for every bullshit delaying tactic conservatives will try to throw at them. He's going to jail for a very long time, and I'd say the majority of people are starting to wise up to this fact.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't even matter.

Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.)

Republicans have shot his bills down countless times because he's mostly a prick to everyone. Nobody likes the guy and he's hardly useful in any capacity to the GOP outside of a warm body who can physically push a "yea" button when they tell him to push it.

He's like MTG who is from the close by 14th district except more irritating to listen to and less well put together. Pretty much exactly what you'd expect from rural Georgia yet just less pleasant in pretty much every aspect than most Republicans.

Not only that, guy is a well known coward. His usual response to difficult things is to do his best impression of Zoidberging out of the situation. Guy is worthless skin who'd run for cover if someone started popping popcorn.

[–] Icalasari@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank fuck, I was worried for a bit that they could actually do something

The New Nazis are not very good at this, are they?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If they're on that team as it is it's because they're: greedy, stupid, cowards, or all of the above.

The New Nazi slogan is: "Wah, ich bin ein Kleinkind! Wechsle meine Windel, frau!"

And their mascot is: https://cdn.trendhunterstatic.com/phpthumbnails/81/81118/81118_1_600.jpeg?auto=webp

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t have thought the Cheeto Mussolini’s baby photos were in color.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let's hope not, or if so let's hope it's very hard to prove... If Biden has all that planned, it would suggest executive interference and politically motivated prosecution. Don't get me wrong, Trump needs to crash and burn, just saying...

[–] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shouldn't these clowns be charged with obstruction of justice?

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but spoiler alert: they won’t.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Yes. They won’t though.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exercising regular congressional powers by introducing legislation that cuts funding to a judicial body, regardless of the intent, isn't obstruction of justice.

When your sole purpose is to use extrajudicial force to subvert justice, how on earth is that not obstruction? Congress doesn't have unilateral authority to undermine the law for their own gain.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I remember when the Republican Senate wanted to delay a supreme court justice selection for an entire until after the elections so the American people could have a say.

2 justices later it's a month before the election and they cram a 3rd down our throats.

Fuck them forever.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Not before an election. During an election. Early voting had already started.

This sums up my feelings quite well. These children are fucking self centered.

[–] bluebooby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They also had plans to indefinitely delay supreme court confirmations in case Hillary won the 2016 election.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 78 points 1 year ago

Dems:

  • Benghazi This is stupid, but we'll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
  • Hunter Biden This is stupid, but we'll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
  • Whitewater This is stupid, but we'll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
  • And so on ...

Republicans:

  • Any charge POLITICAL WITCHUNT!! STOP THE PROCESS! OVERTHROW THE GOV'T!!
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I really don't understand Republican politicians at all.

They HATE Trump. They are almost all in record taking about about how stupid and unfit he is.

Trump LOST the last election. He hurt them badly in the last two midterms. He is dragging the party down.

I understand they are too afraid of his cult to go after him, but they could have just gotten out of the way and let him fail.

There second impeachment could have been the end of him.

These criminal charges could be the end of him.

All they had to do was say: "these are extremely serious charges, and we're reserving judgement until the judicial system delivers a verdict."

But instead they are pledging to pardon him, pledging to support him even if convicted, and trying to stop the trials.

INSANITY.

The answer is pretty simple. They do not want to set the precedent that any Republican government official, even the President, can be held liable for their crimes. Most were prepared to let him get impeached (but not actually find him guilty), lose his office, and hope he would fall into obscurity. A slap on the wrist and then a return to status quo is perfectly acceptable to them. But to have the audacity to actually bring charges for even blatant crimes? It's just not acceptable at all. What if this accountability thing carries over to the rest of government? What if they're actually held to the law? What if they face consequences for violating the law? What if corruption in government starts to actually be investigated and punished? No no, we can't have that. There won't be any Republicans left.

[–] III@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not insane at all.

They know that without the cult they lack the numbers to win any election. They, and their positions, are so frail that they bend knee to the absolute worst humanity has to offer for a chance to feel like they aren't as neutered as they really are. They can't even just let the Trump boot-lickers fade away, those willful idiots will just not vote - they have to win the scared racist vote, they need the wheezing Nazis, they can't survive without the religious who have turned away from their god for Trump.

It's fear, weakness and desperation. It is more sad than insane. Sad and dangerous.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

But instead they are pledging to pardon him, pledging to support him even if convicted, and trying to stop the trials.

Because if they don't, none of them stand a chance of being re-elected themselves. The MAGA Republicans are in a "sweet spot", so to speak; they're not in the majority even within their own party, but there's enough of them that no Republican can win without their support.

So the rest of the party basically has two choices. March in lockstep with Trump or be primaried by someone that will. Look at what happened to Liz Cheney. Deep conservative with a deep family political history. She crossed Trump and lost her primary by almost 40 points. This is what the rest of the party is afraid of.

And this is what scares me as well. The more these people start standing up to trump, the more likely they'll be replaced by another MTG or Boebert. And if you think the House of Representatives is a clown show now, imagine when half the House are just MTG clones.

You got some level headed replies so I'm going to put on my conspiracy hat. He is the Russian pick. He also gets along well with China. That is who the career Republicans are really afraid of crossing. You can talk all the shit you want as long as you vote for the right things. Including keeping trump in power.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's theatrical for their stupid base. They have to come up with "evidence" that Biden bad, democrats bad. What better way than to find super scary "evidence" and making up shit that never happened to go along with the grift?

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Republicans are driven, first and foremost, by a “fuck you, got mine” ethos. If, with whatever limited mental capacity they wield, they calculate something that tickles their “fuck you, got mine” neuroreceptors, they act.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Get fucked. Orange traitor is going to jail no matter what happens in the federal cases.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, Obstruction of Justice?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Also? They should Rico-ize the insurrection charges and scoop up all these traitors,

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh look someone wants to defund the police

No no no not like that

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm somewhat amazed we don't have any "conflict of interest" laws that say "This is clearly corrupt when you're making laws to attack ongoing judicial activities"

[–] mondo_brondo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This would require some sense of personal accountability, which is clearly missing amongst many of our so-called leaders.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That would require elected officials to act in good faith. Used to be you would want your elected officials to uphold the law even if it conflicted with party interests. Nowadays the law only applies to the minority party.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] keeb420@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

So the tough on crime Republicans want to defund the prosecutor?

[–] teamevil@unilem.org 19 points 1 year ago

Lock him too...if Trump is innocent why not get the trial over‽

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

Nakedly corrupt.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago

Republican proposes legislation that has no chance of passing. More real not fake news at 11.

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

It sounds like an effort to obstruct justice in furtherance of an indicted criminal enterprise.

[–] ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The boot licking is strong with this one.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

So a blank check for any federal crime

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

the only defense for him