150
both picked the wrong bus, sad
This bus is going in the opposite direction of where I'm trying to go. Why would I board the bus????
In fact, it could easily be argued that it would be in your best interest to do everything in your power to stop the bus
Metaphorical buses get the guillotine.
Real buses get nicer seats, better driver pay, and more stops and buses doing the same route.
This is why analogies are useless as arguments
Analogies are pretty great as arguments, in my experience. Bad analogies are obviously bad. And you can't use them against redditors because their answer is always "ArE You rEAlLy coMpARInG thoSe TWo tHiNGs?" Like, yes, that's the point of an analogy.
I find they are easy to subvert to whatever they want, they're good for explaining, but not arguing.
That's when the people throw the bus driver onto the street and take the bus where people actually want to go.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'd rather walk, thanks.
Cool so I can vote PSL?
Right? This analogy is bad because there's no room in it for "I picked this bus and then my bus lost so now I am just sitting here sulking."
load more comments
(1 replies)
there are only two buses. both buses are going to hell! and you better get on one of them or else the other bus will win the bus contest and be declared the king of all the buses.
It's more a single trolley line with a lot of people tied to tracks at this point.
And you have a lever that changes the trolleys color from red to blue. And you would dare not to pull it?!
Me taking a bus straight to a concentration camp: “well, what are you going to do? I couldn’t wait for THE ONE!”
NONE OF THE PEOPLE SAYING THESE THINGS HAVE BEEN ON A BUS OR ANY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN 30 YEARS
Why are liberals obsessed with using fanciful analogies when they could simply discuss the real things themselves? (I know why)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I Drive the Bus That is Running Over Thousands of Palestinians Every Day. Here's Why That's a Good Thing:
In this essay, I will-
I can respect that. So I'm voting 
. Critical support to Jill Stein though. I've loved her since I was a kid.
Telling this to the kids getting hit with rubber bullets in a state run by a liberal governor in a city led by a liberal mayor.
Voting isn’t marriage - it’s public transport.
- under constant destruction in amerikkka
- has hostile architecture meant to make doing it as uncomfortable as possible
- the mayor is going to send in the national guard to make sure citizens must pay to do it and can’t do it for free
- melon husk is enacting a worse alternative by burying cars underground to make sure no one can do it conveniently
- the infrastructure is rotting, causing ecological disasters
- technically pete is in charge of it but he won’t do anything about the system except let it continue to rot
No matter how i try to plan my route online it takes me through the seventh circle of hell??
Not getting on the bus to Auschwitz, sorry not sorry
Worst Trolley Problem Solution Ever
so if i want to get to my local library i should hop on the greyhound to LA? great plan, I'll get right on that
load more comments
(5 replies)
Just 
harder folks! You'll voot so hard that you'll defeat the evil forces of communo-fascist Trump!
Look, the only two busses that run from here are the ones to the Death Zone and the Ultra-Death Zone. Do you want to go to the Ultra-Death Zone? You like Ultra-Death? I didn't think so. Get on the Death Zone bus and stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.
This is a good analogy because if both buses are headed in a direction you don't want to go, you wouldn't get on either.
They've been using this one for the last 3 elections and I've always pointed out that when both buses are going in the opposite direction of where you want to be you simply do not get on the bus.
Both busses are driving towards doing a genocide, I want to go the opposite direction of not doing a genocide. Which bus should I get on in this tortured metaphor?
I wonder if anybody sharing that image actually uses and likes public transportation.
You already know they don't and we know their reason for hating it is because they may encounter a poor and/or homeless person
I think it makes more sense to compromise in a marriage than it does to deliberately get on the wrong bus.
load more comments
(1 replies)
My Uncle Rim-Shot told me the best voting advice I ever heard.
You see, voting is like riding a bus with a fine lady.
You don't need to marry her in order to get off at your destination.
And that's why there's no such thing as a perfect bus stop.
They can only get by by question begging the whole "Is not being Trump enough?"
As it turns out, the bus that promotes genocide does not get me closer to where I want to be, especially since this bus was what people took last election and it got us here. There is no such thing as adequate evidence for these people, only religious dogma.
Fine, I'll walk.
So.. is cycling activism, or?
Voting, which we ruin, is just like public transport, which we also ruined.
I for one always take that bus, even when it drives the opposite direction from where it said it was going, crashes, and explodes
load more comments
(2 replies)
And if there's no lines going anywhere near where I'm going? I'm not jumping on a bus for the sake of it. If there's only two lines in town and they're both taking me further away from my destination, then I most certainly won't waste my money on a ticket to nowhere.
I'm probably going to walk instead.
And if the bus doesn't go in the direction I want to go, I simply don't get on.
That's fair. The third party is the one doing that.
"no, not like that..."
I'm not trying to get to genocide and US global dominance, so fuck right off libs
I mean... it's not incorrect. I think voting for PSL is the way too
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
150 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15896 readers
409 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS