[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

Uhhhh ugghhh uhhhhh brainsssss

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 9 points 21 hours ago

Omg you cracked the code michael-laugh

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 27 points 23 hours ago

Accelerationists must be having so much trouble deciding who to vote for rn

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

Anarcho-Antirealist-Bidenist

I did a bit about it on my alt

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've talked to them, and they are an Anarcho-Bidenist and also the most ultra of ultras. They're so idealist that they believe reality can literally be reshaped on a fundamental level just by belief, so anyone who doesn't take that approach to create a perfect utopia is a liberal, and also transphobic because your vibes are the only thing stopping otherkin from physically transforming into dragons and shit. Oh, but also, you have to vote for Biden while you're imagining this utopia, and that's not liberal because reasons, and if you don't then you're transphobic, but also they'll make jokes about trans suicide and if you tell them it's inappropriate or offensive then you just don't get it, because you're stupid.

I tried to explain it but I think I just made it even more jesse-wtf

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 36 points 1 day ago

They've gone into full defense mode, they're just trying to hold the line and cope. And Biden was down even before the debate. Absolutely no chance the gaslighting will work on anyone who's not already a solid Biden vote, and that's just not enough to win.

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago

This is unironically how people think tax brackets work irl

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

My line is, "If not voting for someone means supporting them, then rest assured that Biden will have my support."

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

Yes, let AI handle stock trading, this is a great idea and definitely doesn't have potential to collapse the global economy

Unrelated emoji: elmofire

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 38 points 3 days ago
[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago

They left off ligma males smh

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Corporate needs you to find the difference between these advisors same-picture

106

That said, I voted for him in the last election, and I will again out of harm reduction. He has improved on policy, but l even if he didn’t, the American people do not get a vote on whether or not to elect a senile President this cycle.

You can have any President you like, as long as he’s senile. If you vote, we’ll get a senile President. If you don’t, we’ll get a senile President.

The question is whether you want senile and gleefully cruel®, or just senile(D). I’ll take just senile.

screm-aAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

107
submitted 4 days ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
35
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

I know some of the basics but I'm still confused about certain rules. When does an S become a SS and when does it become a $ (and what about $$)? I also don't know how to handle words that don't have an S or a K in them.

I was hoping to translate the core BDS list, but some of them are proving challenging:

  • HP (Hewlett Packard)
  • Siemans
  • AXA
  • SodaStream
  • Ahava
  • Sabra
  • Puma
  • Israeli fruits and vegetables

I was thinking something like HeWaffen PacKKKard and SSodaSStream but I'm not sure about the rest.

Thanks.

Edit: Forgot to list Puma

96
Friendly reminder (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
8
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

I'm going to an event soon and the last time I was there there were some of those awful street preachers with megaphones shouting bigotry. They're a nuisance and nobody wants them there, but it's a public festival and evidentially they're allowed to be there.

I tried looking online (reddit-logo)and most of the advice was stupid lib shit, ranging from, "Call the cops and tell them they're violating statute blah blah blah" or, "Just ignore them, you can't change their minds and engaging just feeds their persecution complex." Obviously the cops do nothing, I don't care about changing their minds or what they think I just want to shut them up. But I also don't want to get arrested and if possible, it'd be nice to avoid disturbing the other people further.

Most likely, I'm just gonna have to endure it, but I thought I'd raise the question for brainstorming bc it feels like a common enough situation that other people will encounter it too. Best I can think is screaming something back at them emilie-shrug

UPDATE: I ended up just wearing a bunch of pride stuff and then they weren't even there lol

64
submitted 2 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
56
submitted 3 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net

Well have you considered

114
wwyd? (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
43
submitted 4 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net

Graphic design is my passion

39
submitted 5 months ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net
0

Somebody had to do it.

1
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

That's it. Our instance requires us to stop responding if you explicitly ask us to. It's right here buried in our Code of Conduct

Any discussions may be opted out of by disengaging.

In the past, this rule has only applied to the specific user you say it to. I'd like to suggest going forward that if someone on another instance uses it, we treat it as applying to all of us.

Unfortunately this rule wasn't communicated clearly before, so I'm making this post for visibility.

Edit: As the comments clarify, this has to be done in good faith, typically just a one word "disengage" comment. If you add more stuff to the discussion and then say "disengage" at the end, you're not disengaging, it's a way to put a stop to a toxic argument not to get the last word in.

view more: next ›

Zuzak

joined 3 years ago