450
She should definitely go for it.
it's like stealing a kids candy and saving the world at the same time
Oh absolutely she should. No question.
New?? As in a 3rd one???
Wow, I had to double check this wasn't on The Onion
Plz do it Ms. Carroll 🙏
Imagine for a moment that you are president of the United States and you are given an intelligence briefing with information that is vital to an allied nation's safety. Under no circumstances are you to share this information with anyone. You are then in a candid two-hour conversation with a jovial diplomat from a nation hostile to that other nation. If you didn't keep your wits about you, you might accidentally discuss the secret information.
Donald Trump is not a man who has ever had his wits about him.
Your premise is flawed. Trump would purposefully say the secret things in order to show off.
rosebud!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!;!
If only we could put him in a room and delete the door. 😔
And then the urn as well
But then he might pee himself and we know his feelings on that...
And the floor.
“based on false accusations made about me by a woman that I knew nothing about, didn’t know, never heard of.”
Can someone explain to him that you don't have to know someone to sexually assault them?
"Never seen her, she doesn't exist, who is Donald Trump, never knew him" --djt probably
Chubbs is going to have to cough up a bigger bond. I wonder if there’s a world record for biggliest person in debt..?
That's the thing about chubbs. Under the right circumstances, they just keep getting bigger and bigger
“Why do you keep saying that you didn’t sexually assault E. Jean Carroll?”
“Because I pay her every time I do!”
“…”
“…”
"~~Spank~~ sue me harder, mommy!" -Donald J Trump
DJT is just a global-scale findom sub.
You know that episode of The Office where Michael gets a talking to by his bosses for constantly making sexual jokes and then immediately after leaving the meeting he makes a "that's what she said" joke? Yeah that's Trump leaving the court house and immediately tweeting defamatory statements.
I think its time for Trump to recieve some kind of care. He is obviously not well. I'm not qualified to say what his illness could be, but his behaviour just isn't normal.
The man has dementia. Like, pretty far along, too. At this point, he's just being used as a MAGA figurehead because they fed the beast of the US right wingers far too much that they backed themselves into a corner.
People can sue him into oblivion until his handlers finally accept he's unfit, which they can't do.
As a non-American, it's fun to watch play out. I fully believe people will try to 'weekend at bernies' him into office if it comes to it.
He's got too much poopie in his brain hole
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Attorney Roberta Kaplan, who represents 80-year-old writer E. Jean Carroll, noted in a statement that the statute of limitations for defamation in most jurisdictions ranges from one to three years.
“As we said after the last jury verdict, we continue to monitor every statement that Donald Trump makes about our client, E. Jean Carroll,” Kaplan said.
Her statement came after the Republican front-runner in this year’s presidential race angrily complained during a nearly two-hour speech at a Rome, Georgia, rally on Saturday that he had “just posted” a $91.6 million bond to cover the January verdict by a Manhattan jury while he appeals.
He told the rally that the verdict was “based on false accusations made about me by a woman that I knew nothing about, didn’t know, never heard of.”
Trump, 77, followed up his Saturday rally statements with an interview on Monday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” in which he labeled Carroll as “Miss Bergdorf Goodman” and said, “I have no idea who she is.”
The trial judge instructed the jury that it was only to determine what damages, if any, Trump owed as a result of his 2019 statements.
The original article contains 466 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
LOL.. he just can't help himself
In a way, I'm glad.
Lmao what the fuck this is incredible
makes me sick these people dealing in tens of millions when I would be so happy with just $83.
This pretty much scuttles his appeal for $83m being excessive, too
Clearly it's not
Do it! Do it! Do it!
Quickly now: what's 83 times 16?
Bankruptcy
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
450 points (98.7% liked)
politics
19090 readers
3778 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS