210
submitted 8 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 94 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

LOL, if you think that's bad, wait 'til you find out that the suburbs can't afford roads, either!

Car-dependency is a fiscal disaster on both the micro- and macro-scale, let alone everything else catastrophic about it.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

It is also a disaster on an environmental scale, and not just due to emissions.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

For sure! I could write a novel about "everything else catastrophic about it" (and probably have by now, if you concatenate my previous Lemmy and Reddit comments on the subject), but that would distract from my point that the headline "Americans can no longer afford their cars" applies in more ways than one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CoreOffset@lemm.ee 73 points 8 months ago

Cars have always been relatively expensive to own and operate and the American way, unfortunately, has been to take out lines of credit in order to purchase vehicles they could just barely afford.

It's insane to think about but the average car payment for a new vehicle in 2023 was $726 and the average loan term is nearly 70 months!

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago

I've always lived by two rules when it comes to vehicles:

  1. Never buy new. Buy approximately two years old used low mileage

  2. If I can't afford the vehicle on a three year note, I can't afford the vehicle

Additionally, always secure third party financing and have it in your back pocket, but don't tell the dealership that part until absolutely necessary. They may try to match it, but their fine print has always had catches it in that make it a worse option in my experience.

I'm not sure if these rules will work going forward as prices seem to have doubled in the past three years, and I'm loathe to ponder how purchase is getting replaced by subscribe.

My current car is ten years old with 110k miles on it. I keep it super maintained because I can't stomach the thought of my next buying experience.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a young adult who wanted to avoid debt, my rules were somewhat similar

  1. Car must be used, for sale by private seller. Avoids dealership fees, warranty fees etc.

  2. If I cannot buy it in full, in cash that day, I cannot afford it.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

I bought my first car on credit. After my last payment, I diverted that money into dedicated savings for the next car. Kept me from lifestyle creep and paid myself interest instead of the bank.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

The sweet spot for me was buying cars in roughly the 6 year rage. Specifically Toyotas and Hondas. My last car was an '06 Accord and it was a fantastic car. Affordable to buy, no bullshit, cheap to repair and required repairs rarely, drove great, solid interior. I would have kept driving it for another 5-10 years easy if I hadn't moved to a country/city where driving is totally unnecessary.

My buddy bought it off me and did some minor things to it and is still happily driving as his daily commuter right now.

[-] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I totally agree with your rules here, however I recently helped my mom buy a new car (2023 Nissan Murano) and while sitting with her in the finance room deciding on warranty stuff I realized that cars are mostly 100 interconnected computers on wheels. This means the most likely thing to break on a car is a computer. This is something only the dealer can fix probably. Because of this you can’t get the same kind of warranty on a used car, only new.

The warranty my mom on this new car is great and it will cover any kind of computer issue for years. If she had gone and saved a bunch of money by picking a used car from the same year or 1-2 years old she could not get that warranty, and if a computer issue popped up years later it could be terribly expensive.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

The computers are, by far, the most reliable parts of a car. They're not subject to mechanical stresses or wear, and the real-time/embedded operating systems are far more fault resistant than desktop/phone OSes. The computers also mean that you can buy a $20 OBDII scanner and have the car tell you what's wrong with it. Maybe an extra $10 for an app that will decode most of the manufacturer-specific codes. The difference between those $30 diagnostics and the $10,000 system the dealer uses is mostly that the dealer system includes all the manufacturer codes and step-by-step directions for fixing each fault.

[-] ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

They can also change things, like idle speed. You also need one for any form of electric vehicle.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Maybe an interesting aside, i have an associate who makes a living being the guy mechanics call. When they can't figure out how to do what the computer is telling them to do, they have a contract with his company where he'll walk them thru the repair. He can see all the data from their shop obdii thingy too, and helps troubleshoot remotely.

He says the effect of this system over the years (in his experience) is that in-shop mechanics are increasingly untrained guys 'off the street' who 'don't know shit from shit'

Just thought that was an interesting tidbit about the industry or even a sign of the future of that job

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 9 points 8 months ago

On any device with moving parts, the parts that fail most early and often are the moving parts. Solid state electronics are not moving parts.

[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Bro genuinely bought a Nissan trying to avoid excessive maintenance 💀

[-] CoreOffset@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I think statistically speaking the absolute best value is a 5 year old car that has been at least reasonably well-maintained. The vast majority of depreciation happens during those first 5 years.

For those that do need to finance a car, a three year loan term should be the maximum. I think you are 100% correct on that. There are people with car loans that have terms of 7 years. It's sad that people are setting themselves up for failure like that. If you can't afford the monthly payments on a 3 year term then you really can't afford the car at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Brand new cars in 1973 were like $2500 ($17000 in today’s dollar). No one wants to sell compacts in the US anymore because people love their giant SUVs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 69 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Stop buying suvs and trucks. Buy compacts and small sedans. As those markets erode it just makes everything worse.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm a multi tradesman and I run about in a 1.2L Korean shitbox with a trailer when I need it

Same tradesman in the US apparently needs a 6L V12 pick-up simply because of his micropenis? Yeah thanks for the pollution Brad/Chad/Tad whatever

[-] rhadamanth_nemes@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Don't look up "rolling coal".

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Really wish I had those EMP things from 2F2F to use on those useless coal rolling fuckheads.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 2 points 8 months ago

It's the most Republican thing you can do with a car, except maybe driving into protesters.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

He isn't a tradesman. He is either an office worker or unskilled labor.

The only practical use I have ever seen in my life for those oversized pickups is in South East Asia I rode on one that had been converted into van to go up and down this shit road into the mountains. Moving people. So unless you make a living loading up 8 people at a time to bring them up a terrifying grade mountainside you don't need a vehicle like that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 43 points 8 months ago

If we'd always been accounting for all the actual costs of cars, including externalities, most people would have never been able to afford them, we'd recognize them as the very costly luxeries they actually are, and not have completely dismantled our ability to live without them in every city except NYC, Boston, Chicago, DC, and San Francisco.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 10 points 8 months ago

You could say that about everything. If you would account for all actual cost no one would fly, eat steaks, own 2 TVs or change phones every 2 years either. We would buy things that last 10-20 years and replace them only when they are broken. As we used to...

[-] Erismi14@midwest.social 15 points 8 months ago

Slippery slope aside, I think reducing unnecessary consumerism would be beneficial for our most vuneral populations. There would be a lower barrier of entry into the economy and more resources would be available at a lower cost for people who cannot afford them

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 12 points 8 months ago

Oh, I wasn't making a slippery slope argument. I meant that this is what should happen. We exported most of the devastating impact on the environment and the terrible working conditions to developing countries so that we can enjoy tons of crap we don't really need. If things we buy would reflect the actual costs we would have to limit how much we consume. Of course no one would like it.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

Well, it's a mixed bag. There have been absolutely incredible advances in efficiency that do enable a lot of things to genuinely be much cheaper and accessible than they used to be, but some of that is also just the ability to throw external costs on other people (climate change, for instance). This is why things like carbon taxes are so strongly supported by economists.

Steak, for instance, is hugely subsidized by how little farmers have to pay for water, along with other government benefits. Flying has environmental costs, but those are reasonably quantifiable and, per flight and per passenger, not that insane as far as I understand.

I do think consumer electronics are a bit of a different story though. Yes, cheap labor plays a huge role there, but those labor costs aren't completely divorced from reality; the fact of the matter is that east Asian labor is actually chap. Ocean shipping and modern production plants are insanely efficient, though again climate costs need to be captured.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 7 points 8 months ago

But east Asian labour is cheap because of bad working conditions, weak workers' rights and no environmental protections.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Stop buying brand new Escalades and super F150s that you don’t really need.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 13 points 8 months ago

I can barely afford the 2015 Subaru Crosstrek i bought back in July. Even 8 year old base model cars cost over $16,000 these days

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Hard to find a decent manual in my area for sub-10, too. Lucked out on a 20-year old f150 with very little wrong with it for 4 grand, then another 4 grand to fix it up.

Would've spend 7 grand on a Ranger with a machinegun rod knock.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dingus182@endlesstalk.org 22 points 8 months ago
[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Right. Cars aren't really on the market. These cramped, low visibility, shit-mileage behemoths are the reigning force on the market now.

[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

– and right up my chuff.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's self inflicted. Americans don't buy inexpensive new cars. Now everything new is targeted at upper middle class and financing is expensive + pent up demand from COVID is exacerbating the issue pushing used buyers into the new market.

But you can still buy a Mitsubishi for under 20k and an Impreza for 22k. People don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

On the other hand, the world could have its first trillionaire within the decade!

And you know how like 1 billion seconds is 31.7 years...guess how many 1 trillion seconds is in years...

...you ready?A little under 31,690 years

But unlike Americans living in an unaffordable country, our future trillionaire earned it...right?

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

For added context: 1 million seconds is "just" 11.6 days.

100,000 seconds is 27.8 hours.

10,000 seconds is 2.8 hours.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Y-….you guys used to be able to afford cars?

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

not to mention insurance costs and taxes

used vehicles cost nearly same in most cases and in poor condition

yes let us blame trucks not the $7.50 minimum wage and the inflation and what have yous

biden and electric vehicle are not the jesus of our times

going to take a lot to make travel affordable again and on that note the more traveling costs the less people do it and the less they travel the more stuck in the state they are at they become

way more than prohibitively expensive vehicles here this is a means to keep citizens in place and poor

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
210 points (97.3% liked)

News

23001 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS