"bug" aka purposely making firefox unusable on one of the largest websites in the world so more people use chromium
(these allegations are based solely on prejudice against google and its subsidiaries, and do not necessarily hold true in reality)
"bug" aka purposely making firefox unusable on one of the largest websites in the world so more people use chromium
(these allegations are based solely on prejudice against google and its subsidiaries, and do not necessarily hold true in reality)
perfectly reasonable and logical prejudice, i might add. we really need to get people to use alternative search engines. google has been sucking fat balls for a long time now. either people are going to start to switch, or the frog will continue boiling.
Google:
Even if it's for only a short period of time, it's enough to do a lot of damage. Especially as people are becoming privacy conscious and are looking to start using Firefox.
What does this mean, I'm confused?
Yes. So was I when I wrote this comment. I don't know why I wrote Chrome.... ๐
Makes way more sense now, lol.
After intending to for years, I've recently switched to DuckDuckGo after getting increasingly frustrated with Google's search results. This makes that decision feel all the more like the right one.
I find it hard to say this is deliberate on Google's part but at best it's yet another case of Google blatantly skipping over Firefox testing.
I did so, too.
I've done so repeatedly over the past years, each time giving it one month to evaluate how useful its result are to my productivity before deciding whether to swap back.
After now giving it three months, I can say this:
In theory though, DDG is nice. If they can improve the quality of their results, I can work around the maps issue. But it's still significantly behind Google, but I also have to see this in context of course: Google has a fuckton of money to throw around, for the budget they have, DDG is impressive.
I tried signing into Google today on Firefox and got 'sigin in using a safe browser. This is not a safe browser'. I refreshed the page and it was gone and I was able to sign in. What the heck.
Google should follow their own advice and kill the user agent.
Or you know, Don't use fucking Google?
Nowadays Google sucks ass anyway
I'm on 121.0 mobile and have no issues accessing Google.com. Not that I use it anyway but figured I'd test.
same, i'm on 121.0.1
I really don't understand why Google isn't being taken to court over the obvious monopolistic strategies they've been implementing.
It was fixed in a few hours:
https://status.search.google.com/incidents/hySMmncEDZ7Xpaf9i32C
And it was never broken for Chrome.
Google can do plenty of damage to Firefox in a few hours and the best way to do it is to simply not include Firefox in their testing. If you don't know the standards the web is built on, it makes FF look unreliable, despite it being Google's bug.
Real professional engineers at Google. Reading the browser name is just so hard.
another reason to not use that horrible, ad-infested site. even if caused by a "bug".
Interesting, from Germany the Google homepage loads normally but shows the old version (while the search results page uses the new version). Either they partially fixed it, or Firefox in its beta version already works around the problem in some way.
It works here with the latest version. But moved to Kagi recently and very happy with the search results.
Thank you for the screenshot of a blank page.
ah yes, a "bug"
It's not a bug. It's a feature.
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox