nieceandtows

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How many unprecedented does it take for things to become precedented ?

Curious, is the dog bothered by the smell, or is it just the humans?may be they're bothered far more considering their sniffers

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What bubble gum do you chew?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Are these free to use, or do you have to pay?

That's impressive, nice!

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did people hate the fiddle slop back then?

Accountability

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Except, game dev companies are not competitors for MS (meaning XBOX), but essential for their survival. What's the point of extinguishing your source of supply?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 16 points 5 days ago

Yeah but Frodo is a baggins, not a givins

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The pendulum as to swing all the way before it swings the other way.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What's the most realistic end of the war and what's the best case scenario? Any thoughts?

 
 

 

 
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/51247328

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 

I use speckit, and while I like the spec/clarify/plan/task/analyze/implement loop (although it can get a bit overwhelming at times), I don't like that I have to start with writing a spec and implement it to begin with. I am looking for a more of a design phase before the spec phase, where I can talk about the overall application architecture, and then start writing specs for implementing pieces of it.

For instance, let's say I want to build a github repo provisioner that 1. creates repos with desired setup, and 2. bulk edit repos with secret updates, yaml updates, etc. I don't want to build both the features at the beginning. I want to first build only the create portion, and then do the bulk edit feature later on. With speckit, I can do this by only telling it to create the spec for the build portion, but later if I want to build the bulk edit portion, the whole application might need to be changed in important places, because it wasn't a 'planned' feature when it was first designed. I want instead to have a design phase where I describe and maintain a doc with the whole application, and when I start the spec for the create portion, the agent can understand that this create portion is only part of a bigger application and can design/implement the create portion accordingly.

Have you come across a situation like this? how do you handle your big applications? Please advise.

 
 

Keeps alerting me to empty boxes of 'person' detected with 90+% confidence. So frustrated right now.

 

She's an only child, and we didn't grow up in America, so she's a bit naive on a lot of things. Her teacher advised us the other day that she's such a sweet girl, but middle school could be brutal for her because of that. What are some wholesome shows I can watch with her that helps her get ready for the world?

EDIT:

This is an astounding collection of shows. Thank you so much! We've started watching Amphibia, and really enjoying it so far. I'll add all these to the backlog. Thanks again!

view more: next ›