this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
684 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

87956 readers
2948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bluejuh@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, in one of the worst ad placements I've seen in my life: McDonald's asks you to "Activate Spicy Mode" partway through this article.

An excerpt from an article describing an AI used to create CSAM, followed by an ad prompting the reader to activate Spicy Mode The ad is revealed to promote McDonald's Spicy McNuggets

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Goes well with their new fish sandwich mascot Sea Sam!

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

unsurprising, the technology has been capable of this for years all it took was someone being brazen enough to make it into a buisness

So by viewing ads you get CSAM in your browser cache. Therefore you can be charged with 1 count of possession for each image saved. Failure to use an ad blocker is dangerous.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 29 points 1 day ago

Let's make toxic masculinity work for good.

"Real men don't use AI."

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As bad as this guy is (literally just one of THE worst guys), I can never get over how his wife is a pediatrician and they have three daughters and she's just along for the ride? The damage that family does to millions of children, and especially girls, through their direct action and inaction is astonishing.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 24 points 2 days ago

Must be an ironclad prenup

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I really feel bad for parents like you. What a horrible era to live through. Younger people like me, who don't have any direct siblings or significant others don't have much to worry about. But I can't even imagine what it must be for people with families.

[–] Leather@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The Epstein class supports kiddy porn for profit? Shocked! I tell you shocked!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago

I'm so happy that photo exists.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 24 points 2 days ago

zuck attended epstein's party at one of his "properties" along with other well known billionaires in the past, he definitely knows or is involved.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 297 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Other ads animated a photo of a 14-year-old Instagram influencer “showing off her new sports club uniform” into “a video of her performing oral sex.”

Ok that's enough internet for now. Please alert me when it is safe to return.

[–] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 123 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Internet? That's enough humanity. We had a... run. Time to burn it all down.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

fwiw, I think this is their actual endgame: use digital to convince people this isn't a small cabal of the ultrawealthy causing so much of this harm.

They say dictators don't need majority support, only a majority of people doubting themselves.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 days ago (10 children)

At least 56,575 children are sexually abused every year.

That’s according to U.S. child protective services records.

The number is staggering—yet it only reflects child sexual abuse that is recognized, reported, and found likely to have occurred against children ages 0-17.

FBI crime data shows that 51% of reported rape is perpetrated against people ages 0-19.

That’s approximately 61,754 young rape victims every year, including our most vulnerable children, adolescents navigating middle and high school, and young adults just beginning to move through the world with more independence.

It's really not a small cabal of the ultrawealthy though.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

The point I was making was that it isn't just a small cabal of the ultrawealthy that commit these crimes. A point that went right over your head in your attempt to downplay the severity of child rape.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Don't wait standing

(I dont know if this translates, in argentina we day "get yourself a chair" or "don't wait standing" meaning that something wont happen)

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

The English equivalent would be "Don't hold your breath"

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The meaning of the idiom is remarkably clear in English. I propose we adopt this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we say, "don't hold your breath," in English.

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Or “don’t count on it” (because if you did you’d be counting for eternity)

I’m sure there’s more I’m not thinking of right now…

“Why don’t you wish in one hand and shit in the other, and see which one fills up first”

… yeah, I like the chair one

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago

Ah, in English we say "don't hold your breath" for that, although sometimes it's also used for things that might happen eventually but it will take a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Uk what sucks? We knew AI was capable of it from start. Hell, we even saw this happen on twitter. And yet what we did? Just let it happen. Gave a slap on the wrist to elon, and did nothing to address this.

I remember when I first saw nano banana I immediately deleted all my profile photos, and looked up on wayback machine to see if any of my photographs were archived or not. Yeah it's kinda late and it must be somewhere on some hidden archive, but atleast I've bought myself some time. Since that day I have maintained a strict policy amongst my friends and family that I'm not going to be in photographs that are going to be posted online.

Also I want to be clear, I'm not saying it's corporations responsibility alone. It's responsibility of individual people to not use it. This is freaking crime. But I'm pissed how world is trying to make it the new normal, and regulators have been too sluggish to respond to it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 140 points 2 days ago (5 children)

There's a nonzero chance oligarchs are pushing this to normalize pedophilla.

Like how Ghislane Maxwell was super involved in early reddit and their main draw for a long time was "legal" sexualization of children.

Especially since it's a common accusation they make against "the left". Most of the time when they accuse, it's a confession.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago (4 children)

pushing this to normalize pedophilla.

They don't really need to manufacture how normalized pedophilia is in our society. They're simply capitalizing on it.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Doesn't the widespread outrage kind of speak against this, though?

Here in Hungary, it was a scandal regarding the cover up of sexual abuses of young children under state protection that sparked the overthrow of Orbán, and was the only thing that managed to crack that nut finally. It's hard to overstate how much it galvanized people, even his own supporters, against him.

I don't know, I understand that it's demoralizing and I can even buy the argument it's more normalized than it should be, but the very existence of outrage against figures like Epstein (which seem to me to be extremely widespread, though maybe I'm missing something being out of the country for some years at this point) or this Hungarian scandal lead me to think the vast, vast majority of people do not find it remotely normal or acceptable. I don't think tarring all of society with the brush that it's been normalized is accurate. Or I'm misunderstanding what you mean by normalized.

[–] madmantis24@lemmy.wtf 8 points 2 days ago

It's extremely telling that your comment is the first I've heard of that aspect of the election in Hungary. The mainstream press in the US effectively shrugged and said "I guess they just got tired of him"

In fact, it feels a lot like how the press in my country "explained" Obama's first election. Just a vague "Americans are tired of the Republican leadership and wanted change," Like the torture and disappearing of anyone they could sweep under the abstract wars of the time wasn't outrageous enough

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hell, I vividly remember the old /u/ViolentAcrez thing, and tons of users being butthurt when subs like /r/Jailbait, /r/CreepShots, and /r/Upskirting were taken down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 69 points 2 days ago

You know how in the movie Idiocracy they used " 'baitin" as a shock factor, and had all the woman characters be demeaned and sexualized?

Somehow, this is a lot worse.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 45 points 2 days ago

Avoiding all meta apps is a good decision.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 35 points 2 days ago

Good to know what the data centers get built for.

[–] DGen@piefed.zip 28 points 2 days ago

Bro what the fuck

[–] Cheese_man@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This country hates its children. And all vulnerable people. We continually treat them as disposable, exploitable resources instead of people deserving of protection and care.

Today's kids regularly have to rehearse finding cover from a hail of bullets at school, try to prepare themselves for an unlivable ecology, and wonder if any random picture of them will instantly be turned into porn via the new basis of our country's economy. Capitalism is going great.

yes, you can tell this by just looking at all the things that require ID to use (amtrak for example)

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

We always have treated our children as disposable. It was difficult even to prohibit factory child labor, which faced serious resistance from the courts. Some states are even reversing that. (Agricultural child labor is still legal.)

I good deep dive is the You're Wrong About on Juvenile Justice (here on YouTube.)

TL:DR we have a whole subset of crime for kids, delinquency which is stuff that's a crime for kids to do, but not adults. And delinquency crimes are totally used as a pipeline to get kids into the prison industrial complex.

Also, our public education system has always had containment as a priority. When kids are not working but their parents are, they get into mischief, and thus we needed somewhere to cage them. This, and not edification, is why school is mandatory.

Children have fewer rights than adults do, and the law enforcement and the justice system takes full advantage of that to exploit kids.

This is the United States of America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aReallyCrunchyLeaf@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 days ago

Abolish Facebook

[–] tal@lemmy.today 37 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Legend has it that every new technology is first used for something related to sex or pornography. That seems to be the way of humankind.

---Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of HTTP and HTML

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2002/mar/03/internetnews.observerfocus

The dirty secret that drives new technology: it's porn

The Guardian, 24 years ago

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›