It would open up using Pokémon as an example of prior art in court.
Saledovil
Eh, the problem is inherent to how this particular market works. Once a game is developed, the cost to distribute it further are negligible compared to the development costs. This also means that a single game can, theoretically, satisfy the entire market. Hence, at any given time, only small percentage of games are successful.
He's imagining them as physical things that can be hurt. And apparently, the voices can feel his violent fantasies. At least, that's what's implied by the story.
What's that, and why should it be destroyed?
Wikipedia has quite stringent standards for citations and style. Just enforcing those should be enough to keep slop out.
Cocktails are just various spirits mixed together. And this is beverage mixing. Not usually thought about, but deserving of respect nonetheless.
Million dollar company sounds impressive, but I don't think that is impressive. Like twenty employees already imply a million or more in expenses annually, and require corresponding revenue to sustain.
Except that cars are genuinely useful.
1940 was 85 years ago, so unless said 👵 is over a 💯 years old, she was only a child back then.
Number 4 is so that you can edit the gay out in China.
Twitter's biggest asset is its market dominance. People can't leave Twitter because all their followers are also on Twitter. If Twitter were to be banned in the EU, that would be a big market share where a competitor could emerge. Since said competitor would not be constrained to the EU, once a new market leader of the EU market emerges, it would soon challenge Twitter in the US and internationally.
Does it come with immunity from extradition?