Did they though? Don't they control Open AI to the point where they could force Open AI to keep Sam Altman as CEO?
Saledovil
That, for example, didn’t work for the mob
And yet, it's oddly difficult to convict a mob boss. Only when it was made illegal to be a member of the mob in the first place (RICO-act) was the US able to meaningfully push back the American mafia. Seems like it works to me.
(Doubly so since this was a video chat and the AI-created girl was not made up to look like a 21-year old play-acting 14.)
That is indeed a piece of evidence the prosecution could use to successfully get a conviction, because it disproves the assertion that the person thought they were chatting with an adult. Why didn't you bring this up earlier? You'd make a terrible lawyer. And the fact that you bring it up as an afterthought shows that you don't think of it is important. It's almost like you care more about what the person has been accused of, rather than whether they actually did it.
Also, please stop acting as an apologist for pædos. It’s really kind of gross. (And go ahead and bring in the pædo-evasion: "AKSCHUALLY IT’S EPHEBOPHILIA!)
I'm defending the god given right of every man to a fair trial, whatever they may be accused of. Your belief that basic rights go out the window once the crime somebody is accused is significantly heinous enough is antithetical to rule of law and harmful to society as a whole. And, ironically, it makes it easier for real criminals to evade justice by making it easier to convict the innocent.
Thing is, in a criminal case, the prosecution needs to prove the defendant's guilt, hence they would need to prove that the defendant though they were pursuing somebody underage. How would they go about this?
Virginia Foxx brought up the national debt in her reply. (Which is somehow never a concern when giving tax cuts to the rich or raising the military budget).
How to solve the national debt in 1 simple step:
- Don't pay it.
Law of Headlines: If it's a yes/no question, the answer is "No".
Hey, China, you could get a king's ransom for any of those.
What is a four dimensional cube?
2 three dimensional cubes, A and B, and each corner in A is connected by a new edge to it's equivalent corner in B. This is also called a tesseract.
What is a two dimensional cube?
A square.
In general, if you have an n-dimensional cube, you can get an n+1 dimensional cube by doubling it, and connecting each corner with it's equivalent corner.
A 0-dimensional cube is just a single dot.
A 1-dimensional cube is a two dots, connected by a line.
A 2-dimensional cube is 2 lines, connected. Also called a square.
A 3-dimensional cube is 2 squares, connected. Also called, well, a cube.
A 4-dimensional cube is 2 cubes, connected. Also called a tesseract.
A 5-dimensional cube is 2 tesseracts, connected.
In general, this is called the n-dimensional hypercube.
And continuing this, each edge on an n-dimensional cube will, together with its copy and the two edges connecting it to its copy, form another face on the n+1 dimensional cube. This new face will border exactly one face on the original cube, and one face on the copy. It's also bordered by two other connecting faces.
So, basically, if I start out on a face on the original cube, I can walk onto a connecting face, and then walk around all four connecting faces, and walk to the copy face. From there, I walk to another copy face, over the four connecting faces, and then back to the original cube. This way I should be able to continue going back and fourth between the cube and the copy, always walking across all the connecting faces.
I got a rubics cube here, with sides white, red, blue, orange, green, and yellow. For each of these faces, there exist 5 additional ones on the tesseract. For white: white, white_copy, and white_c1 to white_c4.
The solution is white, white_c1, white_c2, white_c3, white_c4, white_copy, red_copy, red_c1, red_c2, red_c3, red_c4, red, green, green_c1, green_c2, green_c3, green_c4, green_copy, orange_copy, orange_c1, orange_c2, orange_c3, orange_c4, orange, blue, blue_c1, blue_c2, blue_c3, blue_c4, blue_copy, yellow_copy, yellow_c1, yellow_c2, yellow_c3, yellow_c5, yellow.
They are destroying houses so that the residents don't return, which is displacement, which in turn is genocide.
Cartels loosing members is in general good. UAE produces more oil means lower profit margins for oil producers, and less money for pro fossil fuel lobbying.
Luckily, the Ukraine War has shown that Russia isn't ready to fight, either. Also, it's the US fighting in Iran, not Nato. Though the US is the strongest nato member.
Only the "find a mate" bit shows that you're making a joke.