this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
371 points (97.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41308 readers
3353 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

At least OP said women and not "females".

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago

Rrrreallly setting the bar high, are we?

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 37 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Kinda bordering a strawman here, but if I said

why are men attracted into the airhead type?

there would be bunch of dudes saying they are into intelligent women, and that it's just hollywood.

Dylan says "Why don't girls like me," sulking. "Hey," "Dylan" says the offscreen voice.Dylan looks over to see a giant amalgamation of women, some of them are falling as it moves. The amalgamation speaks to him. "It's me, all girls. Only you understand that all women share a consciousness, Dylan. Be one with me . Link yourself to the hivemind." Dylan has stopped sulking, as he now only cowers in fear.

(Sidenote props to the artist for drawing all those people one by one)

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago

Zach is like Randall Munroe for people who prefer eyes to not be attached to heads 🤩

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Is this an egg meme?

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 69 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Incelligence is a heck of a term.

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

Should be word of the decade.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, that's a fun take but realistically there are plenty of women who put a lot more stock in looks (just as men do) an immediate financial ability.

That jock who got a job that's physically demanding might be making more out of high school, but the IT nerd who went for they education and got a good tech job was likely on a slower burn path to self-improvement with better pay, possibly improving looks over time (or at least less of a beer belly). At least before AI started killing the tech sector again, so maybe the jocks will be coming out ahead for awhile.

Also, there's also nothing wrong with being a good dude with average intelligence who works hard. Just don't pick an red-hatred idiot. And intelligent nerds who don't learn social skills can absolutely still become nasty incels.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Just don't pick an red-hatred idiot" took me a sec to parse.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

It's a typo but the intended group still fits! Love it.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Hey... my Pepe folder has been collected and curated carefully for decades

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What about the women that is into pepe lore or WW2 theory?

I cant decide if there's more or less of them than the ones that's into 4chan incels?

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Taking a wild guess: I feel like there may be a few more women into history than sexism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What about the women that is into pepe lore or WW2 theory?

They are irrelevant, because they are both Fake and Gay

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago

Can confirm: am a woman named Gayle "Gay" Fake who can't get enough cartoon frog facts and FDR/Göring slash fiction.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Speaking of juicy mammoths, who's the lady in the picture?

[–] Raw_Toast@fedinsfw.app 9 points 6 hours ago

Asking the important questions.

[–] Raw_Toast@fedinsfw.app 7 points 6 hours ago
[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Some thirst trap which is ironic since she's holding a drink

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 65 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Also, this is just plain wrong.

Some women are attracted to intellectual minds.

Some women are attracted to physical strength, some women are attracted to maternal instincts, so on and so forth.

The problem is this question is usually being asked by someone who thinks that responding to every factual statement with an inflammatory counterpoint qualifies as intelligence.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Also, this is just plain wrong.

A greentext that's wrong? Highly unlikely.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

Not on this Internet!

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 hours ago

The weird definition of intelligence they are using (how to succeed in life) does kind of cover that. The definition of what success is, and the millions of ways of achieving it covers just about all variations.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

women are people with choices

they make different choices

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Impossible. If women had choices, then they'd have a diversity of off-spring with a wide spectrum of forms, traits, and behaviors.

We know that can't be the case, because all men are identical and perfectly interchangeable, except for a tiny variance in peak performance which they use to sort themselves from Sigma to Omega for the purpose of obtaining Da Big Sequesy to produce more Sigma clones.

[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

So success in life means actual intelligence? I disagree with that.

Success ≠ actual intelligence.

Plenty of very successful people who are complete morons.

Women are attracted to success, regardless of actual intelligence.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say humor is the better indicator. It boils down to the ability to connect ideas in creative ways, as well as keeping a longer context window in conversations

It's not a direct 1:1, but what is intelligence really? There's many types, and they're all a combination of domains

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's actually a pseudoscientific neuromyth¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷.


[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's more that intelligence implies success rather than success implies intelligence.

Actual intelligence boosts chances for success, but it is not required for success.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The way the world is going, intelligence is playing less and less of a factor. You're either born into it, or you're a wage slave struggling for life.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Success looks different for different groups of people, unfortunately. A slave could be considered more successful than another, while remaining a slave.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Intelligence is actually slightly negatively correlated with success by a lot of metrics (earnings, years of life, health) and the best predictors are general big 5 attributes like openness to experience, low neuroticism, high conscientiousness (hard working), and extraversion. Those characteristics are way better predictors of life success.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Do you have any references for this? As far as I know the literature, the debate about "what matters more" is still ongoing with some research arguing in favor of personality and other research in favor of cognitive ability. This research seems to agree that the relationship between cognitive ability and life outcomes is generally positive, and I am not aware of any convincing evidence to the contrary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wieson@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

What is success? Being surrounded by people you love and trust? Living life without regret? Sitting on hoards and hoards of money? Planting an endangered tree?

[–] NewDark@lemmy.today 5 points 8 hours ago

It's just correct enough for the tiny quipy descriptor to get to the real takedown after.

Also this is 4chan, grade on a curve.

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's usually “how to succeed in life” intelligence, not “realization of abstract k-skeletons as k-skeletons of intersections of convex polyhedra in R^2k−1 in life” intelligence if that doesn't make you money.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

Incidentally it's true. Granted I'm asexual but I'm only attracted to intelligence.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

And how do you succeed in life? Step 1 is to have rich parents. The term commonly used for those seeking out people from rich families is gold digger.

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If your only measure of success is wealth, that's kind of sad.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

It's not, but anyone that tells you wealth doesn't matter, is either lying or trying to sell you something also.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You have already failed. Success is not measured in wealth.

If you are having a good time with friends/family around a fire pit with a total cost of £0. You are succeeding more than the richest man on earth who can't get anyone to genuinely like him.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

For those three hours, then they have to pay rent, buy food, pay bills. And try to survive, which wealth makes immensely easier.

[–] Haquer@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

But enough about Elon Musk.

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If your only measure of success is wealth, that's kind of sad.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago

Wealth for wealth's sake, possibly, but i'm not gonna start throwing shade at someone else's life goals.

Wealth is , however, a good baseline to build upon to achieve other metrics, up to a point at least.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Metacognition, hot

Cognition, not

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Thinking about thinking is just brain masturbation, which is the pinnacle of homosexuality.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] limer@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

I feel attacked

[–] jankforlife@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

LMBO Some day he's still in the burn unit to this day

load more comments
view more: next ›