this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
445 points (97.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41308 readers
3237 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 22 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

So success in life means actual intelligence? I disagree with that.

Success ≠ actual intelligence.

Plenty of very successful people who are complete morons.

Women are attracted to success, regardless of actual intelligence.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's more that intelligence implies success rather than success implies intelligence.

Actual intelligence boosts chances for success, but it is not required for success.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The way the world is going, intelligence is playing less and less of a factor. You're either born into it, or you're a wage slave struggling for life.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Guess that depends on where you are. Many places in the world have very high social mobility along with solid welfare and pension systems.

Maybe somewhat less that 40 years ago, but certainly much better than the last thousand years overall.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Success looks different for different groups of people, unfortunately. A slave could be considered more successful than another, while remaining a slave.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Intelligence is actually slightly negatively correlated with success by a lot of metrics (earnings, years of life, health) and the best predictors are general big 5 attributes like openness to experience, low neuroticism, high conscientiousness (hard working), and extraversion. Those characteristics are way better predictors of life success.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Do you have any references for this? As far as I know the literature, the debate about "what matters more" is still ongoing with some research arguing in favor of personality and other research in favor of cognitive ability. This research seems to agree that the relationship between cognitive ability and life outcomes is generally positive, and I am not aware of any convincing evidence to the contrary.

“…conscientiousness (hard working)…” Yeah, surely, if you define working hard as just receiving your father's or grandfather's wealth (or at least, part of it) as your inheritance.

When you actually look down at this rabbit hole, you find that the entire premise where these supposedly "predictors" rely, the meritocracy, is actually just a scam, maybe the biggest one. Because social movility is totally broken because prices, rents and taxes are going crazily up while salaries are dropping dramatically, and meanwhile some fucking bank takes your money as a monetary rescue for a fucking son of a bitch billionaire which movement caused an economic catastrophe.

[–] NewDark@lemmy.today 6 points 14 hours ago

It's just correct enough for the tiny quipy descriptor to get to the real takedown after.

Also this is 4chan, grade on a curve.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

What is success? Being surrounded by people you love and trust? Living life without regret? Sitting on hoards and hoards of money? Planting an endangered tree?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say humor is the better indicator. It boils down to the ability to connect ideas in creative ways, as well as keeping a longer context window in conversations

It's not a direct 1:1, but what is intelligence really? There's many types, and they're all a combination of domains

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That's actually a pseudoscientific neuromyth¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷.


[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]