I don't remember the differences (and there aren't many) but Ridley Scott himself was asked to make a "director's cut" of Alien for the Blu-ray release and he did... But he said something along the lines of "It was hard to figure out what to change. The theatrical cut already is the director's cut. I made it the way I wanted it to be the first time around."
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)
movies
3750 readers
480 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Star Trek VI. The director's cut interrupts the extremely dramatic mind-meld interrogation scene with another obnoxious flashback every time a character is implicated. I suppose between releases the director must have lost faith in his audience's ability to follow the story without having their hands held.
Any of the original Star Wars trilogy films.
It’s probably worth pointing out that the original theatrical release of what we today call A New Hope was just released as Star Wars, wasn’t even called episode four, didn’t have a title crawl, and included that scene with Jabba but instead of it being Jabba it was some guy in a fur suit, so it’s going to depend on which directors cut you’re talking about.
and included that scene with Jabba but instead of it being Jabba it was some guy in a fur suit
The original theatrical release did not contain Jabba at all. A scene was shot with a human actor, but never used in the film.
We wouldn't get Jabba in the film until the 1997 Special Edition, which replaced him with CGI. In the documentary alongside that release we do see the original clip and Han stepping on Jabba's tail is due to Harrison Ford moving around the human actor in a way that doesn't work with a tail in the way.
We also later got an updated Jabba for the DVD release.
https://screenrant.com/star-wars-jabba-hutt-human-actor-change-reason/
The Star Wars Movies have had fans create despecialized editions, to match the theatrical releases. Ive made sure to keep a copy of them on my media server. I really enjoy them.
I think the intention of this post is to look at theatrical/physical release vs the directors cut.
anything Zack Snyder gets his hands on. literally anything. he'll take an ok theatrical release and then turn into 3 hours of sheer boredom.
In my experience, all of them.
The directors cut isn't about watching the movie itself, but examining the process of producing a film - dissecting it.
Two different experiences.
I'd argue that James Cameron's "The Abyss" director's cut is superior to the theatrical. The extra 25min introduces some extra plot details in the climax that really flesh out the ending
The director's cut for Blade Runner is a massive improvement on the theatrical version because it removes the narration the studio forced in. A lot of director's cuts include a few scenes that make a movie work when they were cut or changed to meet some silly studio meddling.
What about watching a directors cut unknowingly and loving it?
/end of thread!!!
I might say Donnie Darko as the Director's Cut may complicate the movie a bit for those who prefer the mystery of the theatrical one.
I would say the musical choices are better in the theatrical cut as well.
Justice League
How??? The Snyder cut wasn't anything to write home about but the theatrical cut was terribly boring.
The first release was a cringe yet-another-superhero-movie, the director's cut was masturbation over a cringe movie made even longer.
The theatrical Justice League has two things going for it: brevity, and Batman's "just save one" mentor moment with The Flash, which was nice.
Everything else about Snyder's cut is better. It looks better, it sounds better, each scene in isolation plays better, it has fewer cringy jokes. Most importantly, it retains Cyborg's story arc, which it turns out was the heart of the whole damn movie.
Oh, to me both were bad and, generally speaking, I've been overdosing on superhero movies, it just never stops and each one is even more slopish than the last. I just remember the director's cut of this one leaving me even more apathetic than the theatre cut, when we were promised that it would make more sense, be more interesting, etc. It was not. The superhero slop has to stop.
If you aren't having a good time either way, the theatrical's 90 minute running time is a huge advantage. But then you should probably just walk away, rather than try again with a 4 hour cut. I enjoyed Snyder's version well enough once, but I'll likely never rewatch it just because of the time investment required.
If I may, I'd like to recommend the animated movie Justice League: War (2014). It's basically a shorter version of JL17 and ZSJL, all three films are adapted from the same comic. Of the three, this is the best.
Mallrats. The extended cut is just awful and Kevin Smith agrees.
I remember seeing a print release of the Clerks and Chasing Amy screenplays that had an intro by Kevin Smith. He talked about how the reception of Mallrats was really disappointing because the general thrust of most reviews was “how dare he sell out like this?” But there was one review that said “it’s clear Smith loves slapstick comedy but he just doesn’t know how to direct it.” He felt like that was a review of the movie and not of the movement he was imagined to be part of.
Leon, The Professional. Besson is a creep.
Stargate. The director's cut tried to add to much plot, and the best bits by a mile were the action scenes!
The theatrical cut of Legend, by Ridley Scott, has an awesome prog rock soundtrack.
The director's cut has some generic fantasy movie musical noodling.
It's not even close.
I swore that was the case but i honestly didn't by find much on it.
Most.
Gladiator. The director's cut adds a lot of unnecessary content, which just messes up the pacing of the movie. And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
Deadpool 2.
Theatrical jokes are better.
I didn't know there was a director's cut of any Deadpool movie. I knew there was the PG-13 version of Deadpool 2 called "Once Upon a Deadpool" that featured Fred Savage like in Princess Bride
Empire Records. The directors cut tries to make Rex Manning a more sympathetic character but it just works better with him as a villain.
I don't know as to whether Rex was really a villain. He was just an arsehole.
Mitchell, however, was a prick from top to bottom.
Sonic Adven-wait.
I am assuming that you are lumping extended cuts, special editions and all non-theatrical release versions under the broad category of “Director’s Cut”.
Also to echo what Onomatopoeia posted, all of them.
With all of that said, I have found every Director’s Cut of James Cameron films to be worse than their theatrical counterparts.
Cameron tried to clean up the ending of The Abyss and just made it more silly than the theatrical version.
The additional stuff he added about Ripley having a kid in Aliens wasn’t bad, it was just unnecessary as was the stuff with Newt’s family finding the ship. All of that just messed with the paceing of the movie. Also there is a scene with auto machine guns that has made it into “edited for TV” versions that really don’t belong.
All the stuff he added to Terminator 2 was meh.
I am not going to comment on the Avatar non-theatrical cuts as people love to bitch about those movies.
Cameron is a very focused strong director and it is easy to see why the stuff left out of the theatrical versions of his movies wound up on the “editing room floor”.
Alien 3. Though technically not an actual director’s cut (which is bad in and of itself), the assembly cut was sold as being the the next best thing.
But imo its a sloppy version of the film. The ox scene was nonsensical and unnecessary, the ending scene was ruined with bad fx and bad scoring and I disliked the pacing.
The Legacy cut is imo the best version of the film.
I also prefer the theatrical cut of Aliens. The relationship between Ripley and Newt is just enough. The director's cut mashes the maternal relationship button too hard. Seeing a little bit more with the colonists is nice, but doesn't make up for the other imbalances.
I prefer The Assembly Cut