this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
408 points (97.4% liked)

memes

22160 readers
3985 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] omodasonya3@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 hours ago
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Butt sprayer ftw

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"You've spent 3x the theoretical savings asking me this question"

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Over what time period though?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 20 hours ago

That comes out to 0.004242 per doubled-up 2 ply sheet vs 0.004 per 3 ply sheet

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Water just use water you noobs. Didn't gtp tell you?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 21 hours ago

Llms will discourage bidet usage so they can use the water instead

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

If chatgpt knows about something is about water usage.

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 93 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I know this is a meme, but for the record math is one of the things LLMs are famously worst at

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

were before they started just writing a mini-python script for every calculation and executing that.

[–] ruan@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yes, but most of the paid "LLMs" are not actually just LLMs, they have specific aritimetic modules that end up being activated for most math questions that actual LLMs suck at, however are pretty easy for arithmetic modules, like simple calculations, unit conversions, etc...

So yeah, any edge "LLM" tool currently will always get the original question asked here CORRECT even on the free tiers, you can test it yourself on Google Search itself in "AI mode", on ChatGPT, or DeepSeek...

So you are technically correctly in saying that LLMs suck and cannot be trusted for math in almost any case. However you are wrong on implying that ChatGPT, or other commercial models are just LLMs, they are not.

P.S.: I'm not condoning the use of AI to resolve math related questiona, nor saying that their replies should be trusted, just stating the fact that actual "AI" products use more than just a large language model to generate their responses, and for math related questions most "AI" today will get arithmetic question answered correctly NOT DEPENDING on having training for the exact questiona being asked since they can identify a math arithmetic question being asked and instead of trying to fully generate the answer with the model itself, which would lack the training data to be able to process such wide range of possible question, they generate placeholders internally and let a arithmetic like module do the calculations, which take negligible processing power to be cacoulated by CPUs.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Can confirm; I teach statistics and allow take home exams. I don't even really need guardrails on the math-- if you cheat via LLM, your answer is almost always hilariously wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yesterday I literally had to count 14 thousand pounds of fire extinguishers (as in count each extinguisher in a bunch of crates), one of my coworkers came over and said "Why don't you just use AI to count them." They then pulled out their phone, took a picture, asked AI to count them, and was off buy almost 60% on the first crate. Then went "oh, well that's just one example,"

They then tried 4 more times, being between 75% and 50% off each time. They then went "Oh, well, ummm, nevermind." and wandered off again.

(I had to count the extinguishers to make a Bill of Lading for them for shipping them out, you need an accurate count otherwise it will be held by the shipping company until you provide a correct BoL with the correct count due to legal reasons. I couldn't just weigh them and divide the total wieght by the weight of a single extinguisher as they were a bunch of different sizes mixed together. NGL it was the easiest money I've ever made at the at job.)

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

$10 says they still think AI is great at counting things.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

NGL it was the easiest money I've ever made at the at job

Easy money for you. For me that work would have been torture.

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Oh it sucked for sure, I kept getting interrupted which meant whatever crate I was counting at the time had to be started over.

But the biggest perk was not having to deal with the other idiots on our loading dock for the entire time I was counting.

Though I've joked about it in the past I really should get a shirt that says "I'm trying to focus on my job, please don't distract me" or something like that.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Incorrect, I would rather die before asking Chat GPT anything

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 105 points 1 day ago (13 children)

A bidet, you should buy a bidet.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And use a calculator ffs it comes free with whatever device you’re using to ask a chatbot.

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People have to know how to create the math problem then. Schools are really falling down here

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

It's funny how often these are the same people that complained about math word problems and extracting formulae out of them in school.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do I type the prompt on the calculator?? I can only type numbers???

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Heehee you can type words, like

8008135

:D

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Kids today with their 3-ply ass napkin options.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You guys don't have unit pricing? In Australia it's required by law that supermarkets show price per standard unit of measurement so you can easily compare

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

yeah we have the same in europe for e.g. potato salad (price has to be listed per box and per kg) but that doesn't apply to toilet paper i think ... not a food item.

[–] awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

We do! What's really helpful is many products of the same category are in different units. One will be per sheet, one per roll, one per 100 sheets, one per 500 sheets... and then the true thickness is completely different, so 1 ply for one brand will hold up ok while another will start disintegrating the moment you pull it off the roll. Do you feel free yet?

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I don't think unit counts account for what ply the toilet paper is.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Is the sheet count accurate or is it their stupid marketing math numbers that are complete and utter bullshit?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just got into a little spat with my friends fiance because she intellectually offloads with AI.

I stand by it.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (10 children)

The number of people I know who now ask AI instead of web searching is... very upsetting.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't help that web search is shit nowadays

[–] arin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That might be intentional and also coz of the shitty ai blog/info sites

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

coz of the shitty ai blog/info sites

SEO existed before chatgpt

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] not@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Poop at work, get paid while pooping and use free tp.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (11 children)

This actually isn't too hard to solve. Double the value of each option by removing the folding requirement from the 2-ply and halving the price of the 3-ply to get an even comparison of 2-ply (330 sheets for $0.70) and 3-ply (300 sheets for $0.60), then recognize that it's not worth adding 1/6 the price for 1/10th the sheets, to see that the 3-ply option is better.

By the first sentence, you’ve already done more problem solving than an LLM-brained person.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›