this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
69 points (94.8% liked)

News

38445 readers
1709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 4 points 20 hours ago

After Taylor farms paid a visit to the White House and after a million dollar donation\bribe to trump...

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

...shortly after the CEO had a meeting with Trump. Coincidence?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure it did soon as they paid the bribe.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The owner to Taylor Farms is a huge trump supporter

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So is this legit, or did Taylor Farms just bribe the appropriate official?

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

They literally gave $1M to Make America Great Again, Inc. last year just after the FDA announced it was suspending implementation of the food tracing rule. So, yeah, they paid the bribe last year.

I mean it's the Trump Administration's FDA full of his sycophants so I would unfortunately have to guess that it's as legitimate as any other claim this administration has made.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The FDA said Saturday’s positive test was an erroneous result based on false amplification.

Sounds like someone in the FDA lab fucked up. Possibly any retests too, since I doubt they went straight from initial positive test to recall. What a shitshow. I wonder if it’s from inexperience or overwork due to cuts.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

So you're suggesting that the most rational explanation is that the FDA did the initial test, got a false positive, then presumably did it again, and got at least one ADDITIONAL false positive, for a protist for which the species in question is the only one in its genus which uses humans as hosts. The company found it so credible that they PUBLICLY copped to it, but then it turns out that it was ALL false positives? You're suggesting that that is the most likely scenario?

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 5 points 1 day ago

Sounds like someone in the FDA lab fucked up.

Nah

Possibly any retests too, since I doubt they went straight from initial positive test to recall. What a shitshow. I wonder if it’s from inexperience or overwork due to cuts.

The FDA didnt mess up.

The FDA found the culprits, and then Trump was bribed to tell the FDA to find evidence that the initial test was a false positive.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like the trump administration’s statement is in any way dependable as truth

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’re right, a gutted FDA couldn’t make mistakes. It’s probably a vast conspiracy that involves the very scientists racing to figure out the source of this also being complicit in covering it up.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Both a gutted FDA and a large company paying the Trump administration a bribe for preferential treatment are pretty equal in likelihood.

But considering this company has already paid a bribe to the Trump administration to get rid of food tracing rules, the conspiracy is probably more likely.

Without an independent lab verifying the samples, you should take the FDA's retraction with a pitcher of salt.

The trump gutted fda. No matter how it’s sliced trump is the failure

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

You know the answer

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never buying their shit again. TF can go fuck itself.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

Now we figure out how to find what products they sell.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why did Taylor Farms not have produce tested themselves? We need a third independent testing to verify who is lying, the FDA or Taylor Farms. And if TF is a false positive, how did people actually get sick?

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 1 day ago

It’s a messed up world when we can’t be sure the FDA isn’t lying.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

So I learned that the leaders of Taylor Farms went to the Whitehouse. After the meeting they are allowed to continue poisoning usa people. Hmmm. Read between the lines?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well, if Taylor Farms destroyed a bunch of their lettuce based on the initial information from the FDA, I wonder if they have a good lawsuit?

[–] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna go with somebody was bribed to make this happen

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Okay then… where is the actual source?