883
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 62 points 1 year ago

In Scotland, to where he emigrated in order to move his goalpost business.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Of course you go for the no true slippery slope climbing, red herring walking, goalpost moving Scottish straw man argument

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago

A true Scotsman would have founded his goalpost business in Scotland.

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Damn Scots, they ruined Scotland!

[-] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You Scots sure are a contentious bunch

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

it's hard to reconcile with others on the internet when you don't know anything about them. their personhood gets reduced to a series of opinions and stances. I'm worried that engaging with people through the lens of formal logic will just further disconnect us from one another.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

One might even call it "astute"

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

yeesh does that hit home, last day or two i've been trying very hard to have a conversation with someone and their replies were wild assumptions about me and insults based on said wild assumptions, no actual arguments or anything, just being mad at a version of me they fully made up in their head. At first i felt kinda hurt by their words, i think rather understandably i'm not a fan of being insulted even when the insults make little sense, but then it just became really confusing how confident they were being about things they made up.

i think as long as you don't try to psycho-analyse a stranger on the internet basing on a single conversation you had you'll be fine lol. stick to arguing with their points and trying to understand their stances not attacking them personality or extracting a whole made up image of who they could be

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a coworker who if I had met her online, I probably wouldn't have gotten along with her. We have such completely polar opposite and radically different viewpoints and philosophies in life. We are exact polar opposites in things like political ideologies, religious notions, moral conventions, philosophical views on life, the state of the world, new technology, etc.

But despite our radical differences, she is among the people who I care most about on this planet. If I met her in some sort of internet debate, I would hate her and she would hate me. But in person, when you slowly get to know people over time, it's different. You realize that they are human just like you are. You both just want to survive on this planet and make your own way. You both have struggles. You both just want to joke and get along with one another.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I get where you're coming from but that's why I find it especially egregious when they activily choose to pursue willful ignorance and vote against their best interests.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Elegantly said.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Ackchyually, it should be down the slippery slope because physics, facts and logic. 🤓

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Look at this idiot here, not understanding the herring's natural state to swim up slipperiness.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Dammit, I was not counting on biology to be the crux of my argument. You win this round, Simpson!

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

am i stupid for thinking herrings were birds?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Herons are birds. Maybe that's what you're thinking of.

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago
[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Or... It's a flying red herring!!

[-] li10@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

That’s a really stupid thing to think.

I totally knew they weren’t birds 👀

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe they've been in disguise this whole time.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Birds aren't even real!

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago

People on the internet will literally take the worst interpretation of what you're saying in order to argue against it. While you're stuck clarifying your point, they just keep attacking (often without advancing any competing thoughts of their own).

If I weren't so passionate about standing behind my comments I wouldn't keep falling for it, but somehow I do every time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I hear you. I keep falling for it too.

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 10 points 1 year ago

The instinct to correct stupid people is a strong one.

[-] AceSLS@ani.social 7 points 1 year ago

So you're saying people are angry jerks that just want to fight? What exactly does standing behind your comments mean, like pushing grandma down the stairs or something? You horrible person

/s if it wasn't obvious enough

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

same, it's hard to let go of a futile conversation even when you feel like the other person is arguing in bad faith

[-] 7of9@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

I'm in this comment and I don't like it.

[-] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The frequency of strawman and slippery slope accusations tells us more about how people usually think than how people usually argue.

[-] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Labeling whole arguments seems to be really effective as long as the opposition gets it. Usually this is not the case, though.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This post is saying that killing orphans is ok and that Batman Begins was the best Christopher Nolan Batman movie. Before I get to the orphan thing I have to say that the Dark Knight Rises was clearly the better movie and thinking anything else is just one step away from starting World War 3.

[-] Xusies@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It seems he left his dead horse at home this time

[-] egeres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

What is this, a cross over episode?

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Don't try speaking your Swedish around here!

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

How did you know?

Hilariously enough, I have a recessive gene from a Swedish island that causes some medical issues.

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Which stands for Smackdown + RAW

[-] Putykat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, no Monty Python jokes. That's a first.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

He's on his way to argue that his red herring is dead

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

And it went...^wherever I....did go

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No it isn't.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, I have read that they’re starting to develop wills of their own.

I’m assuming this one was trained off of fashion designer Santino Rice, of Project Runway and Drag Race fame..

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
883 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27135 readers
3821 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS