For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Last I check ketchup went on fries and didn't try to lynch poc.
Have yet to see the evidence thing working.
It's usually more like
sometimes they skip 2 and 3
Yeah it's not the full flowchart
Racist to ketchup pipeline 
An important part of conservative rhetoric is turning the conversation away from the actual subject matter and toward some inane argument by analogy. "Capitalism is when you have two cows," etc.
both of your cows have screwworm
Also BSE
Yep, conservatives prefer to speak in terms of abstractions. The first step in dealing with them is to ground it in concrete terms. Instead of “immigrants” talk about specific people/situations. Instead of “lazy workers” talk about your own difficulty avoiding burnout when doing overtime for months on end. Etc.
You live in capitalism. You have no cows. You have to sell yourself into wage slavery so you can have milk to survive.
some woke commies tell you milk isn't vegan. you become even more capitalist.
milk is vegan if you leave babies in the woods and a she-wolf suckles them instead of eating them
The few times this has worked brought on regrettable consequences
Under capitalism, if you are working class, you're one of the cows
It's usually a pretty good indicator that the furthest theyve looked into a matter themselves is finding out about the analogy that they're repeating
Racism is like ketchup, and if you ask for evidence of ketchup it makes you a… ketchupist?
Demanding evidence about ketchup makes you racist? He didn't think this through at all, did he
No, no. Demanding evidence about ketchup just makes you ketchup.
maybe he orders scrambled eggs with a "racist" amount of ketchup.
How do we determine a racist amount? Do we just start pouring ketchup until someone takes offense or does it have to be exactly 88 mL?
Demanding evidence about ketchup makes you a liberal.
What does this mean? Is it like:
Some guy: "Wow, that guy hurling slurs on national tv was being pretty racist."
This guy: "Source? Evidence?" 
Some guy: 
This guy: "Heh. Another woke librul owned."
Don't believe your lyin' eyes.
Racism-as-condiment theory was a natural progression of country-as-burger theory.
As American as apple pie with ketchup
Ok here's evidence of racism for you, it's the richest man in the world doing a Nazi salute a few years ago
That's a lot like ketchup.
It's best as a sticky red paste?
I couldn't remember if Sowell was alive or dead. I figured he had to be dead but I forgot the simple maxium that some ghouls never die. He's alive and 96. I had a super-quickie look at his Wikipedia page. I found something good.
Joe Biden presidential nomination
In 2020, Sowell wrote that if the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, it could signal a point of no return for the United States, a tipping point akin to the fall of the Roman Empire. In an interview in July 2020, he stated, "the Roman Empire overcame many problems in its long history, but eventually it reached a point where it could no longer continue, and much of that was from within, not just the barbarians attacking from outside."
Sowell wrote that if Biden became president, the Democratic Party would have an enormous amount of control over the nation, and if this happened, they could twin with the "radical left" and ideas such as defunding the police could come to fruition.
He was right on the money here, you have to admit
Forcefully "The Democrats will defund every police department in America!"
"There are a some problems with that - honey."
Meekly "There are?"
"This isn't the State of the Union. You were practicing that earlier. I'm your wife, Jill and we're in the bedroom and you're wearing your pjs."
"It's not? I was? You are? We are? I am?"
"Yes! And you remembered five things at once! Great! But you also got a little confused. It's double fund not defund."
"Oh, But I am the president - right?"
"Yes. Should I sing the Happy Birthday, Mr. President song?"
"The what?"
"Just get into bed, Joe."
"Yes, dear."
For exactly zero of the reasons he stated though. Chuds love to imagine their cowardly lib opponents are some kind of mastermind network of communist billionaires trying to destroy amerikkka from within.
It's very much not that.
Oh I was being 100% sarcastic, Sowell couldn't predict if the sun will rise tomorrow
This guy's Wikipedia article is quite the trip. He went from being a Marxist in his 20s to becoming a full-blown chud in his 30s because he supposedly found out that minimum wage is bad for sugar-industry workers in Puerto Rico, because it leads to higher unemployment.
He goes further to argue that minimum wages disproportionately affect "members of racial or ethnic minority groups" that have been discriminated against. He asserts, "Before federal minimum-wage laws were instituted in the 1930s, the black unemployment rate was slightly lower than the white unemployment rate in 1930. But then followed the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) of 1933, and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 – all of which imposed government-mandated minimum wages, either on a particular sector or more broadly... By 1954, black unemployment rates were double those of whites and have continued to be at that level or higher. Those particularly hard hit by the resulting unemployment have been black teenaged males."
Sowell has been a prominent critic of government and civil rights policy approaches on race, and has argued that systemic racism is an untested, questionable hypothesis, writing, "I don't think even the people who use it have any clear idea what they're saying", and compared it to propaganda tactics used by Joseph Goebbels because if it is "repeated long enough and loud enough", people "cave in" to it.
So which one is it? 
This guy's Wikipedia article is quite the trip. He went from being a Marxist in his 20s
The only source for him being a marxist is that he says he used to be a marxist iirc. I think he is genuinely just lying about it.
I highly doubt it. If he was he’d actually have the upmost patience for people to the left of him, but all he does is masturbate over how he knows everything because chuds are automatically correct about everything because chuds are just that awesome.
Fart-sniffing condescension is fine when the so-called “real elites” are doing it.
He did write about Marxism as a student, that much is true. The question is if he was just doing it out of academic reasons or if he was actually convinced by those ideas
Not American so didn't know who thomas sowell is but his name is one letter away from the founder of the modern tomato sauce Natsoc org in Australia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sewell_(neo-Nazi)
Fitting
one letter away from the founder of the modern tomato sauce Natsoc org in Australia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sewell_(neo-Nazi)
Badly written simulation theory...
It is kind of amazing that Thomas Sowell isn't ashamed of himself. His greatest accomplishment is having the idea to name his book "Basic Economics" 26 years ago, and it's been downhill since.
racism is like a burger
But remember, if you are white and do not take a brown person breathing as a “woke” personal affront, you’re woke.
There’s no such thing as racism, but somehow reverse-racism exists and you’re a cuck if you don’t see it.