this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
207 points (96.4% liked)

Linux

65827 readers
947 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/hardware/p/2144337/commodore-announces-linux-based-flip-phone-with-no-social-media-no-browser-the-callback

Linux-based phone still ‘runs 99% of Android apps’ so you can do more with it, if you wish.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GMac@feddit.org 1 points 4 minutes ago

Whatsapp preinstalled... hard pass from me. All the other considerations like price, browser block, app emulation implementation; those are all things I could probably get past but preinstalled spyware is unacceptable from the get go.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

How could this idea come to mind.. Surely that's great, but who in the team said "Give me a price! 500!! Approved!"

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Ah yes, another company trying to squeeze ridiculous amounts of money out of people just because "it has linux".

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

Sounds great for kids. The price point can suck a dick tho

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

At $200... Maybe.

AI slop video, no faith in what will (or likely won't) be delivered.

[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Browser and email is the bare minimum, though.

Even the cheapest clamshells in the 2000s had those two.

Don't preinstall it by default if you want to look minimal but being forced to sideload (their app store blocks this essential category?????) an Android APK in the emulator instead of using native Linux apps for that, is ridiculous

I understand that for a small company like them (it's being owned by a YouTuber now) creating hardware is extremely expensive and 499 can even considered cheap with all the custom stuff in this device, plastic molds, dedicated assembly lines and so on, but my mind can't accept paying more than 149 for something like this

[–] trilobite@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't even know that the brand Commodore still existed.

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Every few years the brand name appears to be sold to some new company

[–] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

My mainphone is currently Nokia C2-01 which I got for free. It's perfectly enough for me. But damn that thing looks good..

[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

how affordable of them [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 hours ago

499? hahahhaa

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Look, I love the idea of a Linux phone.

But $500 and it manages my temptations for me? Fuck no.

The whole point of Linux is freedom.

Enough behavior shaping.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 hours ago

Yeh right, i already don't use social media on my phone, skill issue

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Commodore? C64 and Amiga Commodore? Well, it seems to be a new startup that simply bought and revived the trademark. Instead of a $500 paperweight, they should instead focus on affordable, Linux-based PCs laptop. Perhaps they build their own distro using an Amiga-esque filesystem. I would definitely daily-drive a Commodore-branded laptop.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago

Commodore as a brand has ruined every company that's ever bought it. Cursed brand some say.

[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

While it seems like everyone here hates it, I’ve been looking for a minimal phone for when my current one dies. This seems to hit the exact sweet spot of functionality I want vs what I don’t want. As for the price, well, I’m spending at least that much on my next phone anyway so it seems fine by me.

And I have a huge nostalgia for flip phones and transparent electronics. So yeah, signed up to preorder.

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Nice! I'm very tempted... I really like that it's SailfishOS. I bought an Xperia 10 III with SailfishOS and it works pretty decently. I've used the Android compatibility layer, it's pretty good.

I know it's not 100% FOSS, but maybe it's seeming like we could rally around SailfishOS for an alternative to Android and iOS.

[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 hours ago

That's easy too expensive for a phone with bad specs that just has blocked access to certain apps

[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago

It's like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We'll get some news articles about how it's trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It'll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

It's a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they're ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 47 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

MediaTek Helio G81 SoC, with 4GB/64GB

Uhhh. For $500? Sorry, no.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 45 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

I mean its a small company. We have become too used to subsidized costs at the sake of our privacy. Know why TVs are now $200? They are literal spyware in the home. Try buying one without spyware, $999 real fast for the same TV.

Know why ohone companies give you a "free" $1000 phone? Youre thr product. Constantly tracked and sold. A digital slave.

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago

Not free, and on pixels you can install de googled androids like grapheneos and LineageOS

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Opposed to fake fast?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Pinephone was a fraction of that price. Can't you run PostmarketOS on a Fair phone too? But that has much better specs.

[–] OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The pinephone was atrocious (As a daily) though. From what I’ve heard from owners it still struggles to this day to run basic mobile Linux OSes.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Fact. It's amazing that it exists, but it is definitely not a daily driver device. At least for me.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh the pinephone in general sucks for daily use . its a tinker phone

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Really? I thought mine was great

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Almost nothing works on it. Can make calls, but not receive, can open the camera, but not take a photo, etc.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

Who would I be getting calls from? I use Linux.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Phone companies dont give you a "free" $1000 phone, you're actually paying more for it via the monthly bill payments.

That's on top of you being the product as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wrongdoer2@sh.itjust.works 83 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Great initiative but at this price it's just a scam srlsy..

[–] ultimate_worrier@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

My sentiments exactly. They’re charging $499 for $5-100 worth of hardware.

This is the “snakes on a plane” of phones.

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Jolla phone and that is with much better specs

[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

That is the price if you ship million of units. Realistically, how many units can ship this? 10k? 20k?

Once you consider the price of the plastic shell molds (custom), the custom keypad, the custom motherboard, the custom assembly line, this price is almost cheap.

I wouldn't even consider a purchase even at a third of the price, but it was a scam if they simply put a sticker on some Alibaba clamshell with stock android, instead here they even partnered with Jolla to have sailfish is as base with the android emulator. That's much more expensive than just slapping android aosp with a minimal launcher and calling it a day

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 hours ago

I would expect to pay $50 for a modern flip phone with hardware comparable to one from 20y ago. But this is running Sailfish OS, has a decent SoC, camera, DAC, and up to 64GB of RAM. This ain't your grandma's flip phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 32 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

How does it not have social media or browser if so many apps are compatible? Doesn’t that amount of compatibility mean we can still have social media and browsers?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 24 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

Based on the article, they have a blocklist of certain apps. You can only install apps they allow. Not sure how extensive the list is, but surely the most popular ones are blocked and they will probably update the list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I get the idea of dumb phones, but $500 (or with taxes in Europe at least 600 EUR) for a phone that cannot even run a browser? This is ridiculous.

load more comments
view more: next ›